Wednesday, July 28, 2010

The Inlander Responds To Complaints

Reviewing our coverage of police after local agencies lodge complaints of inaccurate and biased reporting

Jacob H. Fries
DOCUMENTS

Download the response from:

• The City of Spokane
• The Spokane County Sheriff's Department

The Spokane Police Lieutenants and Captains Association last week issued a letter to officers and the media extolling the good work of police while complaining about a “slanted perspective” in the local media.

“The time has come to tell the citizens of Spokane in plain language that their police department is a good one,” the letter reads.

The letter cites two recent articles: a June 27 story in the Spokesman-Review and our July 1 cover story, “Strong Arm of the Law,” which examined the process by which local law enforcement agencies handle excessive force complaints. (Most internal investigations end, we found, without finding any officers at fault.)

The article also raised questions about why, in the case of the Spokane Police Department, the city keeps internal reports relating to those complaints secret unless the accused officer is found in the wrong — a policy out of step with procedures at agencies across the state, including the Spokane County Sheriff’s Office.

Eight days before the association sent out its letter, the Spokane police chief, a city attorney, a city spokeswoman and the county sheriff came to Inlander HQ to criticize the article, saying it contained numerous mistakes. The Inlander is committed to publishing accurate information and correcting the record when appropriate, and we asked the officials to provide a list of their issues with our reporting.

Last Friday, 22 days after our article was published, the city and county e-mailed us their separate lists of complaints.

The city’s list runs four pages long and the county’s is two. On the whole, their complaints are generally not about facts or errors, but about word choice and background details we chose not to include in our 5,000-word report. None of their objections countered the central points of our report: that a culture of secrecy continues to pervade the Spokane Police Department; and that the Sheriff’s Office does not maintain a database of complaints against its deputies and relies on the chain of command to track problematic employees.

As an example of their list, we had written that Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich considered his agency’s computer system “highly flawed.” In his list of complaints, the sheriff writes, “I acknowledged that our system is antiquated, that is different from being ‘highly flawed.’”

You can read both the county’s and city’s lists of issues in their entirety by downloading the files from the sidebar above.

Some of their issues with our article, however, did involve factual errors. Along with our own internal review, we uncovered four mistakes that need to be corrected; they are listed below and have already been made to the online version of the story.

The “Strong Arm of the Law” article was published as part of an ongoing series, The Injustice Project, which is committed to exposing miscarriages of justice. Send tips and story ideas to injustice [at] inlander.com or call the news tip line at (509) 325-0634 ext. 264.

Also, since our article was published, Spokane Mayor Mary Verner has said she’ll review the Police Department’s records policies, and we will report on her review in a future issue.

CORRECTIONS

  • In a timeline of high-profile police incidents accompanying the story, we wrote about the shooting of Sidney McDermott in 1994. The item indicated that McDermott had been shot and killed by Officer Tracie Meidl. Meidl had shot at McDermott repeatedly, but missed him. It was Officer Marc Wheelwright, not Miedl, who fatally wounded McDermott.

  • The timeline also reported on the 2007 shooting by Jay Olsen, the off-duty officer who shot Shonto Pete in the head. The item indicated that the city launched an internal investigation “soon after in response to widespread public outrage about [Olsen’s] acquittal.” The public outcry didn’t prompt the investigation; it’s the city’s policy to investigate excessive force complaints.

  • The timeline also indicated Chad Ruff was a city officer, when in fact he is employed by the Sheriff’s Office. A second mention of Ruff, however, did correctly indicate he was a deputy, rather than a city police officer.

  • The article also indicated the Sheriff’s Office took over law enforcement duties in Medical Lake a couple of years ago when, in fact, the Sheriff’s Office began policing that city in December 2009.

Also in News

Calling for Help

A frantic 911 call lands Christopher Parker instead of a hospital, and leads to his death

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Let 'Em Vote

Spokane City Council won’t sue to keep initiatives off of the fall ballot; plus, a new UW-WSU rivalry

Heidi Groover, Deanna Pan, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Reefer Rules

Washington state takes a first pass at marijuana market regulations

Heidi Groover, Lisa Waananen |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Disorderly Conduct

Three Spokane law enforcement officers are placed on leave over misconduct investigations

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Uneven Cuts

Most elements of health care were shielded from the sequester — but not the Indian Health Service

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Also By Jacob H. Fries

For Your Consideration | March 14, 2013

Red Dawn on DVD, iHeartRadio and Tastemade on YouTube

Jacob H. Fries |
Tuesday, March 12,2013

No Way to Win

Prosecutor Steve Tucker sidesteps controversy as he faces off against Democratic challenger Frank Malone.

Jacob H. Fries |
Tuesday, October 19,2010

Democracy In Action

Jacob H. Fries |
Thursday, February 12,2004

The 'Wingnut' Way

Jacob H. Fries |
Wednesday, September 3,2008


Great job Inlander on misinforming the public once again. Take the time to read the rebutals from the Sheriff and the police Chief. Unlike your articles there are no smoke and mirrors here, no slight of hand work just to the point factual answers. All your articles drip with distain for the police which I have to wonder, just how many times has your staff been arrested? I guess the more you write and use words like "alleged" and "according to police" you will engrain your conspiracy theory into some, but not me. I have posted this before but it fits good here too so here it is again. As a proud American who is sick watching this great country crap on the people who actually care to do the right thing, I say go forth and clean up our streets regardless of what these liberals say. Thump some heads if you have to, be an advocate for the victims that can´t/won´t stand up for themselves. We all know the courts won´t do it.





I guess I am on the opposite end of the spectrum, I giggle every time I hear on the news that someone ran from the police and got Tased, or a car thief was taken to the hospital after being taken into custody. Criminals have to respect the law and know why they have to abide by it. Keep it up Inlander, and the vocal minority, crime is going to get way worse, and you will get exactly what you wanted all along, a toothless barking dog with a short leash, behind a tall fence. That should scare the criminals away.





We need good people to make their voices heard. So hear mine as loud as I can type,





"***!!! THANK YOU SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT !!!***"


Jul 29, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

C´mon Inlander. I read both the police and sheriff´s rebuttals and your original article. I think you have quite a few more corrections to make than just the four innocuous ones your "research" have produced. You would be more respected as a publication if you were at least honest here. By the way, word choice sets a tone, and background details are inportant to put an issue into proper perspective. Your word choices drips of disdain, and your background details are inaccurate. Jul 29, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

This is your response to this horrifically flawed article? The only responsible thing done here is to include links to the City´s and County´s rebuttals, which should have been much more critical, and more in depth.





You downplay "word choice" in you rebuttal? Do you not know the effects "word choice" have on a reader? I believe you do and any thinking reader would know what pains were taken to convey your agenda. Please stick to music, art, and food reviews and quit dabbling in journalism. But if you do, be fair and accurate. Jul 29, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

The whole article was extremely flawed in the fact that it does not say what the "victims" were doing prior to the police getting involved. Spewing only partial information does not give the complete picture. This is not journalism, this is yet another attack on our LEO´s. Prayers go out to all our Fallen Officers for they deserve so much more than just our "thanks". Jul 30, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

WELL I SAY BOO HOO TO ALL THE UPSET "POLICE FAMILY MEMBERS" I THOUGHT THE ARTICLE KICKASS AND I WAS GLUED TO MY SEAT. EVEN WITH THE FLAWS. THEY HAD A FEW BUT THE REALITY OF THE ARTICLE WAS WRITE ON. HAVING A FEW BAD APPLES ON THE SQUAD RUIN IT FOR ANY WHO HAVE A HEART... Jul 30, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close