Wednesday, July 7, 2010

A Sobering Experience

Neither party is having much fun governing in the 111th Congress.

George Nethercutt

So, what’s the mood in Washington, D.C., these days, as the nation’s capital swelters under hot, humid weather — and political — conditions?

A June Gallup poll pegged President Obama’s approval/disapproval rating at 46 percent, Congress’ at 20 percent approval and confirmed that Americans consider terrorism and federal government debt to be the two most important issues facing our country. By a margin of 79 percent, Americans believe those two issues to be “extremely serious” or “very serious” to the nation’s future. With the national economy recovering at a snail’s pace and the creation of private sector jobs nearly non-existent (Gallup shows a -29 economic confidence index with 18.4 percent of Americans underemployed, and 60 percent forecasting a gloomy economic outlook), I looked to bright young college students for their take on current affairs.

From June 18-26, eight Nethercutt Foundation students from six colleges in Washington, Oregon and Pennsylvania lived in Washington, D.C., immersed in the operations of the federal government. (See the students’ blogs at nethercuttfoundation.org.)

Meeting with numerous Democratic and Republican members of the House and Senate, lobbyists, liberal and conservative think-tank representatives, members of the national press, political pundits, corporate representatives and other D.C. luminaries, the students saw up close how government actually works. They also received an earful about how Congress and the U.S. government don’t work, and how much they need to know about government in order to be informed and engaged Americans, better prepared for future leadership.

As the students discovered, neither Democrats nor Republicans are having much fun governing in the 111th Congress, but most elected officials seem at least to be striving for bipartisan solutions. House members complained about the Senate’s inactivity, yet neither side will yield to the principles that define each political party so clearly in a mid-term election atmosphere. One liberal Democrat expressed bitterness toward Republicans for the way Democrats were treated by party leadership when the Republicans controlled the executive and legislative branches of government, and with the tables turned they’re now paying back the Republicans. The fundamental philosophical differences between the two political parties complicate the goal of bipartisanship.

Therein lies the problem: Most Republicans want to rein in federal spending and cut our debt. Most Democrats want to spend more federal money to reverse the economic recession, expecting economic growth to eventually improve the overall economy and help the nation meet its mounting financial obligations. With record debt levels piling up on our nation, the students realize they will be the beneficiaries — and the victims — of 2010 federal policies. The students were awed by their visit to the Pentagon and sobered by the security challenges that face the United States and the free world.

Visiting the Pentagon Memorial honoring the 184 lives lost there on Sept. 11, 2001, brought home to the students that freedom is not free. When Brian Lamb, founder and head of C-SPAN, quizzed them about the names of past historical figures and even recent political personalities, they realized they didn’t know enough about American history or current events. Their visits to the Smithsonian Institution’s American History Museum and other national monuments shed welcome light on the history that all Americans should know about our country. When they visited the associate ambassador from Switzerland, their eyes were opened even wider to the makeup and complexity of America’s place in the world.

Regardless of their political leanings, the students were able to affirm firsthand the Gallup statistics regarding the Obama presidency and American concerns — they heard references to both — and could draw their own conclusions about the challenges leaders face to solve our nation’s problems — and what leadership qualities they admire.

With public officials predicting a future terrorist attack and with the uncertainty that surrounds our national ability to respond, young adults are rightfully fearful of the security unknowns that plague America today. (Full disclosure: I serve on a congressionally mandated defense panel looking at whether the U.S. is prepared to respond to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive attack. The panel’s findings and recommendations to Congress will be issued by Sept. 15, 2010.)

As the economy lags, the students were advised that Republicans and “new people” will surely gain ground in the 2010 elections. While a complete change of leadership in the House of Representatives (40 seats) is unlikely, they were told it’s still possible.

The prospect of a Republican takeover in the Senate is less than 50-50, even though the Democrats’ margin there will likely be tighter. Without a 2010 Republican takeover, the Obama presidency could be in jeopardy in 2012 because Democrats would still control the legislative branch, unable to blame Republicans for inattention to the problems which plague our nation. And the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq will not get any easier. Nor will the slow economy, immigration reform, Gulf spill cleanup, energy legislation, financial reform or foreign policy in the Middle East, Korea, China or Russia be resolved overnight. And the grinding issue that plagues all debate on all issues — the nation’s debt — will overlay all other issues as voters cast their ballots.

The Nethercutt Foundation students left for home better prepared to meet national public policy challenges with resolve, but stung by the reality that America’s problems are now their problems, too, for they are the nation’s next generation of leaders.

George Nethercutt represented the 5th District of Washington as a Republican in Congress between 1995-2005. His column appears in The Inlander once a month.

Also in Commentary

New Frontiers

While the Old West still feeds the mythology of the region, the New West commands a new paradigm

Michael Dax |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

The Sports Mafia

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By George Nethercutt

Going Dutch

With its enviable waistlines (and lifespans) Holland's two-wheel culture is something America should emulate.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, June 13,2012
Commentary

Civics Lessons

Why studying American history is essential to being a good citizen

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, March 31,2010

Losing a Generation

Millennials who turned out in 2008 may tune this election out.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, April 11,2012

The Emperor Revealed

President Obama seems more and more like Richard Nixon, lost in the trappings of his high office

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, October 9,2012

In the End, It’s a Tax

Now that the president’s health care plan has been exposed by the Supreme Court, America must act

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, July 10,2012


I was terribly upset with nethercutt in 2000 and 2002...but as time does tell, George is a class act. In fact, I dare say, he is too good for the congress. he has a sense of ethics and higher integrity that Cathy McMorris shall never understand while she is young. The very best we have to offer here in the Eastern Washington area is leaders like Nethercutt...Mark Richard.....and a few others like Ozzie Knezovich and Tim Durkin. Jul 10, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Yes, the deficit is frightening, but I don´t know about your statement about ´most´ Republicans wanting to do something about it. It that is so, it is a recent conversion. Before the Republicans lost congress in 2006, they certainly did NOT seem all that concerned about the exploding deficit or about running a very expensive war off budget. Even you, Mr. Nethercutt pooh-poohed my letters of concern about deficit spending and voodoo budgeting. Ms McMorris-Rodgers also dismissed my concerns - saying the growing economy would take care of the deficit, until she was reborn into the minority in congress. Yet, even now when she asks for my help to prevent the Democrat Party from cutting a program she supports, she offers no answer to my request for an offset cut. So, can we all admit that neither party wants to cut spending, and it sure is easy to complain when you are out of power. Oh and, be careful, Republicans, what you wish for - you may gain the majority again. Jul 12, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

I really enjoy the rewrite of history. Remember that we have a defict now because Bush wasted a three trillion dollars on tax cuts for the rich, the war in Iraq, and Medicare part D. Then, he watched as deregulation of the financial system brought on the worst economic crisis since the great depression. The Republicans have filibustered every piece of legislation, even legislation that was passed with bipartisan support in the House because they know that any win for the Democrats is a lose for the Republicans regardless of whether or not it is good for the country. The Tea Party has boiled the Republican party down to the hardest right conservatives like Sharon Angle and Rand Paul so that we are now relitigating the Civil Rights Act and whether or not the Constitution promotes freedom from religion. The Republicans have no desire to actually lead the country in a productive path, but rather win elections to pay back the likes of BP and the health insurance companies. Jul 12, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

In keeping with the editing style of a former employer (right or wrong, I´m right) and however minute the change, I offer the following commentary:

1) 4th paragraph, 3rd and 4th lines: "...the students saw (close up) how government actually works." ("up cose" recalls "up close and personal" - not gonna´ write it - wouldn´t be prudent.)

2) 5th paragraph, 7th and 8th lines: "...and(,) with the tables (now) turned, they’re paying back the Republicans." (Commas add clarity in long sentences, and transposition of word "flows" better.)

3) 6th paragraph, 1st line: "Therein lies the problem: ( m)ost Republicans want to rein in federal spending and cut our debt." (Should be two spaces after colon*, lower case ´m´.)

4) 8th paragraph, lines 3 and 4: "...and could draw their own conclusions about the challenges leaders face to solve our nation’s problems(,) and what leadership qualities they admire." (Dash not needed where a comma will do to complete a thought, and end the sentence.)

5) 9th paragraph, lines 1 and 2: "With public officials predicting a future terrorist attack(,) and with the uncertainty that surrounds our national ability to respond,..." (Comma adds clarity in long sentences.)

6) 9th paragraph, lines 3, 4, and 5: "(Full disclosure: ( I) serve on a congressionally mandated defense panel looking at whether the U.S. is prepared to respond to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive attack. ..." (Two spaces after colon.*)

*The added space after a colon, and only one space between the end of one sentence and the beginning of another throughout, is likely the fault of the computer´s programmer, not the fault of the teacher who taught me to type in ninth grade for the purpose of the "flow" of the sentences. Thanks for the practice in editing. Oct 03, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close