Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Not-So-Wild West

Myth: The American West has always been heavily armed

Jonathan Thompson

On summer evenings in the former mining town of Silverton, Colo., the staccato sound of gunshots used to echo through otherwise quiet streets. A cast of stereotypical Old West characters riddled one another with bullets, as the legendary gunfighters did once upon a time in the West. Except that those kind of shoot-’em-ups didn’t happen out here. Not really.

Back in the 1950s, those fake Silverton gunfights followed a well-timed schedule, erupting when the narrow-gauge train, loaded with tourists, rolled into town. Eventually, a group of history-minded citizens gained influence and rejected the violent charade. By the 1970s, the fake gunfights were no more.

The West has always been a land of myths, where visitors can live out their dreams — and their misconceptions. Perhaps the most persistent one is that of the gunslinging West. Today, the notion persists that Westerners define themselves by their love of guns.

Like most legends, the gunfighters’ West derives from a morsel of truth. Yet, nourished by pop culture, that myth has very little in common with the history that spawned it. Even in late 19th century, Silverton’s citizens didn’t walk the streets with sidearms. There were occasional gunfights, as when a 19-year-old recidivist shot the town marshal dead in 1881.

It’s not that guns weren’t around. Hunters were armed, and at least one early newspaper editor was known to have a pistol stashed in his desk. It was not an armed citizenry that kept law and order, however, but the marshals and sheriffs. Rare flare-ups between the area Utes and white settlers were generally handled by federal soldiers. The only assault rifle back then was the Gatling gun, which was available only to soldiers at a few military posts.

Comb through the region’s early newspapers, and you’ll find only occasional mentions of killings by gun. Madmen in the Wild West didn’t shoot up schools or even saloons. Believe it or not, teachers weren’t armed.

Dynamite was a far more ubiquitous and more important symbol of the Old West’s culture. This was mining country, after all, and miners and road builders relied on explosives to make a living — and a killing. Dynamite was easy to access; in 1975, a bomber blew the Silverton Depot off its foundation.

Today, explosives are tightly regulated. Lobbyists for the explosives industry, however, have yet to proclaim that the only thing that can stop a bad guy with dynamite is a good guy with dynamite. And though I’ve known of people dynamiting ponds to more easily catch fish, I have yet to hear any politician arguing that regulating the sale of explosives is a threat to our traditional hunting-and-fishing culture.

Firearms are not integral to Western culture or identity. Take away our semi-automatic guns, our high-volume ammo clips, limit the amount of ammunition we can buy, and we’ll still be Westerners. It’s time to follow Silverton’s example and stop reducing ourselves and our region to a silly caricature manufactured by Hollywood and supported by a gun industry looking to peddle more of its deadly wares. 

Jonathan Thompson is a senior editor at High Country News (hcn.org). He lives in Durango, Colo.

Also in Commentary

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Cougar by the Tail

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Power to the People

Will Spokane step up and grab its own future?

Thomas Alan Linzey |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By {author_name}

{items2}


The Second Amendment rights of Westerners are not derived from their Western Culture or identity. Rather, like all American citizens, Westerners´ rights to keep and bear arms derive from the U.S. Constitution. Without the right to keep and bear arms, Westerners would still be Westerners, but they´d also be defenseless against tyranny or aggression. And that´s what the Second Amendment was intended to prevent.

Having been to Durango, I doubt Mr. Thompson´s views are the prevailing opinion in that community. If he believes that he looks silly living in that region, the solution is for him to move elsewhere, not infringing on the rights of his neighbors. He is entitled to his opinions, and to express them. His neighbors must endure that, and he must endure their decisions with regard to their Second Amendment rights. Jan 23, 2013 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close