Pin It

A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) 

Freddy Krueger is more human in this remake of the 1984 original. But not necessarily scarier.

click to enlarge A Nightmare on Elm Street
  • A Nightmare on Elm Street

Batman did it. James Bond, too. Both series “rebooted” themselves with meaner, darker versions of their titular protagonists. Gone were the gimmicks and catchphrases — the corny mutations that resulted from propagating too many sequels. The new Bond and Bruce Wayne were supposed to be the purest iterations of these oft-drawn characters.

Likewise, the new Freddy Krueger.

In the 16 years since the be-clawed villain first began stalking his victims’ dreams in 1984’s A Nightmare on Elm Street, Freddy had become something of a joke. Producer Michael Bay’s solution, then, was to return the villain to his roots in this slightly tweaked remake of the first film.

And some of the reboot works.

Just updating the music and wardrobe might have sufficed to hook a new generation, but there’s also the advance in special effects. Where Wes Craven had to rely on sets and red-dyed water to paint his dreamscapes in 1984, Bay and company can, with CGI, more artfully blur the lines between sleep and wakefulness.

But the new Freddy, played by Watchmen’s Jackie Earle Haley (and not, for the first time, by Robert Englund), isn’t a huge improvement over the 1984 original. Sure, he’s less bumbling, and he doesn’t caterwaul like old Freddy. He also hearkens back to Craven’s unused original idea — that Freddy is not a child killer but a child molester. But while that makes his villainy a little creepier and more human than O.F.’s mere motive-less psychopathy, it also blunts what could be a slicing social commentary.

We still get hints of that commentary. Perhaps Freddy is actually innocent, and his murderous rage is fueled less by plain sadism than burning injustice. Or is Freddy a metaphor for danger the characters’ ignorant, self-absorbed parents fail to protect them from?

In the end, though (spoiler alert!), the new Freddy is neither of these. He’s just an effed-up glorified pederast out to replay the same violence he inflicted on children a decade before. And while that’s grip-the-armrest scary, it’s not the kind of fright that continues to haunt the imagination for years. (Rated R)

Tags: ,

  • Pin It

Latest in Film

  • Living in a Song
  • Living in a Song

    Noam Baumbach and Greta Gerwig gives us a familiar yet engaging story in Mistress America
    • Sep 2, 2015
  • A Hike Becomes a Death March
  • A Hike Becomes a Death March

    A Walk in the Woods lacks a cinematic smart-ass
    • Sep 2, 2015
  • Slaying The Shark
  • Slaying The Shark

    Meru is one outdoors doc that knows a great story trumps great stunts
    • Aug 26, 2015
  • More »


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed

All of today's events | Staff Picks


More by Joel Smith

Most Commented On

  • To the Point

    Melvins' Buzz Osborne doesn't care what you think, and he never did
    • Aug 26, 2015
  • Spokane Sounds Like...

    The music we're more likely to listen to than any other city
    • Aug 19, 2015
  • More »

Top Tags in
Music & Film






© 2015 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation