Friday, November 27, 2009

Trip the Dark Fantastic

Anderson’s animated retelling of Roald Dahl’s story isn’t fluffy or cute, but it’s utterly real

Maryann Johanson

I was so astonished by Fantastic Mr. Fox that I realized that I needed to read Roald Dahl’s book before I could even begin to get my head around Wes Anderson’s extraordinary movie. Was it merely that Anderson was standing on some astonishing shoulders? Or was he standing on astonishing shoulders and then bulked up with some astonishing shoulders of his own?

Did Dahl invent this notion of Mr. Fox (the voice of George Clooney), settling down from his felonious thieving of the local farmers’ fowl at the request of his wife, Mrs. Fox (the voice of Meryl Streep)? Did Dahl invent the notion that, years later, he might seek to return to his life of crime? Is it down to Dahl that Mr. Fox has a lawyer — Mr. Badger (the voice of Bill Murray) — and that he needs a lawyer because, come on, no one wants to get into real estate and take on a mortgage without someone looking out for you? Did Dahl write dialogue that included frequent substitutions of vulgarities with “cuss,” as in “Why the cuss didn’t I listen to my lawyer?” As it turns out, these things have no place whatsoever in Dahl’s story. Director Wes Anderson and his co-screenwriter Noah Baumbach looked at a sweet-and-sour children’s story through a peculiarly skewed eye and said, this can be so much more. And they turned it into something touching and funny, and magically absurd and at the same time pointedly real. They turned it into something genius.

Their Fantastic Mr. Fox is like Ocean’s Eleven made by Nick “Wallace and Gromit” Park, a cartoon suitable for grownups and children alike, shrewd and witty in both its style and substance. Some of the sharpest, most observant dialogue of the whole year is in this script: “I enjoyed it, but I shouldn’t have done it,” says Mr. Fox about his return to crime. Some of the most striking and most unexpected visuals in ages are here, charming and off-kilter imagery that makes it feel utterly authentic. It’s in how the lack of fl uffy cuteness in Anderson’s stop-motion-animated characters makes them characters you can really love — even when they’re frustratingly complicated and contradictory and just confi dently themselves — instead of something to “awww” over. It makes it easy to share their exuberance and their dissatisfaction and their disasters and their triumphs.

It’s in how Fantastic Mr. Fox is perfectly, deliciously odd, and just plain perfect.

Also in Movie Review

Faster and Furious-er

The meathead franchise turns out a surprising hit

Ed Symkus |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

To the Pines

Ryan Gosling is at his best in one of the best films of the year

Joseph Haeger |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Interstellar Gem

J.J. Abrams makes a better Star Trek this time around

Ed Symkus |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

The Future is Now

Jason Bateman can't make Disconnect feel current

Leah Churner |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Accurate Translation

Baz Luhrmann gives the great American novel a 3D treatment

Ed Symkus |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By Maryann Johanson

Bump and Daily Grind

Good dancers! Evil dancers! Stanley Tucci! How did such a winning formula go so wrong?

Maryann Johanson |
Wednesday, December 1,2010

They Bore Among Us

Not wizards, not vampires - this movie has persecuted space aliens. But so cute!

Maryann Johanson |
Wednesday, February 16,2011

A Whole New Ball Game

A sport you don’t understand becomes a metaphor we should all embrace

Maryann Johanson |
Tuesday, January 12,2010

Children of the Night

Vampires are sensitive, werewolves are decisive and girls are idiots. Nice message, Twilight.

Maryann Johanson |
Wednesday, June 30,2010

Stupidest vs. Dumberer

When men act like fraidy-cat boys, their story comes off as brain-sucking stupid.

Maryann Johanson |
Wednesday, January 19,2011


 
 
Close
Close
Close