Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Friends in High Places

Local influencers support legalizing pot

Joe O'Sullivan
Ben Stuckart says of pot: “By legalizing it, we can regulate it.”
Ben Stuckart says of pot: “By legalizing it, we can regulate it.”
Ben Stuckart says of pot: “By legalizing it, we can regulate it.”
On his first ride-along with police officers, Ben Stuckart says he learned a lesson about marijuana laws.

It was in September, before his election as Spokane City Council president, and he and an officer responded to a pair of marijuana calls. But in the “zero-sum” game of policing, Stuckart says the officers could have instead been responding to priority calls.

“If we’re spending resources on enforcement of marijuana laws, then we’re not spending it on [catching] people breaking into cars,” Stuckart says. “By legalizing it, we can regulate it very similarly to how alcohol and cigarettes are regulated.”

New Approach, a group pushing a ballot measure to legalize and regulate marijuana, announced this week it had Stuckart’s endorsement, along with those of Sen. Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, and New Hope Baptist Church Rev. Happy Watkins.

Known as I-502, the ballot measure would allow Washingtonians 21 and up to possess up to an ounce of weed, according to New Approach. The measure, if approved by voters this fall, would also allow businesses to get licenses to grow and sell marijuana. It would also set up a DUI threshold for intoxicated tokers, similar to blood alcohol levels. And if I-502 passes, the state would become an official drug dealer, making rules on quality control and any public health issues before doling out grower licenses.

But Rep. Kevin Parker, R-Spokane, pointed out I-502’s obvious flaw. “The challenge is that it contradicts federal law,” Parker says.

He adds that in testimony before the Legislature, county sheriffs have said that the counties do not have the resources to police the proposed marijuana regulations.

“Every sheriff that has testified in front of [the Ways and Means committee] has been against this,” Parker says. “There will have to be a discussion at the federal level.”

Also in News

Calling for Help

A frantic 911 call lands Christopher Parker instead of a hospital, and leads to his death

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Let 'Em Vote

Spokane City Council won’t sue to keep initiatives off of the fall ballot; plus, a new UW-WSU rivalry

Heidi Groover, Deanna Pan, Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Reefer Rules

Washington state takes a first pass at marijuana market regulations

Heidi Groover, Lisa Waananen |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Disorderly Conduct

Three Spokane law enforcement officers are placed on leave over misconduct investigations

Jacob Jones |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Uneven Cuts

Most elements of health care were shielded from the sequester but not the Indian Health Service

Daniel Walters |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

Also By Joe O'Sullivan

Come and Get It

There is $32 million of unclaimed property in Spokane County. Is any of it yours?

Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, February 22,2012

The City Sell-Off

Spokane is trying to unload 20 properties

Joe O'Sullivan |
Tuesday, September 4,2012

Disappearing Act

After going on hiatus last year, Spokane Opera struggles to get its groove back

Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, November 30,2011

A Rising Crimson Tide?

Can Democrats turn the Idaho panhandle purple?

Joe O'Sullivan |
Wednesday, October 10,2012

Put to a Vote

Libraries, police and taxes: A closer look at the Feb. 12 election

Joe O'Sullivan |
Tuesday, January 22,2013


Thank you for the article! In response to the statement by Rep. Parker, "There will have to be a discussion at the federal level.” It is obviously the case that Medical marijuana also contradicts federal law, yet seventeen states - and even Washington, D.C. - have been passing such laws since 1996. Clearly, sensible marijuana reform is an issue where the states are going to have to lead. As states continue to push for legalization it will force "the discussion at the federal level," I urge you, a state representative, to pay attention to your local constituency and to join your local colleagues in exhibiting true leadership. Yes on I-502.

Kevin Oliver, Executive Director, Washington NORML
National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws

Jul 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

Rep. Parker:

Medical marijuana also contradicts federal law, yet seventeen states - and even Washington, D.C. - have been passing such laws since 1996. Clearly, sensible marijuana reform is an issue where the states are going to have to lead. I urge you, a state representative, to join your local colleagues in exhibiting true leadership. Yes on I-502.

Thanks,

Michelle
Spokane Jul 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

There is also a fundamental issue here. Are we really going to say that as adults in this country, we are so far-gone in our cognitive rationale that we forgo our personal responsibility, and actually need the daily choices of what we do/do not ingest to be delegated to us by and extrinsic rule? That is what we are saying, not to mention this rule that was willing accepted generations ago was only through a barrage of misinformation and campaign propaganda. We have had time to delineate the facts.nnThe medical community has numerous and robust clinical data showing clearly the health benefits (as well as the risks) associated with marijuana usage. This has been blatantly ignored by the zealous media-frenzied cries for the War on Drugs.nnYet deaths in this country via pharmaceutical prescription drugs are at an all-time high, such that it's a topic of major concern in the heath community - as it should be.nnCan we please focus our attention to violent offenders and restore to productive, tax-paying, Constitutional-loving, American adults their natural born right to govern their own bodies, and follow (or ignore) the advice of our medical professionals!nnnn nnnn Jul 19, 2012

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close