Pin It
Favorite

Dirty Refs 

We let the referees cheat. Now why are we letting them stay in the game?

click to enlarge art15296.jpg

Remember the Fall of 2008? I mean autumn, but it seemed like the Fall of the Western World was underway. Banks were sinking, leaders were trembling and we all started throwing lots and lots of money around. Now, two years later, with the economy still stagnant, the Senate will start debating the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act — all 2,300 pages of it.

I know this is complicated, but I prefer to focus on the basic outlines: America almost collapsed because we let the referees cheat. On Wall Street, the refs are the ratings agencies like Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. They look at the product the investment banks want to sell and judge its relative safety. A rating can land anywhere from AAA to junk — investors use those ratings to decide where to grow their money.

But ratings agencies wanted to be players, not referees, watching their own stock price more than their business practices. Adding to the trouble, investment banks pick their own rater and pay them for their opinion. If it all sounds too cozy, you oficially have common sense. Agency workers have told Congress they felt pressured to rate investments a certain way for a certain client; one even said his irm became “a triple-A factory.”

So when asked to rate complex instruments made up of bundled mortgages — often not backed by down payments or loan applications — they gave ’em AAA. Then state pension funds, university foundations and even small nations bought them, only to ind out later that — sorry! — they were worthless.

S&P, Moody’s and the rest failed at the most basic requirement of their job. Now these agencies have wriggled off the reform hook with some savvy lobbying. A plan to have agencies assigned by an independent board was put off to “more study” (like 38 other items in the bill), and an effort to make them easier to sue was watered down.

I always thought we should have put the ratings agencies out of business for their crime against our economy. Either the free market would have created a better solution or the SEC could have taken on the impartial job of rating investments.

There are good things in this batch of reforms, but leaving crooked refs in the game seems no way to restore confidence that Wall Street is there for the good of us all.

Ted S. McGregor Jr. is the Editor and Publisher of The Inlander.

  • Pin It

Latest in Comment

  • A Simple Plan
  • A Simple Plan

    Impeaching judges and other modest proposals to shrink government
    • Mar 25, 2015
  • Those Teeth Are Sharp
  • Those Teeth Are Sharp

    Publisher's Note
    • Mar 25, 2015
  • Defending the System
  • Defending the System

    The American criminal justice system guarantees a defense for all; dedicated professionals make it happen
    • Mar 25, 2015
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
2015 NCAA Division 1 Woman's Regionals

2015 NCAA Division 1 Woman's Regionals @ Spokane Arena

Mon., March 30

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Ted S. McGregor Jr.

  • Those Teeth Are Sharp
  • Those Teeth Are Sharp

    Publisher's Note
    • Mar 25, 2015
  • Wins, Losses and Life
  • Wins, Losses and Life

    The parallels between the careers of father-and-son hoop stars Terry and Parker Kelly are eerie — and enlightening
    • Mar 18, 2015
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • Why Idaho kids don't go to college

    And what that means for the Gem State
    • Mar 4, 2015
  • New Blood

    Candidates are launching bids for Spokane City Council and could bring big changes to city government
    • Mar 18, 2015
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

Briefs


Comment


marijuana


Publisher's Note


long reads


© 2015 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation