Wednesday, June 15, 2011

More Than A Game

What would Clarence Darrow say about the NFL and NBA disputes?

Ted S. McGregor Jr.

With two new biographies just out, Clarence Darrow is back in the public eye — and right on time, as America is simmering in that age-old cauldron of labor versus capital. Although best known for his work in the Scopes trial, most of his more than 2,000 cases were spent defending workers’ rights.

And during the Gilded Age, a century ago, workers needed help — factory doors were often locked during work hours, there were no child-labor laws, and strikes were routinely squashed by National Guard units or private detectives hired by owners. Darrow, the first celebrity lawyer, used the press to make sure that many of his cases were covered nationally, leading to outrage over practices that inspired sweeping labor reforms.

According to his biographers, Darrow always saw the law as a fight between the rich and the poor. So what would he make of a labor struggle between the super-rich and the obscenely rich? That’s exactly what America is in for, as our wildly popular professional sports leagues, the NBA and NFL, are in the early stages of major disputes between team owners and players. The unemployment bug could be hitting your favorite professional athlete soon. Entire seasons may be lost.

At stake is money, of course — billions and billions of dollars. Owners in both leagues want players to take a pay cut, and there is evidence that business has been tough (although unlike the NBA, the NFL has yet to open its books to players). For America, is it a case study in labor relations through a fun-house mirror? Or are there elements of this fight that can resonate across society? Like middle-class workers, the players see that the economy is retracting, and they understand they will need to make sacrifices. And also like workers who see corporate profits at all-time highs (and, no, they’re still not hiring), the players have to wonder how much of the owners’ sob stories are a bluff.

As two of the strongest unions anywhere, the NBA and NFL players don’t need a Clarence Darrow. They’ll be fine. But as we watch it all unfold, we all could learn something about how we, as a nation, should share sacrifice in these tough times — and how we should share success.

Darrow’s signature move was to turn his defense of one downtrodden individual into a prosecution of capitalism’s excesses. In many cases, America agreed with Darrow and judged big business to be at fault, leading Congress to fine tune the system. This summer’s fight may help reveal whether we have a system that needs adjusting again.

Ted S. McGregor Jr. is the Editor and Publisher of The Inlander.

Also in Commentary

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Cougar by the Tail

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Power to the People

Will Spokane step up and grab its own future?

Thomas Alan Linzey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By Ted S. McGregor Jr.

Disaster Politics

The snow is a perfect metaphor for how our state deals with crises

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, December 29,2010

Time To Decide

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Thursday, May 29,2003
Common Ground

The 3-S Test

Sometime around the time Barack Obama won the White House...

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, June 2,2010


 
 
Close
Close
Close