Custom Blogs Search:
- - -

 

 

 
« Back to blog News

McMorris Rodgers' office explains why she voted to eliminate NPR's federal funding

Posted by DANIEL.WALTERS at 12:06 PM on Fri, Mar. 18, 2011

Yesterday, we wrote about how the Republican-dominated House of Representatives voted to eliminate federal funding for National Public Radio. This morning, we called McMorris Rodgers' office, and got Communications Director Todd Weiner. He explains that the congresswoman's support for eliminating NPR's federal funding isn't from concerns about bias — it's about basic budget cuts. She "really has no reservations against it," he says.

"This isn't about punishing 'political opponents.' It's about doing what the taxpayers want us to do," Weiner says. "We're borrowing $5 billion a day, and we'll run a record $1.6 trillion deficit. It requires tough choices. And the congresswoman felt that since families and small businesses are making those tough choices, the government should do the same. She felt this would be an appropriate place for savings."

Where other congressional representatives have concentrated on the secretly recorded video of former NPR fundraiser executive Ron Schiller insulting the Tea Party, Weiner focuses on another Schiller comment.

"Well, frankly, it is very clear that we would be better off in the long run without federal funding," Schiller was recorded as saying, "NPR would definitely survive and most of the stations would survive."

Weiner argues that some people at NPR would welcome the increased programming freedom that the lack of federal funding would provide. With only about 10 percent of NPR affiliates' funding coming from the federal government, Weiner says, there's good reason to believe NPR will be just fine. In fact, Weiner suspects that, because of all the controversy, NPR may actually come out ahead.

"It's been in public consciousness," Weiner says. "Donations will increase."

 
Tags: radio
Representative McMorris still doesn´t get it. The importance and correctness of left of center or progressive thought is a fact that must not be questioned and must always be defended. Institutions that expound such thought are, by definition correct, and must be supported and defended at all times. Anybody who disputes or even dares to question these principles is, by definition, wrong and probably evil, and must be silenced by any and all means, including ad hominem attacks and demagoguery. Mar 19, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

What an appalling vote. It´s not like we need an educated citizenry or anything to maintain a functional democracy. Certainly we wouldn´t want the public to have to trouble their poor little heads about all the difficult decisions being made in D.C. regarding the federal budget. Nope! None of our business. Let´s just take Cathy´s Communication Director´s word for it.

Barf!

I´ve only ever received generic yet disturbingly distorted email responses from her office. Leave it to Cathy to vote against your interests while looking you in the eye with a smile!

Mar 19, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close