Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Rehab Candidate

America's fallen and it won't get up without enacting five surgical reforms.

George Nethercutt

The human rotator cuff consists of four tendons in the shoulder that allow the arm to move and the shoulder to turn without pain. When it’s torn, it’s painful as hell — crippling, even. Thousands of rotator cuff surgeries are performed each day in the United States to allow sufferers to return to normal activities, but it takes time, requires eight weeks in a sling and months of physical therapy to get better.

The United States has torn its rotator cuff. It hurts to move; surgery and rehabilitation are imperative.

The impasse in Washington, D.C., and the economic pain our country suffers can be fixed, but it will take a good surgeon and lots of therapy. The best surgeon will be a new president. The rehab can come from a new Congress and a fresh government with support and encouragement from the family of Americans who love the patient and want a return to good health. Ignoring the pain and avoiding surgery will hold America back and damage our long-term prospects for a better life.

The Obama campaign essentially says, “Give us more time,” but time’s up — we’re hurting too much. The national debt is $16 trillion and growing. Unemployment is 8.2 percent, but in too many states, it’s well over 10 percent. Class warfare won’t relieve our pain, nor will higher taxes, massive health care system overhauls or endless deficit spending. Our chief surgeon has committed malpractice. America needs a problem-solver.

Here’s some surgery and rehabilitation a new president can prescribe:

First, propose a constitutional amendment for House members to have four-year terms to coincide with a presidential term. That way, a new president can be judged every four years, along with that specific House of Representatives, based on what they have or haven’t accomplished during their period of service. A four-year term for House members will produce a maximum of good work for the nation and a minimum of fundraising. Today the ratio is about 50-50 — a year of work and a year of fundraising and campaigning for re-election. A four-year term offers a 75-25 ratio.

Second, a new president and a majority of congressional Republicans and Democrats should adopt a four-year budget plan — not the one-year process we have now — and then stick to it and be judged by it when election time rolls around. Each year, the president’s budget is released — and then dismissed by Congress. The Senate hasn’t adopted a budget, contrary to existing law, for more than four years — a disgrace by any measure. Most major countries of the world adopt long-term budget plans (China, soon to be the world’s largest economy, adopts at least five-year plans) and so should the United States. Annual budget plans haven’t worked. Congress and the president merely adopt irresponsible continuing resolutions that delay decision-making and irritate the public.

Third, the new president should invite major American companies — the job creators — to the White House to adopt a handful of specific measures to assure that American business will start hiring. President Obama can’t do that. He’s already vilified American business. His administration has ruled and regulated against business, stifling job creation, and his natural inclinations are toward those in poverty. A new president should ask business leaders, “What will it take from government to get you hiring again?” Then he and Congress should pass such measures and hold business leaders accountable for their hiring record. At the end of four years, voters should have good reason to elect, or dismiss, the president and the Congress that adopted the rehabilitation plan. Hiring incentives should lapse if growth is not forthcoming.

Fourth, a presidential challenger should meet privately and often with Hispanics, African-Americans, teachers, professionals, laborers and others who make up the rich fabric of the United States, and truly seek their advice. Make a public list of promises to those needing help, and then stick to it — and, again, be judged by it at term’s end.

Fifth, Congress should be in session all five days of the week, getting to know each other and adopting the four-year plan. Congress should be an engaged partner for American renewal, fully aware that surgery will be bold and recovery painful and slow at times.

But the patient will recover and be stronger, and will need support and encouragement during the rehab. Surgery and rehabilitation require lifestyle changes and accountability. Surgery can improve long-term health. Rehabilitation makes patients stronger. It requires discipline and effort.

Failure to try means failure to recover.

Also in Commentary

New Frontiers

While the Old West still feeds the mythology of the region, the New West commands a new paradigm

Michael Dax |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

The Sports Mafia

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By George Nethercutt

Going Dutch

With its enviable waistlines (and lifespans) Holland's two-wheel culture is something America should emulate.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, June 13,2012

Grounding Hong Kong

China is keeping Hong Kong on a short leash, testing if its policy of silencing all internal criticism is sustainable

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, April 9,2013
Commentary

Civics Lessons

Why studying American history is essential to being a good citizen

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, March 31,2010

Election Reflections

The Newt we see on the campaign trail is the same old Newt I used to work with.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, February 8,2012

The Right Ratio

In the debate over how wealthy some Americans should be, we should first consider our free-market traditions.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, March 7,2012


I like the analogy, but the question remains whether or not we the people can sue the surgeon for malpractice if the surgery and rehabilitation are ineffective in solving the problem. May 09, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

A new president? I see Mr. Nethercutt is like all the other republicans who have a short term memory.

Mitt is proposing to enact the exact same policies that the Bush administration enacted and put the country into the current mess it is in, and is even proposing he would take the country into ANOTHER war, this time with Iran.

Have you already forgot that the day Obama stepped into office we were LOSING over 750,000 jobs a month? Yes, 150,000 jobs being ADDED isn´t great, but it´s not to bad when you have one whole political party not doing anything to help the country and refusing to work with the president only so they can make him a one-term president. Also doesn´t help that the republicans have made 60 votes the new majority thus ensuring NOTHING gets passed in the senate.

Yes, the democrats have been pretty worthless the last 4 years, but at least they have tried to do something - only to be denied at every turn by the republicans. How many bills have the REPUBLICAN lead house of representatives passed (you know what that is, you spent how many years in that place, after of pushing that whole term limit lie thing that put you into office)? Let me answer that for you Mr. Nethercutt, that would be ZERO, they have passed zero jobs bills to help the country while they have been in charge. But, they have passed bills about abortion, only for those bills to go nowhere, and even had time to pass bills to name Post Offices (even though they hate the Postal Service). That sounds like it will help the country get back to work!!!

Yes, blame the current president for everything and vote in the guy touting the policies of George W. Bush, that sounds like a great idea Mr. Nethercutt. Please, stop spouting the typical republican talking points. May 09, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

well said. Nethercutt must be getting to the age where he simply forgets things that are inconvenient to his argument. let's take a look at some of the bills the GOP has filibustered or tried to block:nnhttp://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/01/03/bills-republicans-have-blocked/nnObama has been far from perfect but the Republicans (and even worse Tea Party members) that Obama has to currently deal with are a bunch of babies... hell, Boehner routinely cries like one. the GOP refuses to work with Obama on ANYTHING and then they step up to the microphone and say, "look at how bad the President is.... he isn't doing anything!". nnthe GOP fires up the public about a healthcare plan that was created after their ideals. Palin screams death panels. Nethercutt screams that you won't be able to visit the doctor you want anymore. I guess the GOP strategy is to repeatedly scream enough absurdities that the public starts to believe them. healthcare is a HUGE problem in America... this bill is far from perfect but it's WAY better than the current system. the GOP wants to eliminate this bill and let the free market take care of itself. a free market that saw premiums raise 135% over the past ten years. a free market where 62% of all bankruptcies where because of medical bills (of those 62%, 75% of those people had health insurance). a free market that denied children who had diseases. and that's just the tip of the ice berg when speaking about the problems our current system has. nndid you know that Fortune 500 companies generated a combined $824 billion in profits last year! Lockheed Martin recorded $2.6 billion in profits and offered buyout plans for 6,000 employees. GE has paid an average federal tax rate of 2.3% for the past decade while shipping 20% of it's workforce overseas. GM amassed $9 billion in profits and froze the pay of 26,000 employees. nngreed is at an all-time high and if you dare mention it, you're creating "class warfare". the gap between rich and poor is at all-time highs. salaries for CEO's have never been better while the working class salaries have flatlined. nnthe ONLY people that benefited while Bush was in office were the top 10% of income earners and they made that money while people were losing their jobs, homes and pensions. I want a president who fights for the average citizen, not one that fights for the wealthy... I mean the "job creators" which is a phrase that we now have to call the rich. has any theory been proven wrong more times than trickle down economics? nnObama isn't perfect but at least he's fighting for the average american. Romney is far from perfect and the only people he will fight for are the ones that don't need any help. Jul 13, 2012

 

sorry about the way that came out.... I had the paragraphs separated but somehow it didn't post that way. Jul 13, 2012

 

some inlander agreement it seems: http://www.inlander.com/spokane/article-18208-bush-on-steroids.html Jul 19, 2012

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close