Thursday, January 14, 2010

What Hope Remains

A tone-perfect adaptation explores how little you can have and still find reason to keep living

Ed Symkus

Naysayers who have been going on and on for the past five years about Cormac McCarthy’s dreary, grueling and deeply moving book The Road being unfilmmable are about to have their mouths shut.

In this grim, straightforward tale, a man and his son make their way across a burnt-out landscape, looking for food and warmth, just trying to stay alive. Played by Viggo Mortensen (looking ragged and exhausted) and 12-year-old Kodi Smit-McPhee (looking tired and disheveled), the two make an odd, scrawny couple.

The father’s only mission is to protect his boy. That includes protection from rain, snow, freezing temperatures, hunger and dangerous roving bands of other survivors. Because he feels safe in the constant company of his dad, the boy’s only real role is to be a boy, to try as best he can to keep his curiosity alive.

The film actually has a beautiful, bright and flowery start, but it almost immediately throws the viewer into our heroes’ awful gray existence. When it’s not raining or snowing, the sky is filled with dark, ominous clouds. But the two continue along, a few meager supplies in a rattling shopping cart, heading for the east coast of America, hoping to find something, anything, that will pass for comfort.

There’s not much actual speaking in the film, though there’s plenty of the father’s interior narration, revealing such things as, “It’s been years since I kept a calendar.”

Even when father and son do speak, it’s brief and to the point. After a harrowing sequence that hints of the existence of cannibalism, the frightened boy turns to his dad and meekly asks, “We wouldn’t ever eat anybody, would we?” Dad’s answer: “Of course not.”

Accompanied by a quiet, mournful score by Nick Cave and Warren Ellis, the fi lm becomes a study of the closeness between father and son.

Though most of the really grisly passages from the book have been removed, some of this is still hard to take, whether it’s an intensely terrifying scene of marauding bad guys in a truck or a gentle bit where the father explains to his son that if things get really bad, there are two bullets in his gun — “one for you, one for me.”

Yet there are also moments of what at least looks like hope.

Slowly paced for its entire two hours, the film is an excellent adaptation of the book, perfectly capturing its bleakness. It’s trimmed down in all the right places, the relationship between father and son is totally believable and the bittersweet ending is just right.

Also in Movie Review

Interstellar Gem

J.J. Abrams makes a better Star Trek this time around

Ed Symkus |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

The Future is Now

Jason Bateman can't make Disconnect feel current

Leah Churner |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Accurate Translation

Baz Luhrmann gives the great American novel a 3D treatment

Ed Symkus |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Quick Adaptation

The Inlander’s winning short fiction submissions become the subject of the 50 Hour Slam

Mike Bookey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Third Time’s the Charm

The latest installment of the Iron Man franchise is the strongest

Maryann Johanson |
Tuesday, April 30,2013

Also By Ed Symkus

Charming Sadist

Ed Symkus |
Tuesday, January 16,2007

The Lure of Sinbad

Ed Symkus |
Wednesday, October 15,2008

Loco Motive

Denzel and Captain Kirk are all that stands between us and deadly choo-choo trains.

Ed Symkus |
Thursday, November 11,2010

The Goats of War

Psychic spies bring slapstick to the Iraq desert. War hasn’t been this much fun since 1812

Ed Symkus |
Monday, November 9,2009

Unsolved mystery

Ed Symkus |
Monday, February 12,2001


 
 
Close
Close
Close