Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Children of the Night

Vampires are sensitive, werewolves are decisive and girls are idiots. Nice message, Twilight.

Maryann Johanson
MORE INFO
tv.jpg
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse

Rated PG-13
Directed by David Slade
Starring Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner
Showtimes

The sparkly vampire guy and the shirtless werewolf guy, they’re still fighting over perfect, perfect Bella in Twilight: Eclipse.

Bella is so perfect and delicate and adorable, in fact, that’s she’s an idiot. It’s not just that she can’t choose between these two supernatural dudes; she doesn’t even know her own mind and desires. She may think she knows what she wants, but she doesn’t really, the boyfolk assure her. The lads know what’s best for Bella, and they’ll decide her future for her.

This is what passes for romance in the early 21st century: a sexless, passionless tug-of-war among children. I can just about understand why very young teenage girls might find the Twilight nonsense appealing, for it does touch on female adolescent angst about sex that pop culture rarely broaches. (Male adolescent angst about sex, meanwhile, appears to be the dominant pop-culture theme of our time.) But I’m mystified by the apparently huge numbers of adult women who find this romantic. Because Twilight isn’t about romance — it’s about a childish terror of grown-up life.

I didn’t realize it during the first Twilight film, nor its sequel, New Moon, but suddenly it smacked me in the face in Eclipse: Edward Cullen, the putative modern Heathcliff and Mr. Darcy all in one sparkly vampire package, is as much a child as Bella Swan, the blank-canvas human teenager he falls in love with. He’s a century-old immortal, he’s richer than God, and he’s not even bound by the clichés of vampirism to avoid sunlight: he could be doing anything and everything fabulous with his endless, privileged life. What does he choose to do? Attend high school in the rural Pacific Northwest, where he met Bella, back in the first film. It’s where he fell in love with her, for some unknowable reason, and she with him.

At least from her perspective, there was at first the understandable allure of the exotic, though over the course of now three films, he turns out not to have much to recommend him. Bella (Kristen Stewart) and Edward (Robert Pattinson) here continue their courtship consisting of mostly, it appears, moping around and kissing a bit, followed by high school graduation. Bella wants to make love with him, which seems like a perfect natural thing to do when two people are, we’re told, this deeply in love. But he keeps demurring: it’s “dangerous,” he insists. If there’s any sort of neat-o vampiric danger to this act, we never learn about it. Instead, sex is simply scary in some nebulous, unfathomable way... like when you’re 12 years old and are just starting to grasp what sex is all about.

And anyway, Bella doesn’t really love Edward — she really loves Jacob the Native American werewolf (Taylor Lautner). She may insist that Edward is the sexless manchild for her, but Jacob is in love with Bella, Jacob is “exactly right” for Bella, therefore Bella must secretly be in love with Jacob and must actually belong to him. “She’s not sure what she wants,” Jacob insists, and damn if he doesn’t turn out to be right! She’s only a girl anyway, someone to be lied to and controlled by sparkly vampire dudes and shirtless werewolf dudes who only want to “protect” her. This — plus Jacob’s violent male jealousy — is “romantic.” I find it terrifying.

Far less terrifying is the alleged horror content of Eclipse, about a mysterious vampire who is creating an army of vampires in order to wage war on the “peaceful,” non-human-blood-consuming Cullen clan of Forks. And then war comes, with the Cullens and the Native werewolves, longtime enemies, teaming up to fight the newborns. All of this, lazily deployed by director David Slade, seems like an afterthought, way down on the list of Important Things for Eclipse To Cover after voiceovers by Bella to explain what we can plainly see, history lessons about the beef between the vampires and the werewolves, and a few Hammer Horror appearances by the vampire aristocrats the Volturi.

By the time someone warns that “something terrible is coming,” all I could think was: “Yeah, Breaking Dawn. In two parts.”

Also in Movie Review

Faster and Furious-er

The meathead franchise turns out a surprising hit

Ed Symkus |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

To the Pines

Ryan Gosling is at his best in one of the best films of the year

Joseph Haeger |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Interstellar Gem

J.J. Abrams makes a better Star Trek this time around

Ed Symkus |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

The Future is Now

Jason Bateman can't make Disconnect feel current

Leah Churner |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Accurate Translation

Baz Luhrmann gives the great American novel a 3D treatment

Ed Symkus |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By Maryann Johanson

DVD Review

Harry Brown

A look at vigilantes and the disturbingly authentic limitations of law enforcement.

Maryann Johanson |
Wednesday, September 1,2010

The Home Front

A half-dozen fine performances help Brothers explore how poorly we’ve treated the veterans of our current wars

Maryann Johanson |
Tuesday, December 8,2009

Not Quite Ready To Wear

Despite beautiful performances, Tom Ford’s first film looks like a fashion designer made it

Maryann Johanson |
Thursday, January 21,2010

Trip the Dark Fantastic

Wes Anderson’s animated retelling of Roald Dahl’s story isn’t fluffy or cute, but it’s utterly real

Maryann Johanson |
Tuesday, January 12,2010

Frozen in Cliche

The most recent Ice Age installment has all the well-worn marks of a paycheck sequel

Maryann Johanson |
Tuesday, July 10,2012


Ok Maryann Johanson ... I made it through the first sentence of your review with my belief that everyone is entitled to their own opinion intact. By the second sentence I decided you were just "confused" . By the third sentence all my good intentions about being entitled to your own opinion flew right out the window. At that point I was reasonably certain that you hadn´t read ANY of the Twilight series and therefore really did NOT have a clue. By the end of your article I was CONVINCED that you had not read them, that you really did NOT have a clue and apparently the whole point of your "review" was simply to see your name in print. I sincerely hope that people recycle their newspaper because my opinion (I am back to believing that we are entitled) is that your review was a sad waste of newspaper.





There is a lot more I could say (there goes my opinion again!) but if the gray space is any indication the we are only allowed a limited opinion.





Let me simply close by saying that when Breaking Dawn comes out - both movies - all three generations from my house will once again be in line and I am 100% positive that we won´t be alone, or the only one in our particular age group, that will be there. Jul 08, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Wow.....after reading this ridiculous article, I am almost speechless. Three words come to mind READ THE BOOKS! It is very apparent to me that not only have you not read these books, but also you yourself have NO sense of romance or “passion”! The whole reason this series IS so popular is because of its passion and romance!! And even some of us “adult women” find the old fashion views very attractive and a good piece of advice for the upcoming generation that also enjoys these books! You tended to pick on us women…..why is that?!?! I know SOO many guys who enjoy this series just as much as us women do—one being my husband, and two being my best friends husband—are they also “idiots”??? Seriously, lady, I have NO idea why you decided to slaughter the one good thing that is out in theaters now days—maybe you were unhappy as a child so you must pass along your unhappiness to others, but…..like Rebelchild, I too will be there at opening night of Breaking Dawn (both parts!) along with many, many of my friends and family members! Hope to NOT see you there! Jul 09, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close