Partisan creep is moving in on non-partisan territory and threatens to wreak havoc on our good government. I am angry and very sad for Coeur d’Alene.
In the just-concluded, by-law-nonpartisan city elections in Kootenai County, the Reagan Republicans won all the races they invested time and dollars in. Shamelessly, they pulled out all the stops on their party machine and played all the negative cards in their hands.
Is there anything wrong with their game plan to insert partisan politics into local nonpartisan elections, practically, politically and/or ethically? I say a loud “yes” to all of the above. It’s not just a question of changing the rules in the middle of the game (although that rankles, too). There are longstanding reasons why some elected positions are historically and appropriately nonpartisan.
The election of judges, for instance, has in recent years
been tainted by partisanship. Our judicial system rises or falls on the
stature of the judges we hire to uphold the rules of law that we claim
we live by. Judges should be chosen based on their qualifications, which
includes their experience, intelligence, integrity and work ethic.
Neither party, Republican or Democrat, has a hold on any of these
qualities. Partisanship should play no part in the selection of judges.
City elections have always been nonpartisan for many of the same reasons. They provide an opportunity for citizens to come together to choose the individuals they believe are most qualified and most responsible to lead a city into the future. Heads unfuzzied by partisan pressures have a better chance of making intelligent choices.
Genuine nonpartisanship turns everyone into an independent voter, free from partisan bias and only concerned about who can do the best job. One-third of Idaho voters claim no party allegiance and have no patience with partisan politics.
In the case of our recently concluded city election in Coeur d’Alene, the Reagan Republicans had been whipped into a high fury about the proposal to upgrade the downtown city property at McEuen Field. The proposal, put together by a team of citizens working through the previous summer, would transform the city parking lot by the lake into a green and people-friendly space filled with options for residents and visitors to enjoy.
A faction of Reagan Republicans took up opposing the plan to create McEuen Park, criticizing almost every aspect of the citizen’s committee work. Their battle cry has been a demand for a public vote in a veiled attempt to sidetrack development of the park. I’ve written of my excitement about the emerging McEuen Park, perhaps tediously. I long for the day when that exquisite lakeside property, now covered with asphalt, is part of a park, not a parking lot.
Former state representative George Sayler ran for the open City Council seat. George has all the qualities you would want in an elected official. Years of teaching political science in Coeur d’Alene High School, years of service in the Idaho House of Representatives. Intelligent, conscientious, a known and respected public servant. When asked at a meeting of the Reagan Republicans who he supported for president, his very appropriate response was, “What connection does that have with the city election?”
Nevertheless, Sayler said he had voted for Obama and would vote for him again. In the last days of the campaign, this exchange came to voters in the form of a postcard, with an unattractive picture of Sayler, side by side with an unappealing (and perhaps darkened) photo of President Barack Obama.
When the votes came in, Sayler was trounced by a wide margin by Books for Dummies author Dan Gookin.
Also losing to the Reagan Republican landslide was incumbent John Bruning, who chaired the Coeur d’Alene Planning Commission for decades. As president of the Coeur d’Alene Board of St. Vincent DePaul, Bruning has been responsible for partnering the city with St. Vinnie’s to create the HELP office. The former city library has been turned into a one-stop shop for needy or homeless people seeking help in finding shelter, food or a job. Bruning has also been charged with chairing the committee to save the trees on the North Idaho College dike from the Army Corps of Engineers’ plan to cut them down.
Bruning lost his re-election bid to Steve Adams, an
insurance salesman who has, so far, said nothing positive about the city
whose future he will help plot as a member of the City Council.
So I’m a bad loser. But I find the mountain of misinformation circulated about the City of Coeur d’Alene to be very offensive and downright mean. The mayor, City Council and staff are doing an amazing job of turning Coeur d’Alene into a beautiful, vibrant, environmentally green, art-loving city.
Congress is showing us how extreme partisanship leads to extreme gridlock. Let’s not accentuate the negative, or copy-cat Congress. Partisanship has its place in nominating candidates and developing policy. Nonpartisan races leave the voters free to vote for the candidate, not the party.
Let's cut the partisan creep.
Mary Lou Reed lives in Coeur d’Alene. Her column appears here once a month.

So the new excuse and accusation is that the Coeurd´Alene City Council election outcome is a result of party politics. NONSENSE. Mr. Edinger´s huge victory is clear proof of something dramatically different. Mr. Edinger is a former mayor and is the current president of our City Council. He recently fell ill and shared that during his recovery he read all of the community comments regarding the proposed McEuen Field plan. I suspect he experienced and enlightened "epiphany".
Mr. Edinger asked for a simple dialogue and discussion with his current council mates regarding the possibility of a public advisory vote. He was shunned, rudly disrespected and ignored. All of this took place in full view of the public and VOTERS.
A bully attitude has reigned unchecked at City Hall. My own experience there has led me to believe that they are accustomed to getting away with that negative stance. But this time....no dice!!
This is the same City Council Group that allowed a McEuen Plan with Tubbs Hill included. Thank Mr. Edinger again for speaking up and removing Tubbs Hill from that wackadoodle plan.
I have a suggestion for the entire City council, current and future. Please bundle up and sit on the bench at the entrance to Tubbs Hill by the moose statue. Open your eyes and ears and look north.
Mayor Bloem explained to the polite crowd at the Coeurd´Alene Lakefront Property Owners summer meeting that a multi million parking garage will be necessary to accommodate the future development Along Front Avenue.
Now, do you hear the gentle waves on the shoreline? Children playing, Birds singing and the baseball hit the bat? Do you smell fresh pine and rain?
All previous studies and plans show that the increased parking should be north of Sherman. Lake City Development Company, spending all tax dollars, has already purchased and owns land for this exact purpose. Many additional properties are currently available for bargain prices. I have given the city information on some of these properties. I think we want a PARK...not a PARKING LOT.
Sorry future developers, you will have to figure out parking when you build your high-rises along Front Street.
My distaste for the current McEuen plan stems from my belief that it does not honor and revere the location. Tubbs hill is a special Public Park. I walked the field with an architect who explained the current plan to me in detail. He suggests that the city get a second, independent opinion and the council be very careful that they have a crystal clear understanding of the specifics of the plan. Parking garages....especially this one...are very hard to "undo".
McEuen could mirror the natural aspect of Tubbs Hill, much like the previous proposed plans. The previous plans were a collaboration between city government and citizens well aware of the downtown business flow. The City Council approved the previous plans and no cry for a public vote was voiced. Why did nothing happen? What stopped the implementation of the previous plans. These were good, practical, affordable plans.
If we continue to allow the current council to bully the public, I forsee citizens chained to the boat launch, which 80 percent of the public wish to remain in place (see survey found at www.savecda.org and other surveys).
A compromise plan is needed and the previous McEuen plans fit the description well.
With Riverstone bankrupt, 4th Street messed up and obvious competing needs. certainly the Lake City Development Co. will not fund another turkey. (Happy Holiday, friends).
Let´s get going on an improved McEuen. Dust off the previous plans...and we could have the neatest boat launch in Idaho, a signature ball field/concert venue. A lighted trail along the base of Tubbs Hill with benches and a surface to roll wheelchairs would be great. And a state of the art kids play area.
I call that the highest and best use for the most people, equal or better to what we have and progressive thinking. Nov 25, 2011 | Reply to this comment
The citizens of Coeur d´Alene voted for a change and to stop the ultra-expensive park remodel and perhaps change it into a more reasonable park enhancement; one that matches the natural setting of Tubbs Hill and the values and needs of the majority of the people who live in the area and not one that will glorify wealth and only serve seasonal tourists who visit the Resort.
What kind of city park plan would take out the best wind protected boat launch in Northern Idaho? We actually need more boat launches, not less. Your support to replace the 3rd Street Boat Launch with a highly inferior location demonstrates your interest in personal gain and disregard for the people of Coeur d’Alene.
A parking lot should be on an empty lot downtown away from the beautiful view shed of the lake. Water features... when we have one of the most beautiful lakes in the world to look at? Your description of a committee of citizens who planned this project; what a joke, its the LCDC. Who are you kidding.? No ordinary, common citizen or boat owner serves on this committee. The LCDC is our city’s shadow government made up of developers and builders (and their friends), who make recommendations to the City Council so that the council members need not stick their own necks out in making a decision.
So Mary Lou Reed I suggest you take a walk on Tubbs Hill once more and try and remember why you moved here in the first place. I guarantee it was not for high rises and parking lots that will block your view of the lake.
This response is from someone who is far from a Republican and in fact I am a life long Democrat who thinks you appear to be nothing more than a sore loser.
An City of Coeur d´Alene Resident (over 30 yrs),
sckIncaid
Jan 15, 2012 | Reply to this comment