Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Case Closed?

Shonto Pete suffers another setback in his search for justice.

Kevin Taylor
Shonto Pete
Shonto Pete
Shonto Pete

"Hi, this is Shonto Pete, the guy who got shot in the head …” The voicemail we received last week was blunt. Three years after he was shot in the back of the head while trying to escape a drunk, off-duty cop who was chasing him with a drawn handgun, the courts had failed Shonto Pete.

Federal Judge Edward Shea last week granted a motion by former Spokane Police Officer Jay Olsen’s attorney to dismiss a $750,000 civil suit filed by Pete. The judge was apologetic, telling Pete he had already been granted an extra 100 days to find an attorney.

Pete says he thought he would still be able to represent himself and was taken aback by what seems to him an abrupt dismissal.

The decision is apparently final — various statutes of limitations have expired — though Pete says he will continue to examine his options. He has previously lost a criminal case, when a Spokane jury acquitted Olsen.

Pete’s ability to find an attorney in his civil case was hampered when the judge released the City of Spokane from the suit. The city successfully argued Olsen was off-duty and not representing the city at the time of the shooting in late February 2008.

Without the city, and without chance of an insurance payout for a deliberate shooting, the money piece was gone.

“Shonto Pete put his faith in the system. It is totally unjust that the city didn’t step up and pay his medical bills. I think they still can,” local civil rights attorney Breean Beggs says.

Both Mayor Mary Verner and City Administrator Ted Danek say they doubt the city — even now, when all liability has been dismissed — can pay Pete’s medical bills, some $20,000.

“That would be a gift of public funds,” Verner says. “The fact that it was a city bullet is too much of a stretch to pay his medical bills. It is emotionally appealing, but a city can’t just pick an individual and pay his medical bills with taxpayer funds.

“Personally, I think Jay Olsen should pay his bills,” Verner says.

Pete says that he reached out to Olsen’s attorneys in the run-up to the civil suit.

“One of my offers to them was to settle out of court. I asked them to just pay my medical bills. And I never heard any response to that,” he says.

Verner says she will work with urban Indian leaders to set up a fund for Shonto Pete.

“I would be glad to contribute to the extent that I can,” Verner says. “I know Shonto Pete and his family. I know medical bills can be daunting.”

But more than money, she adds, “I think an apology would go a long way. I think one thing that irks them so deeply is that no sense of remorse has ever been expressed.”

Pete says he won’t hold his breath. He has not encountered Olsen — outside of various courtrooms, that is — in the three years since the frightening pre-dawn chase through downtown streets and over the steep embankment into Peaceful Valley, where the bleeding man found shelter.

“He has never talked [publicly] about any of this,” Pete says.

Also in News

Calling for Help

A frantic 911 call lands Christopher Parker in a jail cell instead of a hospital, and leads to his death

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Let 'Em Vote

Spokane City Council won’t sue to keep initiatives off of the fall ballot; plus, a new UW-WSU rivalry

Heidi Groover, Deanna Pan, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Reefer Rules

Washington state takes a first pass at marijuana market regulations

Heidi Groover, Lisa Waananen |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Disorderly Conduct

Three Spokane law enforcement officers are placed on leave over misconduct investigations

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Uneven Cuts

Most elements of health care were shielded from the sequester — but not the Indian Health Service

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Also By Kevin Taylor

From the ’Kan to the ’Stan

Photographer Holly Pickett never had to worry about mortars while shooting high school football games in Spokane Valley

Kevin Taylor |
Friday, November 20,2009

Tucker: No Charge in Zehm Death

Karl Thompson won't face criminal charges

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, October 4,2006

Missing Piece

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, November 16,2005

Time to Fly

Kevin Taylor |
Friday, June 3,2005

Late-Night Talk

Last week's marathon council meeting ended without a vote on powers for the police ombudsman.

Kevin Taylor |
Wednesday, June 23,2010


I´ve complained about an illegal search, a lying cop, and a couple pigs that decided to harass me at my own place of employment. The police in Spokane care nothing about the public and resent anyone who questions them. After the first complaint I made against the Spokane police, I was branded with a classification "t9" which is a warning to officers that I´m anti-police. I look at it as another reason to harass me. Therefore, I don´t think justice for Shonto Pete or anyone will happen at the hands of the SPDs sorry excuse for internal affairs and jurys will continue to acquit crooked cops. It´s our job as the public to take back our city from these worthless thugs we call police. I believe we should start refusing them entrance to our properties, homes, and businesses. Make them get warrants or document probable cause but DON´T give them any cooperation they aren´t legally entitled to. If the police ask any questions,(regardless of purpose or subject) they should be referred to legal council or given silence as a response. All traffic tickets should be fought to the fullest extent including subpoenaing the officer(s) who wrote the citation so that it costs more than it´s worth for the city to use us as a source of revenue for police services. The Police have forgotten that they need our cooperation and trust. The police of Spokane have done everything they can to betray that trust and merit our contempt. I believe we should be the ones shooting them and hitting them with our cars. Mar 12, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

This is a case that´s always bothered me, the lack of follow-up or fallout internally and even from the media is embarrassing to us as a city. Even by the cop´s own story, this is still a case where an off-duty police officer chased a man through a public neighborhood, physically assaulted him, and then drunkenly shot him IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD. If this was anyone other than a police officer, they´d be in jail.

Olsen being allowed to avoid interview for shooting someone in the head for two days, the 911 tape mysteriously lost, but conveniently the dispatcher is suddenly available to testify during the trial (where was this guy during the criminal trial two years earlier against Pete?), the complete lack of effort by the prosecution (a key witness wasn´t even CALLED in as the prosecution felt it´d be too much trouble, through the witness says he would have gladly come in). The embarrassing sight of police officers cheering as Olsen was acquitted. This wasn´t just an off-duty cop, it was a systematic abuse of power that it has been and continues to be brushed aside by the mechanisms that are supposed to act as "checks" against this kind of behavior is indicative of what we as a city stand for. Mar 14, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

The initial event and the following circumstances of Mr. Pete´s ordeal make me feel physically ill. Not being able to seek recourse for his injury is the icing on the cake of this entire debacle. This is an insult to everyone who calls our community home, because this is apparently justice under the law: get shot in the head and get stuck with the bill. Sickening. Mar 15, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close