Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Culture Centers and Tax Shelters

Plans for a cultural center near downtown emerge. Plus, tax breaks for dense development.

Joel Smith, Heidi Groover
The cultural center would cost as much as $8 million to build. [Photo: Rendering: Womer ]
The cultural center would cost as much as $8 million to build. [Photo: Rendering: Womer ]
The cultural center would cost as much as $8 million to build. [Photo: Rendering: Womer ]

The Bosch Lot, on the corner of Monroe Street and Bridge Avenue in downtown Spokane, is not much more than concrete dividers, gravel and a “Pay Here” sign next to a fee machine. Someday it could feature a massive two-story building with detailed architecture and a whole lot more than parking spaces.

The Spokane Tribe presented plans for a multi-million dollar cultural center to the Spokane Park Board last week after the board sent out a call for proposals in June. (The tribe was the only respondent.)

The 33,000-square-foot center would feature historical and cultural exhibits, offices, a theater and retail space. The facility could cost up to $8 million, and tribe officials say they plan to get funding from grants, bonds and private funding.

“It’s always been important to the tribe to let the story be told of what went on there before it was settled by Europeans,” says the project’s planning director David Ernst. “Not only that, but what’s going on with contemporary Spokane Tribe presence as well.”

Parking fees on the property currently bring the city’s general park fund about $70,000 a year. The cultural center will have to come close to matching that, likely from the planned retail space, says Spokane Park Board President Ross Kelley.

“It these tough financial times, looking at tough budgets coming up, we can’t afford to lose the amount of money that we’re getting from that lot,” he says.

If a more detailed proposal at the next Park Board meeting later this month is approved, the city will begin drafting a lease and property development agreement. The tribe will be responsible for proving it can secure funding for the facility, and City Council will have the final say.

“After the presentation by the tribe and some [of those] within subcommittees hearing and seeing what is proposed, I have not seen any complaints,” says Bob Apple, the council’s liaison to the Park Board. “But how it will be received by the public will be a big determining factor.” (Heidi Groover)

BUSINESS BOOMING, TAX-FREE

In what Spokane City Councilman Jon Snyder hopes is a good omen for development in Spokane, the council last week unanimously passed a resolution granting an eight-year tax exemption to an eight-unit condo project at Fifth Avenue and Chandler Street, near the Rockwood Clinic and Sacred Heart Medical Center. The project, which consists of two sets of four chi-chi, glass-plated townhouses, will not have to pay taxes on the construction and building improvements (though it will continue to pay taxes on the property) for eight years, because of Washington’s Multi-Family Tax Exemption.

“Just by putting a house or condos on the property, you’re improving the value of the dirt,” says Snyder. “We’ll still get increased taxes on the value of the dirt — just not on the buildings — for eight years.”

The project aims to encourage denser housing in cities, in part because it’s cheaper to provide city services to those areas that are already close-in.

“[The exemption] is for in-fill development, not fringe development,” says Terri Stripes, the city’s business and development coordinator. “This is where we have infrastructure in place.”

The project at Fifth and Chandler is eligible because it lies within both the downtown Central Business District and the University District Revitalization Area.

Snyder thinks it’s a good sign that this and other projects are coming forward for council approval (which is really a formality in the state-initiated process).

“The last couple of years, there haven’t been any of these projects coming forward. Maybe a couple,” he says. “This year, we’ve had [several] that have come forward. … That’s a hopeful sign.”

Stripes says only one business has applied for the exemption in each of the last two years, but already four have been approved this year (the other three are Kendall Yards, the Joel building downtown and a project in the Hamilton Street corridor), and there are other projects that will be coming forward before 2010 is over. (Joel Smith)

Also in Briefs

Trouble Holding Liquor

Sorting out Washington's new booze law. Plus, a new judge, and an uninvited sheriff.

Chris Stein, Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, March 7,2012

Seventh in the Nation

Washington's big gay week. Plus, revolution and a challenge.

Chris Stein |
Wednesday, February 15,2012

Engaged to be Married

Washington mulls gay marriage. Plus, Idaho goes back to the drawing board.

Chris Stein, Daniel Walters, Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, January 25,2012

Reform On

The new Spokane City Council is already taking on the police. Plus, WSU heads to Cuba

Inlander Staff |
Wednesday, January 18,2012

PACs Are the Taliban

Roskelley takes on Mielke. Plus, a building crisis, a Supreme Court smackdown and the quest to end corporate statehood.

Inlander Staff |
Wednesday, January 11,2012

Also By Joel Smith, Heidi Groover

Fireless Wireless

Joel Smith |
Monday, June 2,2008

Blast!

Is Spokane trying to torpedo Missoula’s economy?

Joel Smith |
Tuesday, January 12,2010

Top Two

Joel Smith |
Wednesday, August 6,2008

Milking It

A proposed federal law riles raw-milk proponents in Idaho.

Heidi Groover |
Wednesday, June 15,2011


Bogus Empowerment & Tokenism Participation within Tribal Architecture and Planning?

In the context of Architecture & Planning on aboriginal homelands in Spokane, WA in the last few years, one could argue that much of the Tribal Planning & Design that has been initiated or carried out has been based solely in a Western/Anglo planning framework that is often top-down in nature. In this scenario, the planning involves only a small section of the tribal community, usually political elites or leaders such as tribal councilmen, as well as non-Indian planners and architects. Traditional bottom-up tribal planning genuinely involves the input of the whole tribal community including elders, women, students, college graduates (degrees in Architecture, Planning, Parks & Rec, Tourism), youth, and tribal members with disabilities.

Tokenism Participation occurs when the tribal community involvement is really just a kind of ritual therapy or lip service, when in fact the tribal political elites really have the power, influence, and control all along to steer the project in the image of the tribal elites. This type of tribal planning just goes through the motions in a top-down hierarchy with only token consultation of the community.

Bogus Empowerment occurs when tribal elites let the tribal community think they have a voice and the ability to influence outcomes when in reality the tribal community does not have this influence. Tribal elites such as an individual, elected council or interest group makes the decisions. Unfortunately, people with the power and resources to stop this problem, benefit from the social organization and resource distribution that keeps the tribal elites in power. Thus, they maintain these patterns through control over the selection of tribal elites and socialization (brainwashing) of both elites and nonelites to conform to the status quo.

Furthermore, a major obstacle to more inclusive representation in the tribal Architecture and Planning process is the popular belief that public community participation may be viewed as unnecessary, unwieldy, time consuming, and an idealistic dream. The planning process is also highly "political", where various groups may have their own agenda or may form coalitions in which the balance of power is crucial.

I would look forward to talking about these issues and the sincere need for increased tribal community participation in tribal architecture and planning projects such as the proposed cultural center in downtown Spokane.


Shawn Brigman, Spokane Tribal Membe
Sep 19, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Why not encourage and foster the design of contemporary Spokane Indian architecture connected to the traditional forms of the past, to meet the architectural and spatial needs of the Indigenous people in the city of Spokane, Washington in the present? For a contemporary Indigenous architecture and urban planning agenda to genuinely occur parallel to settler colonialism’s understanding of the city of Spokane, it must include enrolled members of the the Spokane Tribe of Indians with degrees in planning & architecture as primary consultants on design projects. This is not to say that non-Indian architects and consultants can’t collaborate with tribes on the design of Indigenous theme architecture and urban planning elements, but rather they must now step aside and encourage Indigenous Spokane Indian architects and urban planners to begin taking the lead. What is missing is the passion from within the Indigenous community that can be communicated by Indigenous Spokane Indian architects and/or consultants. To reclaim Indigenous architectural space, control and continuity of the artifacts must come from the Indigenous people themselves. Would artwork painted, sculpted, sketched, carved, or worked by a non-Indian artist have the stamp of approval to be considered American Indian artwork? Why should American Indian theme architecture and urban planning elements be any different? It requires multiple acts of love. Sep 19, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

This design is just "Another Brick On the Wall" by Pink Floyd:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_bvT-DGcWw

Is there anything overtly Spokane Indian (aboriginal) about the Architectural Design? For example, does it authentically reflect who we are as this nations "First Planners & Architects" while being rooted in our "Original Instruction" by creator? As a Spokane Tribal member, I advocate tribal Planning & Architecture manifested from the foundations of village planning legacies left to us by our ancestors, "The First Planners"...!!

http://www.planning.org/divisions/indigenous/index.htm Oct 21, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close