Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Forcing a Solution

Prohibition (still) isn’t working: Vote yes on I-502

Inlander Staff

Guess who is most worried about the passage of Washington Initiative 502? Members of Mexican drug cartels, that’s who. You know, they’re the thugs behind 14 headless bodies burned in cars in northern Mexico, a gun battle that killed 11 outside a church in Guerrero and an attack on mourners at a funeral just across the river from Texas that killed eight, including a 6-year-old girl. And those are just the headlines from the past couple weeks.

“The Mexican cartels are probably the most organized, well-funded, vicious criminal organizations that we’ve ever seen,” says Chicago-based DEA agent Jack Riley, who echoes the fact that more and more law enforcement officials are losing faith in our drug policy.

The cartels are shooting each other over the billions of dollars generated by drug smuggling and sales in the United States. One of their biggest pipelines runs right through Washington state, from British Columbia, where marijuana is the cash crop, all the way to Southern California, where countless buyers along the drug highway fuel this bloody business.

This grim picture begs for a solution. Meet I-502.

Crafted right here in Washington state, with input from a wide variety of respected public policy organizations, 502 aims to end the insanity that is our drug policy. Not only would the law regulate and tax the newly legalized marijuana, but it would also take organized crime out of the equation.

If this sounds familiar, it’s because you’ve heard this story before — with the same good intentions, and the same doomed-to-failure result. Yes, we’re right where we were in the 1920s under Prohibition. Alcohol was illegal for 14 years in America, but anybody who wanted a drink could find one, and gangsters ran the whole operation. As with alcohol, even the best laid plans have done little to stop demand for marijuana. Like it or not, many of your otherwise-law-abiding fellow Americans smoke pot: It’s part of our society.

Maybe it’s the fact that we just can’t afford to keep clogging our courts and jailing low-level pot dealers, or that it’s immoral to criminalize those who seek the drug for medical relief. Whatever the reason, there’s been a host of leniency laws passing across the nation. Washington’s will be the most comprehensive and best thought out of the batch, forcing a national discussion. And here’s another selling point: Independent analysis shows Washington could benefit from marijuana taxes (as we do with tobacco) to the tune of $2 billion over the next five years. We could use that money right now.

Some argue that since marijuana is illegal in the eyes of the feds, why try? Well, real change often has no other path than through the states. And when the feds pulled the rug out from under Washington’s citizen-approved, working-just-fine medical marijuana system over the past year, it begged for a rebuttal.

If 502 passes, would the Department of Justice, whether under Obama or Romney, really start messing with state’s rights over a policy that is failing so abjectly? Or would Congress take up the issue and grant states an opt-out clause on enforcing federal marijuana laws? Either way, 502 will redefine the debate.

A word about kids and drugs, a key consideration for any voter: As public health policy, would I-502 make marijuana more available to our children? Common sense says no. Marijuana would be controlled the way we control alcohol; it’s not a perfect system, but it’s a lot better than enabling a market to flourish in which citizens (kids especially) must interact with who-knows-how-dangerous an illegal dealer. As with alcohol, it’s still up to parents to prepare their kids to deal with the dangers of a drug like marijuana.

By clinging to a policy just like the one America watched fail for 14 years, we are all part of the problem. The black market we seem to defend fuels the carnage created by the Mexican drug cartels and their foot soldiers. I-502 is our chance to clean up this mess. 

Also in Commentary

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Cougar by the Tail

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Power to the People

Will Spokane step up and grab its own future?

Thomas Alan Linzey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By Inlander Staff

Nightlife

Inlander Staff |
Wednesday, October 26,2005

Nightlife

Inlander Staff |
Thursday, April 1,2004

Sound Advice

Inlander Staff |
Wednesday, June 27,2007

Recently Reviewed

Inlander Staff |
Thursday, December 18,2003

Recently Reviewed

Inlander Staff |
Wednesday, May 9,2007


Legalization may address related criminal problems, including Mexican gangs. But usage will increase, and there will societal costs from that. Do you want to hire a doctor, lawyer, engineer, airline pilot, long haul trucker or heavy equipment operator who smokes daily? If it´s legal, can businesses refuse to hire or fire employees who test positive for it? Are we as a society obliged to absorb the health care costs of persons who have smoked it for decades? Oct 04, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

Usage will increase. Well usage will increase anyway. Look at the historical data so far :

http://www.briancbennett.com/charts/nsduh/marijuana.htm

It has been around since the beginning of time. Humans have receptors for it for a very good reason. It turns out the human body produces endocannabinoids which play a very important role in human physiology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocannabinoid_system

We don´t consider serotonin to be a menace to society. Why demonize cannabis? Oh wait - 80 years of lies and racist propaganda! Right, the US government would never lie to it´s own citizens would it?

http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/videos/illegal-drugs-how-they-got-that-way-marihuana-history-channel/


For this no link is necessary - Google for US Patent # 6630507.

Its a 10 year old patent owned by the US government on the curative properties of cannabis.

So yes, naive ones, the feds have been lying for decades. For the last to years they have been breaking down 50,000 doors a year and this year alone have murdered over 300 dogs, mostly in drug raids. Oh wait I´m sorry - "unlicensed garden raids". Because after all, 17 states and counting legalized the personal growing of cannabis.

These are only the ones we know about (dogs murdered by cops in immoral "pot raids" - not all the murders in the graphic were committed during cannabis raids but the majority were) -

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=495041877181693&set=a.474491999236681.114728.472058059480075&type=1&theate

I know police departments who ask recruits "have you ever tried it". The ones who say np are sent home for lying. I am not making this up. It´s been that way for 20 years now.

I know a great many extremely talented electronics engineers, software engineers, technicians, and other professionals who use it.

Do I worry about stoned drivers? Nope. Never have. I do worry about drunk drivers that smoke pot though because it´s a bad combination.

Personally, I´ve been smoking weed for 30 years. As the Walter Bishop character on "Fringe" says - "a little cannabis before bedtime does wonders". I have insomnia and an overactive brain. I flushed half a bottle of prescription sleeping pills down the toilet 7 years ago when I was in a period of not smoking cannabis. Since I started up again, sleep is a lot easier. I am a legal user under Washington´s medical program and I´m grateful the law won´t change that since I can legally grow my own.

Cannabis can not physically or mentally incapacitate a person. A person habituated to it functions like anyone else in society. You can´t tell with most people.

I-502 *does* have a controversial DUI provision. There´s no defense for it either. Personally I feel it´s not needed because of what I stated above. However everything I read says that within 3 hours after use a person is legal and safe to drive so I can live with not toking and driving.

I think we´ll all be better off.

It´s time for a change and 502 has support from law enforcement and a huge section of the public. Oct 05, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

Did I mention cannabis cures cancer? And has no toxic side effects?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/19/marijuana-and-cancer_n_1898208.html

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-27/cannabis-like-drug-from-e-therapeutics-tested-in-cance

Oct 05, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

The same predictions were made when Portugal moved to decriminalize drugs in 2001. From the Business Insider article July 17, 2012 titled "Portugal Decriminalized All Drugs Eleven Years Ago And The Results Are Staggering"

"On July 1st, 2001, Portugal decriminalized every imaginable drug, from marijuana, to cocaine, to heroin. Some thought Lisbon would become a drug tourist haven, others predicted usage rates among youths to surge.

Eleven years later, it turns out they were both wrong.

Over a decade has passed since Portugal changed its philosophy from labeling drug users as criminals to labeling them as people affected by a disease. This time lapse has allowed statistics to develop and in time, has made Portugal an example to follow.

Portugal´s move to decriminalize does not mean people can carry around, use, and sell drugs free from police interference. That would be legalization. Rather, all drugs are "decriminalized," meaning drug possession, distribution, and use is still illegal. While distribution and trafficking is still a criminal offense, possession and use is moved out of criminal courts and into a special court where each offender´s unique situation is judged by legal experts, psychologists, and social workers. Treatment and further action is decided in these courts, where addicts and drug use is treated as a public health service rather than referring it to the justice system (like the U.S.), reports Fox News.

The resulting effect: a drastic reduction in addicts, with Portuguese officials and reports highlighting that this number, at 100,000 before the new policy was enacted, has been halved in the following ten years. Portugal´s drug usage rates are now among the lowest of EU member states, according to the same report.

One more outcome: a lot less sick people. Drug related diseases including STDs and overdoses have been reduced even more than usage rates, which experts believe is the result of the government offering treatment with no threat of legal ramifications to addicts.

While this policy is by no means news, the statistics and figures, which take years to develop and subsequently depict the effects of the change, seem to be worth noting. In a country like America, which may take the philosophy of criminalization a bit far (more than half of America´s federal inmates are in prison on drug convictions), other alternatives must, and to a small degree, are being discussed.

For policymakers or people simply interested in this topic, cases like Portugal are a great place to start. "

http://www.businessinsider.com/portugal-drug-policy-decriminalization-works-2012-7 Oct 07, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

To the editorial staff that wrote this endorsement: BRAVO! You painted a very grim picture, indeed.

I-502 co sponsor John McKay who is also a former US attorney, says Yakima WA is the "Federal Express" of drug distribution. David A. Nichols,retired Whatcom County Superior Court judge, illustrates WA drug distribution in his endorsement of I-502.

http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/10/06/2715458/i-502-takes-customers-away-from.html#storylink=cpy Oct 07, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close