After eight years in state government, John Ahern was turned out of office by a mere 72 votes in favor of newcomer John Driscoll in the state House election for the 6th District in 2008.
A 72-vote loss (it was 74 before an automatic hand-recount) for a Republican in 2008 amounts to clinging ferociously by your fingernails against the blue wave that swept Barack Obama to the White House and Democrats in general to major gains.
But two years later, in the grip of a stubborn recession, the political waves are crashing to the right and the electorate is charged with an anti-incumbent sentiment.
With Ahern and Driscoll running in a rematch, the question here is which incumbent — the old or the new — is in a better spot?
“I knocked on a door a couple of weeks ago and an older gentleman answered,” the 75-year-old Ahern recalls. “‘Ahern,’ he says, ‘I understand you were in for eight years.’ Yes, I said. ‘But you are not the incumbent?’ No, I said. ‘Well then, you’ve got my vote,’ he said.”
Driscoll, who polled at 41 percent in the threeway August primary (against Ahern and moderate Republican Shelly O’Quinn), says he is running as if he is 10 points behind.
“There is no doubt the mood of voters is moving toward the conservative side. I believe my position as a moderate Democrat aware of business issues allows me to maybe go against the national trend,” Driscoll, 52, says.
Both men say they hear plenty of angst about jobs and the recession while out ringing doorbells, and both expect the race to be close once again.
Does the electorate’s sour mood favor the former four-term incumbent Ahern, who finished roughly 3,000 votes behind Driscoll in the primary and has raised only $31,000?
Or will voters give a nod to Driscoll, a moderate Democrat opposed to raising taxes and who has attracted $149,000 in campaign funding?
The candidate who prevails will be the one who more successfully woos the 10,000 votes that went to O’Quinn in the primary. Do they break toward Driscoll along moderate lines, or for: Ahern along party lines? O’Quinn, who works for Greater Spokane, Incorporated (the chamber of commerce), is prohibited by her employer’s policy from endorsing any candidate.
“When I was out doorbelling, a lot of people thought John Ahern was still in office. He definitely has significant name recognition,” O’Quinn says. “I honestly can’t speak for my supporters, but I do think I had a coalition of support. I think you will see a lot of them go for John Ahern [as Republicans], but we also drew a lot of independents.”
The district itself is in flux, she says.
“The demographic is changing dramatically. The median age is 34 with 1.4 children and over 70 percent with at least some college education. It is becoming a very young district. It is moving to be a more moderate district, but it still leans right,” O’Quinn says.
The
Republican legacy of the 6 th District favors Ahern, especially in a
year where a backlash against Democrats is expected. But the district’s
youth and moderation — plus the reality that more than 95 percent of
incumbents retain their seats — favor Driscoll.

I’m tired of this lie being repeated. Someone needs to investigate why GSI (which takes taxpayer dollars) is in violation of the law (RCW 42.17.680(2)) and of Shelly’s right to free speech and free association, (1st Amendment).
Either Rich Hadley needs to be investigated or perhaps this is another inconvenient “mistruth” from the O’Quinn Campaign, similar to her Campaign Manager’s lies about polling data during the primary.
Seems like something a reporter could look into. Hmmm, If only I knew who to call…
Secondly why bother quoting her at all? She is irrelevant to the story, unless the goal was to remind us all of her failure to endorse John Ahern. Was that your purpose here?
RCW 42.17.680
Limitations on employers or labor organizations. (Effective until January 1, 2012.)
(2) No employer or labor organization may discriminate against an officer or employee in the terms or conditions of employment for (a) the failure to contribute to, (b) the failure in any way to support or oppose, or (c) in any way supporting or opposing a candidate, ballot proposition, political party, or political committee. At least annually, an employee from whom wages or salary are withheld under subsection (3) of this section shall be notified of the provisions of this subsection
Oct 14, 2010 | Reply to this comment
John Driscoll is not a typical “Tax and Spend Liberal.” Rather belongs to a club of Over-Tax and Over-Spend Liberals, and he and his party are perfect examples of what is wrong with our state.
Why did we (the taxpayers) spend $22,000 a day for extra session work? It was because John Driscoll and his party refused to attempt to balance the budget properly during the regular session. Then, after a few weeks at $22k per day, they raised our taxes by nearly $1 billion dollars, and still didn’t balance the budget. Why? Because they are incompetent at their duties.
In short, we had to pay them extra so they could balance the budget. Instead, they over-charged us, over-taxed us, and then they over spent the tax increases so much that we still don’t have a balanced budget.
Drsicoll is as liberal as they come, despite his portrayal, protests and advertizing claims of independence. His tacit approval of his party strategies and tactics are visible for every voter in the 6th district. He´s as far to left as Lisa Brown, Gregoire, Murray and Cantwell. Sure, he’s had a few votes that his party was able to cover for him, but the people are smarter than he and the far left credit them
His record is there for all to see, and it doesn’t stop with the voting record.
In the last two years we’ve experienced record unemployment, record tax increases, a record budget deficit, yet still managed record growth in the size of government and record pay increases for government employees. The Democrat Party, who have held majorities in both houses of congress at both the state and federal level for at least the last 6 years are responsible for these records. Budgets always begin in the House. It’s just that simple.
Some people support John Driscoll and think that´s good enough, but I know we deserve better! Some people say Driscoll is not responsible for the tax hikes, the over-spending, and the over-growth of government. I say the proof is there for all to see.
It’s time to replace John Driscoll with a true representative of the people. Let’s replace him with a veteran, one who is an owner/operator of his own small business and understands and supports the principles of a limited government with a reduced budget.
That Man would be John Ahern. Let’s return Ahern, and return some fiscal sanity to Olympia.
Oct 14, 2010 | Reply to this comment