Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Jail Break

Spokane’s leaders better get their act together before they ask for a new jail

Ted S. McGregor Jr.

Here’s a familiar script: It all starts with some public agency wanting to solve a problem. They start holding meetings. Only a few hardcores show up, along with elected officials. Ultimately we, the media, decide it’s story-worthy. People start to hear about it, criticisms come out and citizens wonder why nobody ever held a meeting.

Yeah, this is why public officials get receding hairlines — they pull it out themselves.

But it’s a fact of civic life around here — an issue is only an issue when people start paying attention. You can complain that they should have been involved all along, but if you need public money, it’s moot. You need to play by the public’s rules, cockamamie as they may be.
This is happening again. People in the know have been discussing the need for a new jail for Spokane County for years. Joe Q. Public, however, may just be hearing about it. So it’s wise that our elected officials are taking their feet off the gas pedal to regroup.

There’s a big danger that an effort to make a big change can get permanently crippled by shifting rationales. Just look at North Idaho, where they still haven’t been able to pass a jail expansion bond after several tries. It’s important to work together and get this one right the first time. Here’s some free advice.

• Don’t locate the new jail on North Monroe. Why pick a fight with downtown boosters when you’ve already got an uphill battle? And putting a jail along the edge of what we hope will be an expanding commercial core doesn’t pass the common sense test.

• Pitch this as another example of regional cooperation (aka, better government), which it should be. Not being able to agree on a plan at this point (as seemed to happen last week) will not make this case.

• Tackle the root causes. If we just keep doing the same thing — build more jail cells, lock up more people, even if they’re just mentally ill — voters will feel poorly served. Maybe a package could include amped-up efforts to intervene in mental health cases earlier, or to create more drug court slots. Such programs save money. Of course there should always be room for violent offenders in our jails.


This is a lot harder than it looks. But it’s what our times call for — and what the people will require. 

Also in Commentary

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Cougar by the Tail

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Power to the People

Will Spokane step up and grab its own future?

Thomas Alan Linzey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By Ted S. McGregor Jr.

On The River

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Thursday, June 5,2003

Trail Mix - 9.13.12

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, September 11,2012

Conventional wisdom

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Monday, February 12,2001

Mount Spokane

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Thursday, November 8,2001

Multimedia Gift Guide | Books

Good reads for everyone on your list — history buffs, tech geeks, musically inclined folks, even liberals

Ted S. McGregor Jr., Joe O'Sullivan |
Tuesday, December 11,2012


 
 
Close
Close
Close