Pin It
Favorite

Bomb Garden 

by Luke Baumgarten & r & & r & Parasites Shouldn't Kill


Next thing: the music industry -- and by that I usually mean the big four record labels as represented by the Recording Industry Association of America and its royalty-collecting offshoot, Sound Exchange -- is effectively killing Internet radio.





In March, a newish regulatory entity called the Copyright Royalty Board, at the behest of Sound Exchange, changed the way royalties are assessed. Beginning July 14, rather than pay royalties on a per play basis, stations (which often have several "channels") must pay per play, per channel and per listener.





Conservative estimates have royalty payments by stations like KYRS.org spiking by more than 600%. For places like Yahoo Music and MTV, which technically have millions of individually tailored channels, the percentage is much larger. The effect in both cases is the same. After July 14, internet radio goes away.





The main arguments made by opponents -- that art desires an audience and that radio helps introduce people to new bands and is thus a means of free promotion -- are well made, but miss the more fundamental point. The RIAA is eating itself out of house and home.





CD sales are down for good. Digital sales are up, but can't make up the difference. Internet radio is a potential gap filler, but isn't a magic bullet. The nascent industry boasts an estimated 72 million listeners monthly, but those listeners are fragmented across tens of thousands of stations. The RIAA is tampering with economies of scale that just don't work in this new, digital, choice-profuse world. Niche stations draw niche revenues and don't have margins to absorb big rate increases. By requiring such fees, the recording industry is slaughtering the million tiny, potentially industry-saving hands that feed it.





The RIAA's lack of foresight is usually just a humorous footnote in a calamitously bad fiscal decade, but now it's actually going to hurt artists and listeners. Luckily it's egregious enough to spur lawmakers to action. A bill (HR 2060) reversing the CRB's decision is before the House. All nine Washington reps (and 126 in all) have signed on as co-sponsors. But Idahoans would do well to make calls to ensure Sali and Simpson vote on the side of choice. An identical bill is moving through the Senate. Call them up too.
  • Pin It

Latest in Comment

  • Healing Forward
  • Healing Forward

    Why Spokane shouldn't try to collectively own the Dolezal scandal
    • Jun 24, 2015
  • Roll with the Changes
  • Roll with the Changes

    Publisher's Note
    • Jun 24, 2015
  • A Brokered Convention?
  • A Brokered Convention?

    The Republican field for president is a toss-up, which might bring back a familiar face at the very last minute
    • Jun 24, 2015
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon
Costuming & Cosplay on a Budget

Costuming & Cosplay on a Budget @ Spokane Valley Library

Wed., July 1, 5-8 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Luke Baumgarten

  • Chasing Whales
  • Chasing Whales

    Let's focus less on courting big companies and focus more on nurturing big ideas
    • Feb 5, 2015
  • Completely Repellent
  • Completely Repellent

    How can we expect people to find constructive uses for space that wasn't built for them?
    • Dec 30, 2014
  • Screw Big Cities
  • Screw Big Cities

    A mid-sized manifesto
    • Dec 3, 2014
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • The Rachel We Knew

    EDITOR'S NOTE: How Rachel Dolezal came to write for the Inlander
    • Jun 18, 2015
  • The Real Rachel Dolezal

    The story goes far beyond just a white woman portraying herself as black
    • Jun 17, 2015
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

marijuana


Briefs


Comment


Publisher's Note


Courts


© 2015 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation