Riverkeeper 
Member since Mar 23, 2013


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Recent Comments

Re: “The People's Court

Lila Pearl is Haskell's wife!

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Riverkeeper on 10/09/2014 at 12:09 PM

Re: “Would the Spokane Tribe's Casino cause Fairchild to close? Heck no, independent study says

Ironically, Spokane County approved a private airfield near Cheney with houses directly at the end of the runway that it continues to insist pose no safety concerns. See http://www.cheneyfreepress.com/story/2010/11/18/front-page/neighbors-rally-to-oppose-a-private-airstrip-planned-outside-of-cheney/4166.html
How does that figure?

Posted by Riverkeeper on 02/02/2013 at 6:48 AM

Re: “Another Lap

Mielke´s comparison to Antoine Peak is not fair. 50% of the cost of acquiring Antoine Peak came directly from the State and the rest of the funds came from Conservation Futures funds which are dedicated to acquisition of lands that benefit wildlife, conserve natural resources, and increase passive recreation and educational opportunities. The purpose of the acquisition was not to provide recreation.

Posted by Riverkeeper on 02/17/2012 at 10:31 AM

Re: “Shelter from the Storm

Yes, but you should not swim in or otherwise expose yourself to the river within 48 hours of a sewer overflow -- exposure to raw sewage can cause a long list of nasty illness.

Posted by Riverkeeper on 06/11/2010 at 8:53 AM

Re: “Salvatori Salvaging

I applaud Steve´s efforts to revitalize downtown -- unfortunately, his party has a platform of dismantling the Growth Management Act and both Mr. Mielke and Mr. Richard have demonstrated a similar distain for that law. 


The Growth Management Hearings Board has over and over again found their decision out of compliance with the law and the basic tenants of good land use planning.


Lack implementation of our land use laws make it cheap for developers to develop on undeveloped lands in places far from existing urban services, while passing the costs of roads, schools, and infrastructure on to us.  This creates economic disinsentives for the redevelopment of our downtown core.


Without the GMA and good land use planning, we will continue to have the type of sprawl in this community that has allowed our downtown businesses to die and for the number of vacant buildings to increase.  We need to redirect development into our downtown core if we want those buildings to open again and stop encouraging development in rural areas by the reckless land use decision and arbitrary expansion of the Urban Growth Area.

Posted by Riverkeeper on 05/31/2010 at 7:57 AM

© 2014 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation