Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Country Without a Cause

The “dullest campaign ever” needs a dose of big, bold ideas

George Nethercutt
“It used to be that we expected our political leaders to give us great causes. Now we expect them to make our life easier.” So noted Pittsburgh author and pastor Craig Barnes recently.

With approval ratings at historic lows for Congress and below 50 percent for both presidential candidates, many Americans are rightly frustrated with national leaders bogged down in trivial political fights. They’re looking for leaders who will envision for us great causes that will enhance the United States — and the world. Expecting them only to make our life easier is hollow patriotism.

New York Times columnist David Brooks recently published an article entitled, “The Follower Problem.” He cited the nagging cultural attitude that defines our most recently constructed national monuments in Washington, D.C., as “memorials that expose a modern inability to describe and proclaim an authority that is just.” He asserts that the Franklin Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr. and proposed Dwight D. Eisenhower monuments fail to depict these strong leaders as people of authority. His more recent column laments the state of today’s presidential campaign, calling it the “Dullest Campaign Ever,” citing its critical importance absent any critical exaltation.

A 2010 USA Today/Gallup poll found 74 percent of Americans declaring themselves “extremely” or “very patriotic.” More than 4 million people annually visit our national monuments in Washington, D.C., the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island. When millions of Americans visit our national monuments each year, paying tribute to historical national leaders, and 74 percent consider themselves patriotic, it’s clear there’s a yearning for inspiration from our political class. The maddening lack of substance that characterizes this year’s presidential campaign is a colossal civic disappointment.

Regardless, Americans should possess high expectations of our current national leaders. Low poll numbers are usually symptomatic of weak leaders and reflect modern culture. When national leaders are bogged down in process and focused more on re-election than rededication to problem-solving, the public loses faith. We’ve seen shaken faith in our leaders every two years since 2006. A public unhappy with its leaders and yearning for change every election signals trouble for representative government. It should also signal to elected officials and those seeking office that voters want leaders, especially presidential candidates who will exercise the authority of their office to address and serve great causes needing attention.

With billions of petrodollars leaving the U.S. each day, leaders could focus on the great cause of domestic energy production. With European nations faltering economically, leaders could focus on making the U.S. an example of financial stability for the world by adopting policies that combine economic growth with fiscal austerity. With only 35 percent of Americans able to name the three federal branches of government and students failing history, one would think leaders would make civic learning a national cause. With our staggering federal debt, many Americans would support a surtax for all taxpayers dedicated specifically to debt reduction rather than taxing the wealthy to feed excessive and wasteful government spending.

Patriotism grows when citizens believe in their country and its leaders — and when leaders revere the nation’s best interests, not first their own self-interests. Eisenhower, Roosevelt and King all had a sense of mission for our country and its culture. They emerged when moments in history called them — Eisenhower leading America through a world war to victory, Roosevelt leading us through a great economic depression and King eloquently setting an example of nonviolence to change social attitudes.

Americans will follow leaders who exhibit sensible self-sacrifice for the common good, who avoid being driven merely by personal advancement or party politics and who give voters reason for allegiance to the authority they wield and respect for policy ideas worthy of the office and public trust they hold. They should at least tell voters where they want to take the country. Any Member of Congress who doesn’t stand for some great cause shouldn’t have the job.

Let us expect inspiring visions from our national leaders — that they will lead America in an authoritative and just way through the problems that dog our modern, complicated and changing society. Elections remind us that America has supported courageous leaders for more than two centuries to the benefit of our free society. We should encourage today’s leaders to recall our nation’s roots and rise to the stature of what Americans have historically expected of them — to be resources for achieving great causes.

Their rightful legacy will be a lasting American nation. ⁞

Also in Commentary

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Cougar by the Tail

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Power to the People

Will Spokane step up and grab its own future?

Thomas Alan Linzey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By George Nethercutt

Identity Crisis

We must change the way world thinks about the United States.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, November 9,2011

A New Red Menace

National debt is proving to be a formidable adversary.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, March 9,2011

Familiar Ground

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, April 13,2011
Commentary

New Year, New Hope

My resolutions for the 2011 political season.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, January 12,2011
Commentary

Anger is Not a Policy

Democrats and Republicans alike should take heed of what voter anger has wrought in the past.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, October 13,2010


When a former Congressman shares these words of warning with us, it is a statement we should all sit up and pay attention to. He has it right - Americans are increasingly frustrated by the useless partisan politics that continue to divide our leadership and prevent any progress or attempts at problem solving.

It´s time for our elected leaders to step up to the plate and take on the causes of this country. It´s time for a "rededication to problem-solving" and putting the country first, as Mr. Nethercutt calls for. That is the only way we will get anything done and solve our collective problems.

Tom Foley and George Nethercutt set an example of the responsibility leaders hold to the people they represent when they debated nine times in 1994. I hope this election my opponent and I can reaffirm this duty by giving every county a debate they expect and deserve, and I have asked my opponent to do so. Aug 08, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

"Americans should possess high expectations of our current national leaders. Patriotism grows when citizens believe in their country and its leaders — and when leaders revere the nation’s best interests, not first their own self-interests. Let us expect inspiring visions from our national leaders — that they will lead America in an authoritative and just way through the problems that dog our modern, complicated and changing society."

This would be a great closing for a campaign speech, and is the part of this article that made me sit up and pay attention -- almost as much as a statement made by Congressman Nethercutt on the floor of the House some years since about Social Security. The passion and apparent concern for people shone through in one simple statement. With a lifting of one arm, and a little anger at the political gamesmanship being expressed by a colleague, he reminded me of some of the leaders I read about in Kennedy´s "Profiles in Courage". I wished he would show that passion more frequently, particularly when he ran for the Senate. I think he would have been unbeatable had he done so. Aug 20, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

"dullest campaign ever"...does anyone remember 1988? bush senior and dan quayle? dukakis and some whoever? well, i guess quayle made it a little more comical Sep 07, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close