Pin It
Favorite

Are The Parties Over? 

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are rewriting the rules of politics

During their wall-to-wall coverage of the days leading up to the Iowa caucuses, the media often came face to face with their own mistaken predictions and blanket generalizations. After all, only a few months earlier they had, as a class, nearly laughed themselves silly at the idea that Donald Trump might win the Republican nomination. And then there was MSNBC's Chuck Todd interviewing some "regular" Iowans; at the end of the segment, he asked one middle-aged white guy who he'd vote for if his favorite, Trump, didn't make the final cut.

click to enlarge mcgregor.jpg

He'd probably have to go with Bernie Sanders, the Iowan said. They went to commercial just when it was getting really weird.

While Sanders and Trump each came in second in Iowa Monday night, they had solid showings. For not trying too hard in a state known to favor evangelical candidates, Trump did very well. And in facing a candidate who has been running for president for more than a decade, Sanders' "virtual tie" was a victory.

Sanders and Trump are about as far apart as two men can be; how could that Iowa voter have them as his top two? Odd, yes, but it makes sense. We've been conditioned to think about politics in terms of the split between political parties, the split between urban and rural America and the split between red and blue states. But is it really more of a class thing?

Trump and Sanders are appealing to the angry middle — the people who worry more about their stagnant wages than which party a candidate belongs to. Sanders and Trump are also, functionally, independents — Sanders literally so, as he only caucuses with Senate Democrats. While Trump may be able to pull out a Bible verse when the crowd demands it, let's be real — philosophically, he's an independent.

And that's a great place to be, as last year 43 percent of Americans claimed to belong to neither party, according to Gallup — the highest since they've been tracking it.

Whether a billionaire will turn out to be a traitor to his class like the Roosevelts, or if a self-described Democratic socialist can really move a capitalist nation, we don't know yet.

So America may nominate a rude billionaire demagogue and a disheveled hippie idealist to duke it out. That would be the most remarkable match in our history — settling in the starkest terms the struggle between labor (Sanders) and capital (Trump; sorry, I don't buy his sticking-up-for-the-little-guy act). It's a battle that's been waged since America first rose from its rural roots.

The other remarkable thing is how little the political parties have been a part of getting to here. The Democrats are struggling under the hangover of eight years in the White House. Few are very excited about Hillary Clinton, which isn't really fair, as she might be the most experienced presidential candidate ever. Meanwhile, the two leading Republicans — Trump and Ted Cruz — are despised by party honchos.

A popular analysis is that Trump and Cruz would kill the Republican brand, but really, the GOP has been doing just fine by itself. Maybe it started when Speaker Newt Gingrich took power from members of Congress for himself. Later party leaders gleefully created super PACs, but are horrified now that they have run amok. They handed over the agenda-setting function to entertainers on FOX News. They've shut down the government out of spite, triggering a cut in the nation's credit rating, and nominated Sarah Palin to the second-highest office in the land. Today, the Tea Party-powered Freedom Caucus is calling the shots in Congress, deposing Speaker John Boehner and handpicking his successor. Meanwhile, the list of policy accomplishments is blank. You can see why Americans are turning away from political parties.

In E.J. Dionne's new book, Why the Right Went Wrong, he tracks the history of the Republican Party from the Goldwater campaign on. It's a trail that wanders further and further from moderation, where the majority of Americans live. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama pushed the trend by co-opting some the GOP's best reforms, from welfare to health care. Republicans haven't come close to winning a national election since George W. Bush rode off into the sunset.

Are we too fragmented a society to live under any kind of big tent? Even in the Iowa results, you can see the parties' grip slipping. Still, they may yet prevail with a Hillary Clinton-Marco Rubio matchup. But if party crashers Trump, Cruz or Sanders are nominated, that could mark the end of political parties as we have known them. Maybe we should cheer Sanders and Trump for puncturing the balloon full of all that hot air, allowing the blossoming of a more representative political future.

But what would replace them? New microparties of all varieties, representing all of America's tribes? Ultra-rich independents like Trump and former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg calling the shots? The very notion of unity and progress is at stake, and while parties have their problems, we may rue the day that politics became a complete free-for-all.

In these coming months, we're settling on a future leader. But we're also holding a referendum on traditional American politics. ♦

  • Pin It

Speaking of Election 2016

  • OK, Hold Your Nose
  • OK, Hold Your Nose

    Everything you need to know before Election Day
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Base of Support
  • Base of Support

    Polling local leaders and opinion-makers about presidential politics
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Don's Ultimate Con
  • Don's Ultimate Con

    Trail Mix: Trump's birther problems and Johnson's polls
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • More »

Latest in Comment

  • Class Act
  • Class Act

    Seeing through money differences can build relationships focused on fairness
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Don's Ultimate Con
  • Don's Ultimate Con

    Trail Mix: Trump's birther problems and Johnson's polls
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Transparent Motives
  • Transparent Motives

    One candidate's an open book; the other is shrouded in secrecy. Guess which one isn't transparent enough
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • More »

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Today | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon | Tue
Mad Hatter Vintage Flea Market

Mad Hatter Vintage Flea Market @ Five Mile Grange

Fri., Sept. 30 and Sat., Oct. 1

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Ted S. McGregor Jr.

  • After the Deluge
  • After the Deluge

    Cleaning up Trump's hot mess is going to take some heroic leadership
    • Sep 1, 2016
  • <b>From Crimson &#10;to Purple</b>
  • From Crimson to Purple

    Bob Gregory was a Spokane-bred Cougar through and through; now he's prowling the sidelines for the Huskies
    • Sep 1, 2016
  • Staying Engaged
  • Staying Engaged

    From the Mayfair Cafe to Central Park
    • Aug 4, 2016
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • Murrow's Nightmare

    Debate moderators need to be much more than an onstage prop to make our democracy work
    • Sep 15, 2016
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

election 2016


Briefs


trail mix


green zone


marijuana


Readers also liked…

  • To Kill the Black Snake
  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • A Persistent Life
  • A Persistent Life

    Scott Reed won more cases than he lost in life, and the beauty of the Coeur d'Alene area has been the beneficiary
    • May 27, 2015

© 2016 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation