Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Tug of War

Will gay marriage in Washington state get rolled back?

Joe O'Sullivan
Barack Obama supports gay marriage. But will Washington state uphold it in a public vote?
Barack Obama supports gay marriage. But will Washington state uphold it in a public vote?
Barack Obama supports gay marriage. But will Washington state uphold it in a public vote?
When Vice President Joe Biden earlier this month announced his support of gay marriage (“absolutely comfortable!”), the commander-in-chief soon followed.

Ever since, pundits and propagandists have been furiously debating whether President Barack Obama’s endorsement of gay-marriage rights was a genuine evolution or a political ploy to rally the liberal base.

But beneath the national political static, Washingtonians have their own struggle, as petitioners work to get a pair of proposals on the November ballot to kill the Evergreen State’s recently enacted gay-marriage law.

Gay-marriage opponents are busy gathering signatures to roll back the law passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Christine Gregoire in February. If enough signatures are gathered by the June 6 deadline, Referendum 74 would put that law to a public vote on the November general election ballot. (A separate initiative seeking to define marriage as being between a man and a woman has until July to gather of the necessary signatures.)

In total, Referendum 74 needs 120,577 valid signatures to get on the ballot, according to the Washington Secretary of State’s office. Since some signatures are found to be invalid, the office recommends going over by 25 percent, or another 30,000, signatures.

As of Tuesday morning, Preserve Marriage Washington’s website said it had gathered 105,780 signatures.

Why is Referendum 74 a significant challenge to gay marriage? Because so far, public votes in other states have always shot down marriage equality.

Rich Viel, a pastor at Trinity Baptist Church in north Spokane, has been hard at work, gathering nearly 3,000 signatures for Referendum 74. His church is one of four locations spearheading the signature gathering in the Spokane area on behalf of Preserve Marriage Washington.

“We don’t believe that is hate speech,” says Viel, 56. “We believe that is what God tells us.”

While some younger members of his congregation support marriage equality, Viel says he’s evolved toward a more strict interpretation of the Bible. The Whitworth University graduate says his opposition to gay marriage comes down to passages in Genesis and Romans I that he says make gay relations a sin.

Gay marriage is currently legal in Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire, New York, Massachusetts and Vermont, as well as Washington, D.C. Legislators in Maryland this year also approved gay marriage, and that law is also facing efforts to roll it back. More than 30 states have voted to make gay marriage illegal. North Carolina was the most recent, approving a ban earlier this month by a 20 percent popular-vote margin.

There have been efforts to educate people on Referendum 74 in hopes that they don’t sign the petitions, according to Shar Lichty, an organizer with Peace and Justice Action League of Spokane. But groups are already looking ahead to make sure that if the referendum makes the ballot, the public will go ahead and approve gay marriage.

“What the world needs more of, to be corny, is more love,” says Lichty, who identifies as GLBT.

In April, Lichty helped organize a march of marriage-equality supporters through Spokane to City Hall for a City Council debate on a local marriage-equality resolution. After several hours of testimony, the council tabled the resolution without approving or formally denying it.

Lichty isn’t worried about Referendum 74 getting on the ballot. She sees it as an opportunity.

“We’ll make history in Washington,” she says, “with Washington being the first state to [publicly] approve marriage equality.”

Also in News

No Longer Special

At Rogers High School, special education kids increasingly are being placed in regular classes

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, June 19,2013

Droning On

Of police drones, settlements and zoning

Heidi Groover, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, June 19,2013

INTERVIEW | Bart Mihailovich

The Spokane Riverkeeper on the effect of coal trains

Megan Peterson |
Wednesday, June 19,2013

Man vs. Wolf

Loved and hated, the gray wolf finds itself a target for hunters as advocates call for continued protection

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, June 19,2013

Calculating Crimes

Spokane police say new efforts have slowed the rise in property crime rates, which have increased since 1985 despite national trends

Jacob Jones, Lisa Waananen |
Wednesday, June 12,2013

Also By Joe O'Sullivan

'Life Has Value'

A possible tax for Spokane Police; plus, efforts to end the death penalty

Joe O'Sullivan, Jacob Jones, Daniel Walters |
Tuesday, January 29,2013

Out of Sight

Spokane City Council’s war on the poor; plus, more Matt Shea drama

Daniel Walters, Heidi Groover, Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, August 22,2012

Up for Vote

The Spokane City Council’s free-for-all on charter amendments

Joe O'Sullivan |
Tuesday, December 18,2012

Time Out

Sitting downtown with Lisa Brown

Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, November 7,2012

Redemption Song

Why there’s reason to think Jeramie Davis may be innocent

Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, July 25,2012


Once again the intolerant religious right are out in force trying to push their religious agenda´s on everyone.

Not everyone believes in your book of fairy-tails and bedtime stories, and you hate it when non-religious people try and tell you what to believe, yet you seem to have no problem forcing your religious views on everyone else.

Also nice to see churches and religious groups proving to all how they are the most intolerant and hateful people around. May 28, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

To spokanecougar:

I think your own prejudices are blinding you....and is it okay for you to go on the attack against those who disagree with you.....but not okay for them to do the same? Just a tad hypocritical, don´t you think?

That said, if you reread the article you should note that every state so far, where the vote has gone to the people, gay marriage has been denied. That´s the honest way to reach a decision: by the majority of the people. A State legislature forcing their agenda down the voters throats isn´t how this country is supposed to do things! You may not like the outcome when the people decide, but that´s how our country is supposed to work.....government by the people, of the people and for the people, not TO the people.
There´ve been a lot of decisions made by voters from the West side of this State that I strongly oppose; especially King County and it´s extreme liberal ideologies, but I have to live with it, and using insulting and judgmental attacks on them doesn´t do me any good. The majority rules. That´s how it´s supposed to be. May 28, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

@davidbraynnActually, the legislature enacting laws for the people of their districts, and the state, is exactly what this country is suppose to be about.nnAllowing the majority to overrule equal rights has never been in anybody's best interest and that's NOT how it's suppose to be.nnEqual protection under the law. Not equal protection as long as the majority agrees. Jun 06, 2012

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close