Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Members-Only Voting

Republican overreach has locked thousands of Idahoans out of the vote.

Mary Lou Reed

Idaho’s primary system has been turned into an exclusive club for Republicans only. Although Democrats and Independents together make up a majority of voters in the state, only Republicans will be voting in most contested elections.

For years and years, we in Idaho have enjoyed not only a secret ballot, but also secret party affiliation. Now, casting a ballot on primary day — Tuesday, May 15 — will give full public disclosure to each private individual’s choice of political parties.

Until now, the drill for the Idaho voter on primary election day has been to sign in at the precinct polling place and receive a perforated ballot — one side with the printed Republican candidates and one side for Democrats. In the privacy of the voting booth, the voter could then mark the ballot on the party of choice, tear the perforations, slip the marked piece of paper in the ballot box and toss the other half in the wastebasket.

Nobody knew which party you had chosen.

That cloak of privacy gave each of us a warm buzz of satisfaction. The tradition probably originated as a populist attempt to shield workers from the displeasure of their bosses.

In the early ’60s, the Idaho Legislature attempted to reform the system by requiring individuals to ask for a Republican or Democratic ballot. I remember it clearly, as my husband, Scott, was running that year for prosecuting attorney of Kootenai County on the Republican ticket. After I asked for a Democratic ballot, I heard the election judges in the background whispering, “But isn’t her husband a Republican?” Tut-tut.

I didn’t like the situation, and fortunately the rest of the state protested, too. The Legislature sheepishly reverted to the perforated ballot. The open primary prevailed.

Fast-forward to the 2011 legislative session, when Idaho’s Legislature slammed the door shut on our longstanding open-primary tradition. Republican legislators amended the code to allow a political party to require voters to declare party allegiance before they could put their hands on a ballot

Democrats in the Legislature argued against the change, pointing to the one-third of Idaho voters who consider themselves to be Independents, even though no such party officially exists in our state. Now voters will be publicly listed as one of three choices: Democrat, Republican or “unaffiliated.” (Unaffiliated sounds like extra, or unneeded, or unwanted or — worse yet — unwashed.)

Republican sponsors of the change maintained that this move was necessary to stop Democrats from crossing over to vote on the Republican ballot for the weakest candidates, and consequently giving a boost to Democratic candidates down the road in the general election.

While it’s no secret that some Idaho Democrats have regularly chosen to vote in Republican contested primary races, there is little reason to believe they have been voting for the weakest candidates. The more likely reason for choosing to vote a Republican ballot is a desire to vote for the most reasonable candidates. It’s the anti-wacko vote.

Voting for the least qualified candidate is a dangerous game of Russian roulette. That’s how the wackos slip in.

As everyone knows, Republicans far outnumber Democrats in red-state Idaho. The Democratic Party has chosen the option to open its primary to any and all voters — even Republicans. Welcoming and generous as that is, in Kootenai County all the contested races are on the Republican ballot.

All incumbent Republicans holding Kootenai County offices have challengers, as do most of the legislators. Democrats have recruited candidates for all of the legislative seats in Kootenai County. However, no Democrats have filed in any of the four races for county positions.

So in those four positions, the game will be over for Republican primary winners. They will have won and a majority of voters will be deprived of deciding who will be their elected county officials.

The independent or “unaffiliated” voters are the ones to be hurt the most from the closed primary. Independent voters are turned off by the rank partisanship in Congress and state legislatures. That independent person doesn’t particularly agree with either one of the major political parties. With no dog in the fight, the Independent may have a clearer view of the situation.

Democrats considering temporary conversion to Republicanism are going through some serious soul-searching. The list of registered Republicans will be public. Could one really hold their head high? Does one really want to endure the barrage of requests for money from every possible Republican candidate? The telephone calls? And how to explain to the children? Much less, face oneself in the mirror every morning?

But Dave Oliveria of the Spokesman-Review offered a way to vote in the Republican primary and keep your self-respect. Dave wrote recently that he plans to register Republican and then vote against all the incumbent legislators who voted for closing the primary.

Not such a bad idea.

Also in Commentary

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Cougar by the Tail

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Power to the People

Will Spokane step up and grab its own future?

Thomas Alan Linzey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By Mary Lou Reed

Stop the Luna-cy

In November, vote to let Idaho’s teachers do their jobs

Mary Lou Reed |
Tuesday, September 25,2012

Freedom Tree, R.I.P.

Downtown Coeur d’Alene’s Freedom Tree stood for (and in the way of) so much — it should never be forgotten

Mary Lou Reed |
Wednesday, March 27,2013
Commentary

Hug Those Trees

Why clear-cutting near North Idaho College is a bad idea.

Mary Lou Reed |
Wednesday, August 24,2011
Commentary

The Unartful Dodger

When anti-tax fervor extends into theft, it’s time to censure a self-serving Idaho Republican.

Mary Lou Reed |
Tuesday, November 23,2010
Commentary

Necessary Changes

You don’t need to be a constitutional scholar to vote on changes in Idaho.

Mary Lou Reed |
Wednesday, October 27,2010


An alternate solution would be to move the Idaho petition deadline for independent candidates from March to August. That way, if the Republicans nominate someone displeasing to large numbers of voters, an independent can still get in the race. We saw this work well in 2010 in states that have late deadlines for independent candidates. A moderate independent was elected Governor of Rhode Island. A moderate independent was almost elected Governor of Maine; he lost to the Republican by fewer than 10,000 votes. Lisa Murkowski won the general election on write-ins even though she had lost the Republican primary. Governor Crist of Florida ran for the US Senate as an independent and came close to winning; he came in second. Apr 26, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

I´m sooo confused. Secret ballots are good in primaries because that ensures privacy. But secret ballots are bad when voting for a labor union. Perhaps some progressive can explain this apparent inconsistency. Apr 26, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close