Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Kid Crime, Adult Time

How "tough on crime" laws are failing our children.

Kevin Taylor

Layton — and this astonished some people who know him — didn’t fight back. He threw the kid down onto a table and then, “I wrapped him up and waited for staff to come. Walking away is difficult.”

His decision impressed staff at Green Hill and Layton says he made a pitch to be transferred to a different JRA — where he would not have to keep fighting and with better school and job prospects.

“I’m trying to do better, man. I’m trying to get out and be successful. It’s got to start here,” Layton says. “It was very difficult to [break with the gang] because I’ve been around it so much.”

A couple of days after our telephone interview, a Green Hill program director called to say that Layton had been transferred.


COUNTY TIME

Meanwhile, The Inlander discovered an unexpected and disturbing aspect of automatic declination in Allison Wessling’s case.

Remember that only 14 of 122 auto-decline cases were returned to juvenile courts? Does this mean, we wondered, that Spokane County has sent up to 108 kids into penitentiaries in the last few years?

Not likely. When young offenders are convicted as adults, they are held in two of the juvenile prisons — Green Hill for males, Echo Glenn for females — until they turn 18 (21 in some cases), and then are assessed for transfer into adult penitentiaries. The two facilities have only 65 beds, combined, for auto-declines, Griffith says.

So where do all these kids go?

Emerging anecdotal evidence suggests that they are kept in county jails.

Sorting out the data in automatic declinations is frustrating, even to investigators and number-crunchers at the governor’s Office of Juvenile Justice and the state Sentencing Guidelines Commission.

In other words, nobody really knows how many 16- and 17-year-olds are pulling time in county jails.

Eight Reforms

The following are reforms suggested by the Washington Coalition for the Just Treatment of Youth.

1. Eliminate life without parole as a sentence for adolescent offenders.

2. Create a juvenile-specific review process for periodic review of youth sentenced in the adult system.

3. Eliminate automatic decline.

4. Set 15 as the age below which no adolescent may be transferred to the adult system.

5. Create a system to transfer youth back to juvenile court when appropriate.

6. Require that youth be held in juvenile facilities pre-trial and post-conviction until age 21.

7. Refocus efforts on prevention and rehabilitation.

8. Ensure policies and practices are culturally competent and gender-responsive.

“You should tell your readers these numbers are all estimates,” says Keri-Anne Jetzer, a research investigator with the Washington Sentencing Guidelines Commission.

Like Jetzer, “We have not found a single agency that tracks these numbers,” says Beth Colgan, attorney with the Columbia Legal Foundation in Seattle.

“I am not familiar with the number of auto-declines serving time in county jails,” Griffith says. He hopes it is not becoming an institutionalized choice. “It’s not set up for long-term treatment. It is more punishment-oriented.”

County jail is where we met Allison Wessling, wearing a dark green jumpsuit and with dark, rumpled hair behind the thick glass in a claustrophobic visiting booth. She has distinctly pale skin that hasn’t felt sun in over a year.

Wessling and her pals, after the beer run fiasco, traveled to Worley in North Idaho. She was planning on running away to California the next morning with a BFF who lives on the Coeur d’Alene rez, but they caught the attention of security at Coeur d’Alene Tribal Casino and were quickly detained.

“[Security officers] were driving around the parking lot looking for anything suspicious and we were high and didn’t realize how stupid we looked,” she says.

She was eventually taken back to Spokane, where she was surprised to be booked into the jail and housed in the women’s maximum-security unit known as the Dog Pound. She has been in the jail 14 months, with two to go.

“Frankly, I was scared,” she says, when a prosecutor outlined her adult charges and later told her that she could face six additional first-degree assault charges, plus gun enhancements — a potential 30-year sentence — unless she took a plea deal.

Wessling pleaded guilty to three charges, reduced from the original but still Class A felonies. She gets out just before Halloween.

When she first went in, in June 2009, Wessling says inmates had two hours of free time in the mornings and two more at night. Now, with so many cutbacks to jail staff, inmates are typically out of their cells only 80 minutes a day. Other kids we’ve talked to note that the jail is frequently locked down so the undermanned staff can keep a lid on things.

There are some paperback books she can check out from a shelf in her unit, Wessling says. But no TVs, no school, no vocational training, no substance abuse counseling.

Wessling assessed her future in an interview conducted via a scratchy intercom.

“Being in a facility surrounded by people who are doing bad … that’s all they talk about, that’s how they live. You are surrounded by it every day. All they do is talk about their cases or smoking meth or robbing,” Wessling says.

Wessling says she’d like to stay out for good, but she also offered a critical self-examination.

“The thing with me is, I’ll do good, or I’ll try to do good and I’ll not get what I’m going for and I’ll get discouraged and fall back into what’s comfortable,” she says.

Colgan from the Columbia Legal Foundation says kids doing sentences in county jails are serving time in the worst possible way for juveniles. Even penitentiaries have clubs and counseling and classes.

And sentences being plea-bargained down to a year or less points out a failing — or a misuse — of the automatic declination process.

“This begs the question: If the sentences are that short, why are they not in juvenile court in the first place?” Colgan asks.

Youth in county jails also come out with adult Class A felonies — Wessling will have three — that never can be removed from their records. Juvenile Class A felonies — thanks to a reform pushed through the Legislature last year — can now be sealed after five years, in most cases.

Again, Colgan asks: “Do we want to make it difficult for kids to get a job or go to college? Do we want to make it difficult for them to be successful when they get out? Is this really serving the public interest?”


IN THE BEGINNING

The creation of a separate juvenile justice system in Washington in the 1970s was all about rehabilitation. Kids were treated differently than adults, younger kids differently than older kids. The focus was more on education than retribution. It was the New Testament God, not the Old.

Then came Columbine and Crips and Bloods and — thanks in part to breathless media coverage and political grandstanding — lawmakers promised to crack down on violent youth. People became afraid of teenagers.

All across America in the 1990s, laws allowing automatic declination were passed. Suddenly it was OK to toss minors into penitentiaries. Arizona, in 2008, charged an 8-year-old as an adult for two murders.

The youngest in Washington was 11. A 13-year-old in Washington was sentenced to life without parole.

A recent story out of Colorado noted that the juvenile crime rate in that state didn’t increase a whit during a period of high-profile media coverage of violent youth crime in 1993, dubbed by the media as the “summer of violence.”

In Washington, the overall juvenile crime rate has been declining since 1994, the same year the Legislature passed the Violent Crimes Reduction Act, which allows for automatic declination.

So it’s working, then?

“The recidivism rates are going through the roof,” says Bonnie Bush, administrator of Spokane County Juvenile Court Services. “We are maybe doing more harm sending kids over to the adult side.”

When the Violent Crimes Reduction Act was passed, “The Legislature saw this as an opportunity to say, ‘We are tough on crime’ without thinking through the impact of this,” says George Yeannakis, attorney with Team Child in Seattle and a leading voice for juvenile justice reform.

Legislators initially created a short list of violent crimes in which any kid 16 or 17 who was charged with one of them would go straight to adult court. The law was expanded in 1997 by adding more crimes to the list.

At least the 1994 law was heavily debated in the Legislature, was strictly limited and was passed as an experiment, Yeannakis says. The 1997 expansion passed with little debate and no evidence of what effect, if any, the law had on crime, he says. (In Idaho, juveniles can only be transferred into adult court for a short list of severe crimes.)

By 2000, Yeannakis adds, studies began to show that harsher adult punishment for juveniles was not working.

“Everybody knows that kids are different. I think the Legislature knows this, too. The study had a lot of disclaimers, but it said transferring more kids into the adult system did not have an impact on [reducing] violent crime,” Yeannakis says.

At the same time, research across the nation continues to show that human brains are not fully developed until we reach our 20s.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a decision that banned death penalties for juveniles, wrote in the majority opinion, “From a moral standpoint it would be misguided to equate the failings of a minor with those of an adult, for a greater possibility exists that a minor’s character deficiencies will be reformed.”

The justices, according to Colgan, the Seattle attorney with Columbia Legal Services, “drew three distinctions between adolescents and adults. First, the court recognized youth are comparatively more immature than adults, [which] may lead to reckless behavior. Second, the court noted that youth are more susceptible than adults to negative influences such as peer pressure. Third, the court recognized that personality traits of youth are in flux, leaving time for additional character formation.”

Colgan was writing the above in a 2009 report (pdf) assessing the state’s juvenile justice system and calling for specific reforms. (See “Eight Reforms" sidebar.)

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court also banned juveniles from being sentenced to life without parole for crimes other than homicide.

“Chief Justice John Roberts said that, because of adolescent brain development findings … he agreed with four others that you can’t put a kid away forever,” Yeannakis says. “We’re getting that kids are less developed than adults.”

Even as research showing that adolescents have very different decision-making capabilities than adults is becoming unassailable — even to the conservative chief justice — attempts to abolish automatic declines seem far away in Washington.

“What we run into when bills are offered to change the system is an almost reflex action of many legislators who do not want to be seen as soft on crime,” says Democratic Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson of Seattle. “There is a failure to recognize that although these juveniles may have committed very serious crimes, it’s not the same as a 26-year-old committing those crimes. … Kids are different than adults.”


COVER_INL_JustinCairns080610_MG_0217.jpg

"I sat and listened to the charges and said, 'You guys must have the wrong person. I'm not that kind of guy who would do that stuff.'" — Justin Cairns, who was arrested at 16

SMALL-TOWN BOY

Justin Cairns is 19 now, a big kid with a friendly face who carries himself with the sort of demeanor that prompts observers to think: “Nice Young Man.”

But Cairns didn’t come across as such a nice kid nearly three years ago when a prosecutor read off a list of severe adult crimes that carried, he learned to his shock, a sentence of eight years in state prison.

Before then, the 16-year-old farm boy from Reardan (who lived with his grandparents) had never before been arrested for anything. But in high school, he began to experience the more oppressive side to small-town life: “Too many people know your business.”

Partly out of rebellion, Cairns started buying — and later shoplifting— cough and cold medicine. After users chug a bottle, the active ingredient, dextromethorphan, creates a long-lasting high that brings an expansive sense of well-being, hallucinations and an altered sense of time.

“It’s powerful. I saw it as this ‘next-world’ thing,” Cairns says. “I went downhill really fast.”


Next Page: A Pullman woman has to fight the system to save herself.

Continue reading: Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 |

Also in News

Calling for Help

A frantic 911 call lands Christopher Parker in a jail cell instead of a hospital, and leads to his death

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Let 'Em Vote

Spokane City Council won’t sue to keep initiatives off of the fall ballot; plus, a new UW-WSU rivalry

Heidi Groover, Deanna Pan, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Reefer Rules

Washington state takes a first pass at marijuana market regulations

Heidi Groover, Lisa Waananen |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Disorderly Conduct

Three Spokane law enforcement officers are placed on leave over misconduct investigations

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Uneven Cuts

Most elements of health care were shielded from the sequester — but not the Indian Health Service

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Also By Kevin Taylor

Book Review

'The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest,' Stieg Larsson

After nearly 1,800 pages, the Millennium Trilogy fails to pull off a satisfying conclusion.

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, June 30,2010

Sewer Monster?

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, August 20,2008
News Briefs

Munson's Legacy

Remembering a Founding Father of Spokane Valley. Plus, a trip to the White House.

Daniel Walters, Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, January 5,2011

Earning Pollution Credits

Ecology bids to include “pollution trading” as part of cleanup plan

Kevin Taylor |
Friday, February 5,2010

Fire Drill

Spokane Valley firefighters beat the world. Plus, Idaho follows Wisconsin.

Kevin Taylor, Nicholas Deshais, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, March 9,2011


All these little monsters should be turned into worm food. A hanging once a year in front of each Jr. High and High School would straighten these social miscreants up most ricky tick. Sep 09, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Wow you sound very educated. You are very offensive and no one appreciates your comments. Sep 17, 2010

 

Innocent until proven guilty is contradicted by automatic declination.Sending a juvenille to adult court is saying they are guilty of something already.If a juror is in an adult courtroom and a juvenille is brought in in,they know it isnt for shoplifting a a pack of gum.

Remember back to when you were a kid,remember the things you did that were stupid,illegal or not.Would you still do them now?
They are still growing and learning,they feel indestructible.They have not seen their parents and loved ones pass away,been in close calls that make you realize life is fragile.

Automatic declination is against the law,against common sense.Every Juvenille involved in something has a reason,has a story.



Sep 10, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

I guess when I was a kid, "stupid things" did not include ARMED ROBBERY, ASSAULT, CAR JACKING, BURGLARY, RAPE OR MURDER.

Being caught with a gun, in a stolen car with stolen property is probably a good reason to be in "adult court" and does not imply guilt. Sep 14, 2010

 

I agree with DISCO 100%
It is VERY easy to get in trouble these days. And putting them in adult court and ruining their lives is not the way to handle it.

Spokoresident,
Well we arent ´back in your day´ anymore..
its a little bit more complicated now. Sep 17, 2010

 

Im really bothered by this story how the judge neal Rielly said it makes no sense to send these kids to adult prison makes them better criminals , honestly that was my line to him and also to steve tucker who agrees with the judge , both of them tryed my son as an adult they kept him in county jail when he was 16 years old , I begged and pleaded with them to try him as a juvanile or take him back there he was in county for 2 years until he turned 18 these so called people ack like they care but thats a bunch of bowl .this makes me sick they are lying if you think they care .my son is proof of that .so people honestly dont believe what you see because they are fake , but i can honestly tell you that prison is no place for these kids something does need to be done with our justice system and changes need to be done they are trying these kids as adults .they have no idea what they will be come later you think it is bad know its going to be much worse they are making them into professional criminals.I tryed to talk with neal rielly and steve tucker even after my son got a long sentence to get some closure for our family they Ignored me they didnt care .and they say these kids are being sexually assaulted i tryed to tell these idiots that .like i said they dont care.



Sep 10, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Once again, Kevin Taylor does the homework necessary to write an accurate and fair protrayal. "OnTheInside" sounds he might have spent quite some time on the actual inside of a jail cell, where he apparently learned nothing except for the art of hyperbole and wild exxageration. Disco makes a good point. Caleb 123 also points out the supreme inadequacies of our current prosecutor, Steve Tucker, who will likely lose re-election this year, largely due to inaction and indifference...not to mention the fact he is under active investigation by former sheriff Tony Bamonte (Idaho). In his most recent book, Bamonte shows why.... after 1000 pages of well documented evidence.... Tucker is accused of something akin to a "RICO" charge (which is often used by gvt to accuse mafia of corrupt organizational activity. *Just yesterday*, county clerk Tom Fallquist told county commissioners that he was likely to end ECR soon (ECR is aka Early-Case-Resolution). Fallquist went on to add that he no longer feels honest and good about taking his oath this year because he does not have enough funding to represent those with lower incomes that often are relegated to a public defender or the clerks office for "Pro SE" help and filing requests. AND, why does some of this happen ? Well, part of it is the fact that Tucker uses criteria many other prosecutors never use in order to try cases that he deems necessary which many or most prosecutors would never try. There are cases in Spokane County where men with no criminal record are tried for a silly harrassment case which has no merit...only to spend almost 200 grand on lawyers...then after Prosecutor Tucker realizes he will lose the case and have to reimburse the "victim"...after 450 days he offers three misdemeanors. Imagine that...a man with no criminal history is offered a small slap on the hand after 450 days of epic failure by Tucker and his staff. How do I know this ? It happened to me...and it is still happening to me now...and we are closing in on 600 days now. The trial starts on Oct 4th, but Tucker will try to strecth it beyond then because this case will embarrass him and his re-election efforts. They already tried to stall it for another month, but Judge Moreno smacked them upside the legal forehead. PEOPLE, understand this, your prosecutor is up for re-election...while he is being seriously investigated by a famous and well respected former sheriff and author. What does that tell you ? It should tell you to vote for Frank malone, but the sad part is that most Spokane voters know nothing about local politics. They vote party line...which gives a terrible leader a chance for yet another 4 years of wasting taxpayer money while violating the rights of good citizens like me. It is a sad state of affairs....but then, politiciams are known for not being highly truthful. Lawyers are known to be even worse. Tucker is both a lawyer and "politician". He also happens to be a former cop...in a city where cops and former cops get away with killing mentally ill janitors and well respected pastors. AH YESSSS ....Spokane, home to the police officers who kill without concern for life or respect for citizens. You might say they have a "License to kill". 007. BTW, while the cops continue to kill at a huge rate statewide...guess what...gun sales are skyrocketing. Do you feel safe when you see a cop ? I know I don´t. I am afriad they might taser me just for the thrill. They know they are above the law so long as Tucker and Kirkpatrick run the show. The only hope we have is sheriff Ozzie..or a well artmed citizenry rising up against the cops and saying "enough is enough". Something must be done to keep the people safe from the killer cops. A new law must be written and we need region"OMBUDSMEN" with outside investigative authority and subpoena power. Not to mention that we, the people of Spokane, need a special investigator to look into cops as killers and prosecutors as "protectors" of bad cops.
-
David Howard Elton
509-999-2569
(see www.CAMASmagazine.com or www.CORRUPTIONinSPOKANE.com)...they tell a story that would make Stephen King shudder in terror. Sep 11, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

David 99 you make some good points as well
.
I dont believe there was any exaggertion in this article,it is just the truth that people would rather not see.Problems like this are not a problem in peoples eyes until it happens to their children.

This is the kind of thing that needs to be brought out and seriously thought about.We can look at the world today and the society around us and look at the truth,but it will never be addressed unless it will get someone re elected.Thats politics,its a job.

Kids getting tossed in adult prisons isnt a job,its a reality that needs to not exhist in the future.This article touches on another misjustice in the legal system.,the archaic felony murder rule.

I go to a store with my friends with the intention to buy a lottery ticket but once we get inside I change my mind.I go over and buy a Dr.Pepper while they each go up and buy a lottery ticket.A few days later along comes the drawing and one of my friends has all the only winning ticket !Does that mean we all win?I mean we all went there with the intention to buy a lottery ticket right?...or will they just give the money to the person who actually had the winning ticket ?We all know the answer.

Now you and your friends go out to rob a store ,one of your friends has an unloaded gun.The weapon goes off killing an employee,who is guilty?

It is done during a felony so it is murder ,you knowingly going to commit a felony are guitly of the same crime as the person that shoots the weapon.You are guilty of murder.

Overcrowding in prison happens why ?
They send kids and adults to jail for crimes they know they never committed.With the economy getting worse non violent offenders are let out over and over again.Our system lets people they know will re offend out early and keeps in people they know didnt commit a crime.

We are killing our future .


Sep 13, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Very well said, Mr. Disco.
-
It is truly ironic...kids ar going to jail while cops kill innocent folks (preachers and janitors)....Any justice ? NOPE
-
SAD
-
Dangerous. Sep 13, 2010

 

How could locking up the scum of a society possibly kill "our future"?

None of the losers in the story has a snowballs chance in hell of ever landing a job or paying a dollar in taxes.

The girl will be squirting out welfare babies in short order and the little armed robber will be flunking his GED test for the third time and heading for the nearest dope dealer 30 minutes after his release.

Whatever they do, they will have some random excuse. 1. Momma didn´t love them. 2. Daddy was a drunk who beat them. ( if you look at their behavior, you understand why daddy beat them) 3. They had a friend who died and it threw them off track.

Several years ago a read a DoJ study that said the average criminal does about $500,000 dollars a year in damage to society when out of jail. Locking these losers up for life saves money.

They get all the benefits they would require when out of jail. We(the taxpaying public) will have to put them in a HUD house or project, pay their medical, SNAP pays their heat, food stamps and food banks to feed them, bus passes to transport them to parole officers and doctors, cops to arrest them as they have no reasoning ability and will cause disturbances every time they drink or have cash, courts to regulate their behavior and who knows how much damage they cause when they commit crimes and destroy lives.

Now, jail is the perfect solution. As the author said, they are unable to reason or make decisions because they have misformed brains. So we can let the jailers decide for them, they get three free hot meals, a FREE warm bed, free TV, free gym membership, free medical, free education and if they are inclined to do something other than enjoy the comfort of a warm snuggly prison cell, they can get a job and make money for snacks and sodas.

Jail is the perfect place for some people. Sep 14, 2010

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close