Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: Stories: Last 30 Days

Re: “Who's In Charge?

Seriously? The former planning director was all talk. As much as people wanted to believe his words because he has an amazing gift for telling people what they want to hear, there's no substance. The mayor did the right thing.

A better analogy would be to cast Chesney as the tailor behind the "Emperor with no Clothes." Fortunately, he was let go before he caused a major embarrassment.

Posted by thriller on 11/22/2014 at 10:19 PM

Re: “What We Aren't

i am trying to love it. i want to buy a home here and fight the good fight. issue i have is it seems to toxic with no end in sight. stayed at holiday inn downtown overlooking the river....only to wake to views of the paint company spewing pollution (right next to the college!!! LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1)). Aluminum plant seeping to the aquifer . spokesman owned by paper company who pollutes 24/7, sure take a nice hike up high dr and watch the smokestack on the horizon...oh boy what fun.....swimming? good luck!!!! if somehow i am wrong feel free to advise.

Posted by bob on 11/22/2014 at 1:17 PM

Re: “Hairy Matters

*sheepishly* I remember FireHouse, Danger Danger and Britny Fox. And Bang Tango, BulletBoys, Junkyard, Dangerous Toys, Kix, L.A. Guns, Faster Pussycat, and on and on and on. Loved it, and still rock out to it occasionally.

Posted by Lucas McIntyre on 11/22/2014 at 12:56 PM

Re: “Hairy Matters

At some point self destructive hedonism is no longer brash youthfulness. It's old, tired and creepy. Better to burn out than to fade away. Retiring the band is the only way to avoid self parody.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by muddydog on 11/22/2014 at 12:28 PM

Re: “The Lives on the Bus

Welcome to my life.

Posted by AmericanErrorist on 11/22/2014 at 2:29 AM

Re: “Transit, public use and the problem of parking lot pee-ers

I am concerned with the decision to basically close down the second floor at the plaza. Will the patrons that use the plaza to maybe connect to other busses be able to use the 2nd floor restroom or are they planning on moving that too?
How about the businesses that on the 2nd floor, will they be forced to move out of the plaza, or will they be given a choice to move downstairs at maybe at their own expense? I feel that maybe STA will have to offer an incentive to relocate in the Plaza

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Thomas Redmond on 11/21/2014 at 4:31 PM

Re: “Transit, public use and the problem of parking lot pee-ers

I agree. Spokane needs more, not less, vibrant public gathering places. The closest thing we have at this point is the atrium at River Park Square Mall, which let's face it, is pretty much a shrine to capitalism and the Cowles.

This is a city damn it! We have hundreds of thousands of people dedicated to life here. We aren't some grimy little gas station between Seattle and Minneapolis. We deserve more than a Spartan, stripped-down transit hub that no one wants to stand at!

The retroactive leadership at DSP, GSI and Visit Spokane (why are the tourism people even associating with the other two at this point?) can go to the dark, dank, abandoned pee-smelling urban hell that they would foist upon the rest of us.

After all, didn't we get the memo that only those with wealth and power should be able to afford dignified conference rooms? Only those in cars deserve to minimize their exposure to the elements outdoors? That only those paying the rent-a-cops should feel comfortable when they come around to question your right to exist where you are?

People are sick and tired of this elite tyranny. We work way too hard to be treated like stray dogs and be bossed around by these corporate cats in our own city. This is not a company town. Spokane is marching towards a brighter, more inclusive future whether the good 'ol boys are ready or not! If they were smart they'd jump out in front and claim credit for the bright new Spokane with emboldened public institutions. Instead they are wasting their time (and in some cases OUR tax money!) trying to stuff us back into the kennel where they think we belong.

Nope! Try again boys. Better go hurry up and publish another report about your austerity agenda while the media is still listening!

11 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by FedUpAndOverIt on 11/21/2014 at 4:21 PM

Re: “Announcing the Inlander 2014 Short Fiction Contest — now with cash prizes

This is why we love The Inlander! Thank you for offering this contest.

Posted by Sophia Aldous on 11/21/2014 at 10:43 AM

Re: “'It Just Felt Right'

I'm so proud of her. What an insperation.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Mirm Stevens on 11/21/2014 at 7:36 AM

Re: “Republicans' Last, Best Chance

The Republicans' landmark victories this month meant nothing and they must change their principles immediately despite their successes? Apparently it's now legal to smoke weed in Idaho, which is the only explanation for this column.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by muddydog on 11/21/2014 at 5:18 AM

Re: “In defense of Steven Moffat, Doctor Who's controversial showrunner

Disagree entirely. The entire defense of Moffat in this article seems to be built on the fact that he's superior to Davies. While I would never agree with that postulation (even Davies is superior in my opinion), it's completely beside the point. Who you SHOULD be comparing Moffat to is EVERY OTHER AUTHOR of comparable fiction in existence.
There seems to be a misconception by the author of this article that a good story relies on an interesting concept, or on particularly creative scary monsters, or on the size of the threat that the Doctor is confronted with. This seems to coincide exactly with Moffat's way of thinking and writing, and it couldn't be more FALSE.
The old, pre-revival Doctor Who was superior to Moffat's incarnation in almost every way - its writers didn't have access to the same technical and technological tricks, which forced them to utilise the viewer's IMAGINATION (you know, that asset rendered unnecessary by CGI). It didn't matter if the monster looked bad and uncreepy (and they usually did), because the viewers understood and believed in what these monsters represented - because back then, the monsters did represent something other than a discardable quick scare.
I can only recommend this brilliant short essay on the subject:

Posted by BlueTooth on 11/21/2014 at 5:00 AM

Re: “The Lives on the Bus

EdZuck, it was a good story to work on. Thank you.

Posted by Young.Kwak on 11/20/2014 at 5:33 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

I have 6 kids and he stole $5,000 from me and I have 6 kids and I have not been able to find him!!!!!!!! Till I watched the news looks like prisons next for him unless he contacts me..
[email protected]

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by GOOD GUY on 11/20/2014 at 4:31 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

There are people who volunteer their time and money every day all over Spokane to feed, clothe, and shelter homeless people in need. They help provide the essentials of survival for people who have next to nothing. This man's comments make me question if he is doing this out of compassion, or to make himself feel better. A year and a half ago, I was one of those people you see downtown with a cardboard sign asking for money. I did not take what I got for granted, I appreciated each and every person's generosity. On the rare occasion someone would give me a five, a ten, even a twenty, it would absolutely make my day. It meant I could stop standing there and go buy some alcohol, food, and tobacco. Alcohol was not what I needed to survive physically, but I am an addict. Psychologically, I needed it and I would have done anything I could to get it. The idea that by not giving these people money, you are somehow stopping them from using is ridiculous. That being said, the donations I received did not "save me" or improve my chances of getting off the street. What did was the shelters, the free meal sites, the clothing banks, and eventually Spokane detox and treatment facilities. What someone wants to do with their own money is totally up to them. Giving a stranger cash will surely make them happy in the short term, and it does make you feel good to give that kind of immediate relief to someone in need. They may not even use it for alcohol or drugs, you can't know that for sure. But don't have any illusions about it, more than likely you are not saving someone's life. The people doing that are busy making dinner for 200 people back at the shelter with food donated by other generous people. There are so many ways to help people who need it, giving an individual cash is just the easiest and most self gratifying way. Now that I have over a year of sobriety and am no longer homeless, when I think of the people who helped me get where I am today it's not the ones that gave me a dollar out their car window. Those memories fade fast.

9 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Alex Mabe on 11/20/2014 at 8:49 AM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

Mark Richards really needs to hire a PR consultant before he continues on this unfortunate path and the public demonizes him beyond what he may or may not already deserve. Maybe his money can at least solve his escalating popularity problem.

Sure, giving cash on the street may not be the most effective way to create lasting change. But taken with DSP/GSI/Visit Spokane's class campaign against the dignity and rights of low income people in this city, people are going to rebel against his standpoint. Even if it is "logical" - when posed as part of a larger agenda that flies in the face of basic human decency and respect people are going to chew it up and spit it out like cheap gum.

Maybe one positive side effect of all this needless conflict will be that the vast differences in experience of the richer class in Spokane from the average income class will be better exposed and someone will actually seriously pose the question of what can be done to reduce these disparities. Hey, it could happen...

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by FedUpAndOverIt on 11/19/2014 at 5:42 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

This gentlemen has every right to give away money any way he likes. But the underlying assumption is he is doing something and others are not. Hogwash.

I think it's also cruel and unwarranted to identify him and his past record, too.

That said, I would challenge this gentleman, who says he understands finances, to compare the benefit of handing cash out to folks on the street vs. giving the same amount of money to meals on wheels, the House of Charity or any charities that feed, clothe and provide beds to the homeless of Spokane.

The House of Charity housed over 70,000 people last year. Second Harvest has fed hundreds of thousands of people year round. It goes on. Simply, randomly, handing out cash should certainly be this man's prerogative and also go without condemnation. But to suggest it is more or even as helpful as other ways of donating to help the poor, does not stand any reasonable test.

5 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Jerry Mcginn on 11/19/2014 at 4:54 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

It's this fellow's money. I don't think exposing his name and even his record & questioning his motives serves any purpose.

If there is something in need of discussion, it might be comparing the value of handing out cash randomly vs, giving the same amount of money to help a larger number of charities that help homeless folks year round. House of Charity houses something like 70k people throughout the year. The Salvation Army & Second Harvest feed and house and clothed hundreds of thousands of folks. There are many, many more whose organizations try diligently to stretch every nickel the get to help the down and out.

So if this fellow is looking to make a real impact, there is no question his money would stretch further and help more vis a vis a charity that specializes in homeless services, than simply dishing it out randomly.


In the end, it's his choice & I applaud his generosity & effort.

g.a. McGinn

3 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Jerry Mcginn on 11/19/2014 at 4:25 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

Seriously the man is just giving to the Homeless. He has given everything to the least of these. And you have someone like mark Richard saying it's a bad thing? Well Mr Richard, you can go suck a lemon sir. Your campaign is flawed. All your posters that discourage people from giving from their hearts, paint the whole population as addicts, bums, and alcoholics. It is obvious an education did not impart to you common sense. Quit trying to tell the people to withold any giving from their hearts. If we were all judged based on the status we hold in life, well politicians such as yourself would be in prison. I think the only law broken here is your human rights violation, painting every Homeless person as a bad guy.

7 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Jesse Quintana on 11/19/2014 at 4:14 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

there is no wrong in giving people some money if they need it. mark above is a asshole. Who obviously doesnt know any homeless people in real life or has a grasp on the reality of it.

5 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Harold Staam on 11/19/2014 at 2:43 PM

Re: “Meet the guy who's giving away thousands of dollars in cash to the homeless in Spokane

The problems with this approach are many. First, giving money to someone who is panhandling is not the same as giving to someone in need. Local and national studies prove that most people who need help are in our shelters and they are willing to make the changes in their lives to receive help and get to a better place. And contrary to this gentleman's impression, we have dozens and dozens of service providers and the most amazing giving community on the planet! For instance, there are meals served at several locations downtown every single day, 365 days a year.
Second, when handing out wads of cash at Carlisle ( a housing facility for those suffering from mental illness) Mr. Jarzebek was confronted by staff who said it was a bad idea. These people are on medications, they have health issues-just giving them cash to go buy donuts or booze could kill them!
I give a good deal of money to charity, as you do.. I say this in anticipation of what will be said about this post if i don't. My point being, giving to charity treats and serves the person in genuine need where they can be best served (with caring professionals) and not at our entry points to our city and on the street. What kind of dignity does that show?
Why are there so many panhandlers in Spokane? Because it works! Because well-intended people think they are doing good by giving panhandlers free money; expecting them to do good things with it. Guess what, they keep coming back. Oh, and they tell their friends; "come to Spokane, its great! You don't have to work and you get free money on every street corner".. and, statistically, the majority of them have housing and have addictions they are feeding. If you want to be sure the panhandler has help, give to your favorite charity and then direct the person on the street to that charity!
Giving to charities that hire professionals is the ultimate giving (with love, a belief they are worth more, and a desire to help those in need to a better path, not to another bottle, and with an immeasurably higher likelihood the money will indeed help that person) while not detracting from our great city and giving the next person who moves here like Mr. Jarzebek the false impression there are so many homeless people that no one cares about so I better go give them a bunch of cash.

14 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Mark on 11/19/2014 at 2:16 PM

Recent Comments

  • Re: Who's In Charge?

    • Seriously? The former planning director was all talk. As much as people wanted to believe…

    • on November 22, 2014
  • Re: What We Aren't

    • i am trying to love it. i want to buy a home here and fight…

    • on November 22, 2014
  • Re: Hairy Matters

    • *sheepishly* I remember FireHouse, Danger Danger and Britny Fox. And Bang Tango, BulletBoys, Junkyard, Dangerous…

    • on November 22, 2014
  • Re: Hairy Matters

    • At some point self destructive hedonism is no longer brash youthfulness. It's old, tired and…

    • on November 22, 2014
  • Re: The Lives on the Bus

    • Welcome to my life.

    • on November 22, 2014
  • More »

© 2014 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation