Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Confidence?

A Spokane police vote shows a lack of trust in top cops

Kevin Taylor
Spokane Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick
Spokane Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick
Spokane Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick

A vote taken last month by members of the Spokane Police Guild found that a majority — “a supermajority,” according to the union’s president — have no confidence in the leadership of the city’s top cops.

Or does it?

Guild president Detective Ernie Wuthrich says he won’t reveal the exact breakdown of the balloting — not how many votes were cast, not the total cast for no-confidence and not how many ballots were returned blank as an apparent protest of the vote. Not to media, not to city leaders.

“The mayor wanted to know. I haven’t even told her,” Wuthrich says in a Sunday telephone interview.

The Guild has 268 members and turnout for this vote, conducted between March 15-19, was high, Wuthrich says.

“When you won’t even reveal your numbers, that says a lot,” Chief Anne Kirkpatrick says outside the City Council chambers Monday evening. “When they won’t even reveal the vote to my boss [Mayor Mary Verner] in the privacy of her office … what does that say? I do not consider this a vote of no confidence.”

Kirkpatrick is one of the candidates for the open Seattle police chief job who’s getting a lot of early buzz. The timing of the vote “is meant to hurt me with Seattle.”

Wuthrich says the vote was not against Kirkpatrick herself, but as reflected in the ballot title, it polled Guild members on their confidence in the leadership and decision-making coming from the office of the chief — which includes Kirkpatrick and Assistant Chief Jim Nicks.

Wuthrich won’t release exact ballot numbers, he says, because he doesn’t want Guild membership to seize upon the details and become further fractured.

“I’m trying to hold this union together. Morale is bad,” Wuthrich says.

There has been division in the police force for many years, long predating Kirkpatrick’s arrival in September 2006, both the chief and Wuthrich say.

Kirkpatrick arrived in the wake of the Otto Zehm tragedy. (The 36-year-old janitor, mistakenly suspected of robbery, died after an extended brawl with police.) She vowed to bring transparency, accountability and swift discipline.

One of her first initiatives was to bring in a different agency to investigate police after such high-profile incidents, a measure the Guild supported, Wuthrich says.

He and the chief note that the new policy was not completed by the time the next outrage blew up: Jay Olson, drunk and off-duty, chased Shonto Pete through downtown and shot him in the head.

Kirkpatrick called on County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich to investigate, which created turmoil and confusion.

The Guild likes and supports the new protocol, Wuthrich says, but its abrupt and unilateral installation in the middle of an officer-involved shooting before the plan was even completed created turmoil and revealed the chief’s tendency to be “impatient,” as he puts it.

The Guild has filed seven unfair labor practices against police administration, Wuthrich says, and members were discussing a no-confidence vote as early as January 2009. He says he briefed Kirkpatrick on the mood of the union and forestalled the vote in order to try and address the issue internally.

“Morale is at an all-time low because of these things that I mentioned,” Wuthrich says. “A lot of these things have to do with trust. If we trust a leader, it has to be a leader that doesn’t kick us to the curb.”

Kirkpatrick calls the timing of the Guild vote suspicious, coming in the weeks after she announced her candidacy in Seattle.

“I am not going to change the mission and direction of the department [because] some people don’t like change,” she says.

Wuthrich and Kirkpatrick, in their separate interviews, each expressed a desire for a more unified force.

“This could turn out to be the healthiest thing for the department. It’s forcing us to have a conversation about where do we stand? Do we want to continue to be divided internally?” Kirkpatrick asks.

For his part, Wuthrich says, “We are eager to follow the legal processes to make changes that will better the department. We need a leader who will take the time and is willing to follow procedures.

“We want this place to get better, and we want a leader we can trust,” Wuthrich says.

Also in News

Local Limits

What stands between your shopping cart and local farmers

Heidi Groover |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Feds Come Knocking

The feds scare a medical pot store from opening up; plus, how to help those displaced by last week’s fire

Heidi Groover, Deanna Pan |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Rats Giggle Too

And that's a bigger deal than you might think

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

There's Not Enough Poverty In Kids' Books

A Whitworth researcher studies how picture books reflect the reality of American poverty

Deanna Pan |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

We Can Turn DNA into Music

An Eastern Washington University professor creates audio interpretations of living things

Seth Sommerfeld |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Also By Kevin Taylor

Go With the Flow

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, September 26,2007
Summer Guide 2011

June

Earl tries his hand at paddling, biking and dribbling and checks out Kiss, Langhorne Slim and sake.

Joel Smith, Kevin Taylor, Nicholas Deshais, Jordan Satterfield |
Tuesday, June 7,2011

Who Will Pay?

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, July 9,2008

A Brief Roundup

Kevin Taylor |
Thursday, December 14,2006

Ozzie Vs. Cal

Kevin Taylor |
Monday, July 31,2006


This is such a huge issue. NOBODY TRUST THE POLICE NOW




 (OTTO ZEHM>>>>OTTO ZEHM")




I do trust Tim Burns (our "Ombudsman"), but he needs investigative authority. He needs it now. Portland Oregon has the very same problem. The desperately need a TIM BURNS.




PJALS is absolutely correct. The Ombudsman needs "teeth" (subpoena power)




-




OTTO ZEHM....OTTO ZEHM




This blog post written by David Elton...a bipolar man who fears police and their brainless and Napoleonic response to "excited delirium"




Those two words give them the "LICENSE TO KILL" (OO7)




OTTO ZEHM !




OTTO ZEHM !




TRENT YOHE




The list goes on (13 killed in police custody since Otto




 




WOW (God help us all)...save us from rogue and idiotic cops like THOMPSON and DAN TOROK (and especially Rocky Treppeidi (his nickname downtown is "SCUMbag"...a perfect name for him...ACCURATE !




 




David Elton




 




____________________________________

Apr 16, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

People reading here may wish to read the comment thread at the <i>Spokesman-Review</i>.  Kudos to Mr. Taylor for actually writing a fairly objective piece.  As I said in my latest comment in the S-R thread:




Kevin Taylor of the Inlander has a pretty objective article on the current tiff between the Chief and the Guild:




http://www.inlander.com/spokane/article-14918-confidence.html#dComments




Taylor does give a little more insight into the union´s concerns/gripes with their relationship with the Chief Kirkpatrick. There are always two sides or more to controversial issues. As I said in the other thread (link above) having been a police union president, I do understand the points the union is trying to raise that may have been drowned out in the other hype re this story. However the Chief and the police rank and file have a very significant trust/transparency/image problem with Spokane citizens. They both have a joint responsibility to provide quality police service as WE THE PUBLIC are paying for this.




BTW a little off thread but related to the underlying issues affecting City administration and the provision of public service, here´s another article. I´m not pleased with the fire department´s senior management either as they are spending a lot of OPM and we´re not getting our buck´s worth - pending EMS Levy vote. See this very interesting report just released by award winning investigative reporter Larry Shook:




Fire and Fraud in Spokane
http://larryshook.com/2010/04/12/fire-and-fraud-in-spokane/




On a side note there´s a lot of cheering going here on re the involvement of the US Attorney´s Office and the filing of a criminal civil rights case. You can read my previous opinion here:




Federal Civil Rights Indictment Returned in Otto Zehm Case - Spokane, WA




http://tinyurl.com/y2xkdrg




The federal involvement is very laudable and gives the object review that is necessary in this tragic case. I´m not privy to the inside information but I don´t think the feds can make their reasonable doubt burden in front of a jury that Ofc. Thompson´s actions rise to a violation of this federal statute. I could be wrong though as testimony/evidence of the federal investigation comes out at trial. Zehm´s death was at the very least a wrongful death. The City should have quickly resolved/settled this case, changed police policy and procedure and taken disciplinary action where appropriate. The City´s stonewalling on this case did not do anyone any good and further polarized the police/community.




What concerns me the most is the changing police statements over time and inconsistent statements made to federal investigators as reported in the companion article in yst´s paper e.g., Asst. Chief Nicks. I will wager the feds get a conviction on lying to federal investigators ala Martha Stewart. I have issues with this federal statute. State and local law enforcement don´t have this “Mulligan” rule. Crooks lie all the time. If you can´t make your principal case based on the evidence/testimony, then you wait for next time. Of course inconsistent statements can impeach or go to the credibility of the suspect´s statements but convicting someone for making false or misleading statements to the police is an over reach and borders on abridging 5th Amendment rights.




My concern regarding the feds is where was their passion in the RPS Bond Frauds and the death of Jo Savage? I won´t bore you with the details here. The death of Otto Zehm and subsequent actions by the City are only symptomatic of much deeper fundamental issues with the systemic corruption of City government as described in Shook´s article (above) and by me that those interested they can read further here:




http://tinyurl.com/ykemtq




Det. Ron Wright (Retired)
Past-President of the Riverside Police Officers´ Assn
Riverside PD, CA

Apr 16, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Chief Kirkpatrick never killed a person, where as the Guild has backed at least 7 murderers of Otto Zehm.




Stop




Chief Kirkpatrick serves the citizenry, the Guild serves it self.




Stop




Way past time the guild be removed.

Apr 17, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Romeomoon,





Yes the Police Guild has significant public image issues. Spokane PD does too. The Guild generally has no issue with the discipline that Chief Kirkpatrick has handed out. Their issues is with the process. Read my other comments in the S-R comment threads.





These are process issues have to do with very complex due process rights of the officers during both a criminal/internal affairs investigations. It´s not an issue of the Guild supporting the actions of a member, the Guild has a responsibility to ensure its member´s rights are respected. These nuances are generally not understood by the public. This airing of dirty laundry in public doesn´t help the process but the public does need to know that there are problems. These are issues that Mayor Verner must immediately address and let fester.





There is no question that Jay Olsen acted way out of line with what is the norm police re police policy/procedures/tactics. Probably Sgt. Thoma´s should have been fired for cause (DUI and hit and run) but the manner in which Chief Kirkpatrick did it left the City open to wrongful termination liability that Attorney Dunn is now exploiting. Trust me the majority of the rank and file of police organizations do not want such poor decision makers within their ranks.





See one of my later posts at the S-R:





I think Tim has written some other commentary and straight news pieces re CFJ´s involvement in the Zehm case. Just go to their home page and click around on the news links and Tim´s kitchen table at the bottom of the right side rail. Also run “Otto Zehm” in their search box.





http://cforjustice.org/





With regard to your other question you might want to read the comment I just posted in the other thread. It may give you some of my insight as to where the solutions lie. Sorry but I don´t have more time to answer more specifically as I have to teach tonight in my college class, “Community Oriented Policing”:-)





http://tinyurl.com/y3u6e8y





This is a very difficult walk to walk to restore the trust in the police department. I do sympathize with the rank and file of the PD but there are significant issues with City management that must be first addressed/fixed before meaningful change can occur with police management/leadership.





Also I wouldn´t be too hard on Tim Burns, the new police ombudsman, yet. I met with him several times and find him to be very sincere and willing to heal the division between the police/community. The question is whether the “powers that be” will allow him to be that broker of meaningful change/transparency?





Det. Ron Wright (Retired)


Riverside PD, CA Apr 17, 2010

 

You can only give the SPD the benefit of the doubt so many times before you have to start to realize that there´s something inherently wrong here. I´m even beginning to wonder whether or not more innocent civilians have died at the hands of SPD over the last 20 years, or criminals? 




Hard to tell. With a Spokane cop you´re guilty until proven innocent.




That said there´ve been too many many people struck down by the SPD, period.




When I see an SPD patrol car these days I check to make sure there´s NO reason to be pulled over. I know it could cost me my life unless I´m totally compliant regardless of the right or wrong of it. If I´m in the vicinity of a uniform walking from, to, or around anything I will immediately leave the area.




Now if the WSP stops me.....no problem. They´re polite, professional and they might even lend you a hand if you need one. They don´t pretend they´re tough guys like so many SPD officers like to and they even know how to smile.




Big difference......




This difference continues because our idiotic Police Guild has a serious problem with objectivity and knowledge of the difference between right and wrong. I believe the Guild should be denied any influence in SPD activities and the SPD should be held to a higher standard than they are. The Guild is the enabler. Remove them from the picture and the citizens of Spokane may have a fighting chance. Otherwise, prepare for more atrocities in the future.




 

Apr 21, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close