Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Vaccine Haters

More people opt out of vaccination in Washington than in any other state - the numbers are even higher in Spokane.

Daniel Walters

Sara Griffith saw children die of measles when she served in the Peace Corps in West Africa. “It’s horrendous,” says Griffith, now a school nurse in Spokane.

But in America, it’s safer. We vaccinate.

Except this year, the United States was hit with the largest measles outbreak in over a decade. Since January, there have been 118 cases, leading to 47 hospitalizations. And nearly 90 percent of those infected weren’t vaccinated, reports the Centers for Disease Control.

Some of those cases were in Washington state, which, at 6.2 percent, has the highest percentage of kindergartners in the nation opting out from at least one required vaccination. And Spokane County’s rate is even worse. From 2006 to 2010, the county’s vaccination opt-out rate hovered around 9 percent, more than triple its 1997 rate. So why aren’t parents choosing to vaccinate their kids, and what can be done to raise the number of vaccinated children?

One possible contributor: In Washington state, opting out is a cinch. Many states only allow exemptions for religious reasons, or require written explanations. But in Washington, it only takes a parent’s signature.

Meanwhile, over the past three decades, getting vaccinated has become more complicated. The vaccination schedule has tripled in length. Entirely new vaccinations, like those for chicken pox, are now required. (Fewer children in Spokane County received the chicken pox vaccination than any other required vaccination.) Harried parents, health officials speculate, may just want to duck the hassle.

“It’s hard to tell the difference between a real philosophical exemption, and a convenience exemption,” says Kathe Reed-McKay, health services director for Spokane Public Schools. The Spokane Regional Health Department found that some parents had actually vaccinated their children but showed up to register their kids for school without the proper vaccination paperwork, and so they simply signed an exemption for sake of ease.

That’s why, this year, the state Legislature passed bills requiring a doctor’s signature for exemption from vaccination, providing proof that the doctor ran through the risks and benefits of vaccination.

Some opposed the bill, including virtually all of Spokane’s Republican legislators. And while home-school students won’t be affected, the Home School Legal Defense Association called the bill an “attack on parents’ rights to decide whether they should immunize their children.”

“Sometimes physicians are not willing to sign a release unless their belief system is similar to their parents,” says the association’s staff attorney, T. J. Schmidt.

The highest immunization exemption rates in Spokane come from private schools and home school-public school partnerships.

“Homeschooling parents by their very nature … would seem to be more open to medical alternatives,” Schmidt says.

Over 54 percent of the kindergartners at St. Michaels School weren’t fully vaccinated, according to the Washington State Department of Health. At Valley Christian, it’s 50 percent. At Cheney Home Works, 53 percent. Compare these to the public schools with some of the highest rates: At Jefferson Elementary, only about 11 percent of the kindergartners this year weren’t fully vaccinated. At Roosevelt Elementary, it’s around 25 percent.

“The families that we serve have very particular concerns around the health and welfare and schooling of their children,” says Shannon Lawson, Cheney Home Works program director.
Yet, nationally, with all types of schools, numbers have increased.

“I do believe there has been an increase in true personal exemptions,” Reed-McKay says. “That was based in the inaccurate research for the association between autism and measles vaccine. Parents are concerned.”

Last year, a national poll conducted by C.S. Mott’s Children Hospital found “vaccine safety” was the No. 1 priority for parents when it came to children’s health research.

“I really don’t try to sway people. I just want people to be informed,” says Griffith, the school nurse. “I think it’s very hard for every parent, after they have a newborn, to face injections on their child.”

She says the campaign to vaccinate needs to be an emotional one, focused on protecting the child. And it’s not just a matter of preventing five days of chicken pox misery, she says. Schools serve more students with suppressed immune systems — kids who can’t get vaccines and are very vulnerable to disease — than ever.

“There are children all over this earth who do die of those diseases,” Griffith says.

Also in News

Calling for Help

A frantic 911 call lands Christopher Parker in a jail cell instead of a hospital, and leads to his death

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Let 'Em Vote

Spokane City Council won’t sue to keep initiatives off of the fall ballot; plus, a new UW-WSU rivalry

Heidi Groover, Deanna Pan, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Reefer Rules

Washington state takes a first pass at marijuana market regulations

Heidi Groover, Lisa Waananen |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Disorderly Conduct

Three Spokane law enforcement officers are placed on leave over misconduct investigations

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Uneven Cuts

Most elements of health care were shielded from the sequester — but not the Indian Health Service

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Also By Daniel Walters

But Will It Work?

That’s the question looming around the property tax plan to reduce dropout rates.

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 19,2010

Vagina Wins! (Kind Of)

Nearly a decade after performances were banned, the controversial Vagina Monologues will be performed at Gonzaga — but you’re not invited.

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, April 6,2011

Revenge of Prop. 4

The Community Bill of Rights is back - shorter, sleeker but still the same.

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, August 10,2011

Who Ya Gonna Call?

The county’s 911 system crashes; plus, Olympia gets more male-dominated

Jacob Jones, Daniel Walters, Joe O'Sullivan |
Tuesday, November 27,2012
Fall Arts

Arts Happenings in October

Horse Thieves, Blue Scholars, Cokie Roberts, Terrain, Need | Want, and more.

Leah Sottile, Luke Baumgarten, Jordy Byrd, Tiffany Harms, Ethan Wolcott, E.J. Iannelli, Michael Bowen, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, September 21,2011


When Sara was in West Africa with the PeaceCorps did she suggest Vitamin A supplements to African parents for their children, knowing that it can improve survival rates by 80% as compared to the reduced survival rate provided by Measles Vaccine? Did she also know that Aaby et al found that measles infection provides, in African children, a survival rate for the child above that of the non-measles infected child, therefore by supplementing Vitamin A foods/supplements (eg cod liver oil) a child had less probability of developing measles (which could be called a Vitamin A deficiency disease) and any measles caught would be more manageable and confer a survival advantage over children who never caught measles? Jun 10, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

But the vaccine improves your chances of not getting measeles in the first place. It´s always better to prevent getting ill if possible than to treat the illness. Jun 13, 2011

 

This article is full of obvious biases, inaccuracies, and implied unproven causality.
1) According to CDC records there were 140 reported cases of measles in 2008. The last time I checked, three years is not over a decade.

2) Even states with no opt out for vaccinations have reported cases of measles this year.

3) Within your own report there are at least 12 cases of measles in the vaccinated population and that amount alone easily exceeds the CDC reported ineffective rate of 1% by a factor of 10.

4) Due to modern medicine, the probability of an adverse reaction to the MMR vaccine is geometrically larger than the probability of dying from complications from measles.
Jun 10, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

I´d like to respond to a couple of your points, if I may -

1) The numbers cited in this article refer to the cases thus far this year, only: 118. This number is higher than any other year´s (similar time period) since 1996, according to the CDC:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6020a7.htm?s_cid=mm6020a7_w

2) What states? As far as I have found, Mississippi and West Virginia are the only states with ONLY a medical exemption (i.e. they have no religious exemption). Both have no reported cases this year, and Mississippi claims (at their st. department website) that they haven´t had any confirmed case since 1992.

3) These numbers don´t make sense. In a population of 100,000, with a 1% vaccine failure rate, there will be 1,000 individuals who are at risk (among those vaccinated). It´s no shock then that ~12 of the 118 would be vaccinated.

4) I don´t know why you´re comparing adverse reactions with death. It seems like apples and oranges to me.

I know vaccination is an emotional topic - how could it not be? All of us want our kids to be happy and healthy and keep them from harm. I urge everyone to do their research, and to have a healthy amount of criticism for ANY source. It´s hard to know who to trust and there are a lot of emotional arguments out there. I researched this and came up with my own opinion, obviously. I know that correlation is not causation, but looking at the numbers did a lot for me:
http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p4037.pdf Jun 13, 2011

 

I would be curious to know how many of the parents who opted out of "one or more" vaccinations were only declining the chickenpox one. It does seem that more and more immunizations are thrust onto our society as being important or required. Some common childhood illnesses, like chicken pox, don´t have dire consequences when contracted.

I think part of the reason that people hesitate to vaccinate to prevent this type of illness is that there is evidence that vaccination with foreign proteins and the various adjuvants causes adverse effects on the body-- it is not just a matter of preventing an illness, but a question of what is better for a person´s overall health.

Jun 14, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

WA exceeds the national averages for vaccination rates for school required vaccines.

96% coverage of the required vaccines for 6th graders
http://www.doh.wa.gov/cfh/immunize/documents/6gradecov09-10.pdf
(DPT looks low because a booster is required at age 11 and the report is filed at the beginning of the year. )

Kindergartners start school with over 95% MMR, and over 90% of the other required shots.
http://www.doh.wa.gov/cfh/immunize/documents/statekindercov09-10.pdf

You can´t have 95 % vaccination rates and a 6.2% exemption rate- that adds up to more than 100%!

The WA exemption rate appears artificially high for 2 primary reasons:

1. "Paperwork" exemptions. Fully 1/3 or more of the exemptions (2% of the 6%) are vaccinating families who simply don´t have their documentation in order at the time of school enrollment. Sympathetic school staff are incorrectly providing exemption forms to permit the children to attend school, when they should be using a "non-compliance" form. WA Health Secretary Mary Selecky recently described this phenomenon on OPB Talk Out Loud radio program.
http://www.opb.org/thinkoutloud/shows/immunization-boosters/
That means the true vaccination rates are even higher than documented, when you factor in the paperwork exemptors.

2. Chicken Pox- Another 1/3 of the exemption rate (2%) is due to making Chicken Pox a mandatory vaccine. Many parents do not consider Chicken Pox as important as the traditional vaccines. An exemption is needed to delay or opt out of any single dose. Therefore a WA child who is fully current on all of the regular shots still needs an exemption to delay or opt out of the Chicken Pox vaccine. Informed parents are doing the Chicken Pox separate from other vaccines as the CDC notes that getting the Chicken Pox (Varicella) vaccine in the same visit with the MMR increases the normal MMR seizure rate from 1/3500 to 1/2500, and if you use the MMRV combo the seizure rate jumps again to 1/1250. What is unscientific about cutting your childs´ seizure risk by 70% if you can do it by delaying or skipping a vaccine for a disease that was once considered a routine childhood illness?
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmrv/vacopt-faqs-parent.htm

When you back out the paperwork exemptions and the Chicken Pox exemptions you get the same national average, a statistically insignificant 2% or so of people who have reasonable medical, religious, philosophical, or personal objections.

All vaccination public health objectives are exceeded with the 95% rates currently achieved. Any epidemic risk tipping point is long past at 95%. If 95% isn´t enough to suppress epidemics then the issue isn´t vaccine coverage it is vaccine efficacy.

Public Health Canada clearly states that 1/100,000 doses in all vaccine campaigns result in a serious adverse event (SAE), defined as a Hospitalization, Disability, or Death. This is why the safety question will never go away. While that may be a low individual risk rate, (although certainly more dangerous that Chicken Pox or mumps), the sheer volume of vaccines is overwhelming achievable safety factors. There are 900,000 children in WA public schools. That means each dose of vaccine in the schedule (50 or -) is causing 9 SAE´s. This is the population pool of "true exemptors". There have been a scientific statistically inevitable 2 to 3 thousand legitimate SAE´s in WA over the last 20 years. The 18,000 or so "true exemptors" represent the family members and friends, and others who have first hand knowledge of these injuries.
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/alert-alerte/h1n1/faq/faq_rg_h1n1-fvv-eng.php
Jun 14, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

Vaccine proponents assume that those of who don´t vaccinate are "misinformed" or doing it for "convenience" or "can´t find the records". Everyone I know that doesn´t vaccinate are probably more researched and informed than some that just follow the AMA rules.
The vaccine issue IS emotional, who doesn´t want to protect our precious children? The decision should not be emotional but factual. For starters checkout the individual ingredients in vaccines; mercury(thimerosol), aluminum, formaldehyde, animal DNA, latex. Or what about the continuing increase in autism? If there is an increase in parents opting out of vaccines it is because they are more informed, probably because of the internet. If the proponents think the vaccines are so wonderful why worry about few that don´t vaccinate, they are covered!
Most importantly it should be the exclusive decision of the parents. This is more of a parental rights issue of which the state continues to chip away at.

Jun 14, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close