Jeremy Hansen is in tears. Moments before, the chef-owner of Santé — a popular downtown Spokane French restaurant and charcuterie — sat rigid at the front of his restaurant, arms crossed across the chest of his starched-white chef’s jacket. He looked worried.
Hansen — alongside a beef farmer, a culinary instructor and a farmers market manager — was sitting on a panel at a town hall-style meeting to discuss ethical eating practices.
After each panelist gave his or her opening remarks, it was Hansen’s turn. As he explained the philosophy behind his restaurant — to have relationships with farmers, to understand the lives of the animals that will one day be on plates here, to never waste a bone or stem — Hansen started choking up.
“It’s hard for me to talk about sometimes because … it means a lot to me,” he says.
Over the past few weeks, Hansen found himself in the hot seat of an online debate over the ethics of the food Santé serves. Arguments largely focused on the appearance of foie gras and rabbit on the restaurant’s menu.
Hansen says online comments even escalated to death threats. And so he organized last week’s forum to mediate the situation in person.
Hansen says the flap started after an article in Spokane Coeur d’Alene Living discussed a rabbit killed at Santé for a class on butchering the animal. “It was a gem of a PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) story as the bunny went limp under the female author’s avocado green Birkenstock,” the article read.
Hansen says that’s not exactly what happened. “There was a killing of a rabbit, but it wasn’t a slaying.”
The Rabbit
Since opening four years ago, Hansen has been vocal about Santé’s practice of whole-beast cooking. Unlike most chefs, Hansen purchases whole animals — head, feet and all — and prides himself on using every bit of the animal in his dishes.
So, when Novella Carpenter, author of Farm City: The Education of an Urban Farmer, stopped in Spokane, it was a natural fit to host a class on cooking rabbit at Hansen’s restaurant. For the class, Hansen ordered whole rabbit carcasses for Carpenter to demonstrate butchering techniques. But on the morning of the event, the rabbits showed up already broken down into neat, ready-to-cook cuts of meat.
And that’s when Hansen decided to go pick up a rabbit from Northwest Seed and Pet — a “garden and pet store” that often has rabbits for sale. The animal was brought back to Santé where, according to Hansen, Carpenter killed it. “It was very quick, very easy,” he says. “The rabbit didn’t make a noise and all of a sudden it was on the table ready to break down.
“There was no stomping on the head of a rabbit. We didn’t gut and skin this rabbit in front of all of our customers,” he says. They didn’t eat it either. Hansen says the rabbit was donated to a friend who “saves snakes and finds places for them to live.”
But the article in Spokane Coeur d’Alene Living painted a much different picture and generated a firestorm online. The article’s author, Paul Haeder, stands by what he wrote despite the fact that he admits that he didn’t actually witness the rabbit being stomped and “the Birkenstocks — I don’t know if they were green.”
“It’s not fiction. They had to get a rabbit, they had to kill it on the spot,” Haeder says. “It was a funny story and it’s not fiction.” Hansen continues to contest the account written by Haeder (who formerly contributed to The Inlander).
Regardless, people like Tracy Martin — who runs Rabbitron, a local rabbit rescue organization — weren’t amused. She expressed her horror on Santé’s Facebook page, and encouraged other local animal advocates to speak out to Hansen.
Soon, Martin saw her passionate argument against rabbit served on Santé’s menu spin out of control and change direction.
“It turned into a foie gras conversation instead of rabbits,” she says. “I disagree with foie gras, but that’s not my cause.”
The Ducks
To get foie gras, producers have to restrain the duck, insert a 6- to 10inch tube (often called a “crammer”) down the esophagus of the animal, then scoop nearly one pound of food into the tube. The process takes up to 15 seconds, and happens three times a day.
After being on this regimen for up to four weeks, the ducks “develop what’s called fatty liver. Their liver enlarges because of the high fat diet,” says Jim Hermes, a poultry specialist at Oregon State University’s department of animal science. “When processed, it’s very soft and makes a particular product called foie gras.”
That process of force-feeding is where foie gras gets controversial, and the reason why the product is banned in Israel, Turkey and, as of this year, the state of California.
But, it’s a taste that has captivated chefs. In a recent This American Life episode, “Poultry Slam,” one chef described the allure of foie gras.
“Every chef loves foie gras,” he said. “You end up looking like a much better chef if you use foie gras.”
Santé’s Hansen says he serves it because he simply likes the taste. “I like it. I think it’s super delicious,” he says. “And I indulge in it every once in awhile.”
At the forum, Hansen is unfazed as he defends serving foie gras. “In the natural habitat, I think, for all animals or birds, they probably would just eat as much as they possibly could if they had a chance to,” he says. “That’s just in their genes to keep eating and eating and eating. … It’s a natural process either way.” Hermes says that’s flat-out wrong. “Birds eat to satisfy their energy requirement. Unlike us, we want to feel full … [but] birds, if you’re feeding them a high-calorie diet, they will tend to eat less,” he says. “That’s why under normal conditions, they don’t get obese. We’re eating for a different reason. Animals don’t do that.
“Probably, you can’t get the foie gras in the same way without the forced feeding.”
Hansen says he wouldn’t take an item off his menu because of controversy. But despite the fact that foie gras isn’t new to his menu and has been served at other Spokane restaurants, he’s rethinking its place on the Santé menu.
He prides himself on getting 70 percent of his goods from local sources. His foie gras source — one of just two in the U.S. — is located in New York.
“The thing is, you don’t have to come, and you don’t have to order it. You don’t have to eat it,” Hansen says. “I think I actually am going to take [foie gras] off for a little while anyways because I need to find — I want to find — a more natural way of making it.”
http://spokanecda.com/featured/spokanes-food-culture-%E2%80%93-locavores-gastronomiques-back-to-earth-farmers/
This story is multidimensional, far-ranging and deep enough for readers and eaters to get a larger picture of the foodie movement in Spokane as I covered it and participated in it as a writer, educator, activist, non-profit board member and radio programmer. And as an eater.
The issue is pretty tricky for ALL western eaters who do not raise their own food and cooking materials – where does it come from? The who, what, why, when and how of the matter is pretty complicated, and as a vegetarian, yes, I understand the huge impact my dietary choice has on the planet, both people and ecosystems. Industrial level organic peas are not sustainable from an ethical eating perspective. All the corn raised, 95 million acres, in USA for animal feed and ethanol, again, not ethical. That last blue fine tuna might go for $1 million, but the point is that all of our eating habits are being set into motion times 7 billion people plus billions or husbanded livestock, fish, crustaceans, and, yes, that includes bunnies.
When you eat at Sante´s or any other place, that beef, lamb, pork, chicken, quail, duck, entrails, eggs, marine flesh, anything that slithers, burrows, leaps, glides, dives, swims, flaps, scampers, runs, trots, gallops, crabs, dashes, hops, jerks, zig-zags and ends up on the plate, well, it died for you. Not mass suicide, though I know from past stories of pigs that had heart attacks when other sows were killed in large pens, or rabbits stroking out when a big dog barks at the cages. The fact is the animals died. And the death is usually done by blunt, sharp, jerking force.
Sanitize it all you want. Novella Carpenter tells her urban rabbit lovers who end up harvesting them for food to break their necks. How? Well, there is the jerk and pull method. The quick twist and yank method. Blunt force like a palm chop to the back of the head. Cradled or not cradled. This is the stuff of meat eating. Do rabbits squeal, squirm, scratch to escape human intervention in their lives? Are the people at the Ethical Eating meetings kidding themselves?
Now, there are so many ways to look at ethical eating – Food Inc.; Fresh; Future of Food; The End of the Line; Empty Oceans, Empty Oceans; King Corn; Forks Over Knives. And the thousands of small documentaries from various organizations. You could read Michele Simon´s Appetite for Profit, or Richard Manning´s Against the Grain, or Vandana Shiva´s work, or things by Alice Waters, and anything from Wendell Berry. The list is endless, to include Michael Pollan and Novella Carpenter.
But to attack the writer, to attack an opening paragraph in a feature magazine article, to skew what the point of the piece is, to not even have the sense to link the article at the Inlander, well, that to me is irresponsible.
I am a friend of Jeremy Hansen. I´ve worked with him on sustainability events and wine dinners. We talked regularly about food and ethics. To convey my piece in the Spokane Living Magazine as fabricated or fiction, well, that is insincere. I will not kiss and tell here – I was at the restaurant after the event, the rabbit butchering-dressing-cooking event. I have a curious enough disposition to ask, ask, ask. And I usually get people to talk, talk, talk. I know what was said to me by Novella and Jeremy and others there.
Really, now. Did the article I wrote encourage rabbit killing? Did I put in my vegetarian bias? Did I really misstep by making it clear that a rabbit was gotten that evening, live, and taken to the restaurant and put to death. In many places I´ve lived, cutting the neck of a goat, rabbit, pig and even cattle are all part of the culture of eating food. I think the deaths there were not self-inflicted. Do animals feel pain? Do they resist? Do they have memories? Do they do things for fun? Are they protective? Cooperative? Competitive? Do they get mad? Sad? Are they happy?
Well, there are all sorts of great works on those issues. Even just putting them in captivity, those issues are topics of our times. Ever see the Academy Award winning film, “The Cove”? It doesn´t matter, really, unless you want to consider the huge impact Homo Sapiens has had on the world, the oceans, ecosystems, on our own species. Let´s hope that Cormac McCarthy´s eaters in the book, “The Road,” don´t end up in a class on how to season that food of the day. I doubt Jeremy will be doing any of the cooking that the movie, “The Road,” explores.
Apr 18, 2012 | Reply to this comment
I love Paul Haeder by the way he is a good man with great wisdom and a talented hand for righting. The piece he wrote that started all this was brilliantly written. I am saddened to see that the rest of the article was looked over. The story (http://spokanecda.com/featured/spokanes-food-culture-–-locavores-gastronomiques-back-to-earth-farmers/ ) had a more important message then the rabbit situation.
Apr 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment