Pin It
Favorite

DVD Review 

by Leah Sottile


I hate Julia Roberts just as much as any other discriminating viewer of quality cinema. In fact, Roberts' latest film, Mona Lisa Smile, had all the makings of a film I would hate: the star-studded cast of budding starlets and, even more, Roberts in the leading role of a film with supposed feminist undertones.


Moreover, it looked like an easy knockoff of Dead Poets' Society--this time for the girls, right? Hardly. Roberts, like Robin Williams in his Dead Poets' professor role, is the new teacher on the block at Wellesley College in 1953. Her newfangled West Coast-style of teaching, again like Williams', is hardly accepted in such a patrician environment. But that's where the similarities between Dead Poets' and Mona Lisa stop.


On a campus of women obsessed with the high-society traditions of their upper class upbringings, the unmarried Roberts is not only challenged for her teaching style, but because of her bare ring finger. Playing an art history professor, Roberts' character attempts to show the know-it-all Wellesley girls that learning about art isn't about regurgitating what is written down in textbooks. Instead, she tries to show her less-than-doting pupils that judging art is a subjective process. Her lesson is lost in the young girls' obsessive pursuit to become house-arrested wives.


Kirsten Dunst delivers a fine performance as a mud-slinging, Wellesley legacy who militantly resists Roberts' bohemian ideals. Dunst leads the pack of traditional Wellesley girls, with Julia Stiles as a student torn between her law school dreams and her inevitable marriage. Maggie Gyllenhaal, never one to take a traditional role, masterfully plays a student who sleeps with teachers, takes birth control pills and quickly admires Roberts for her progressive ideals.


While a good movie, Mona Lisa Smile can seem bogged down with Roberts' relentless attempts at inundating her students with her feminist ideas -- again and again she marches into the classroom and demands the girls' allegiance to her beliefs. It's frustrating to watch, perhaps because it seems odd to see Roberts in a role where she smiles less than she cries, and laughs less than she looks shocked. Regardless, she leads in a film that takes an accurate look at the subservient roles dutifully assumed by women in the 1950s, and how challenging those roles was viewed as revolutionary, objectionable and truly un-ladylike.





Publication date: 04/01/04

  • Pin It

Latest in News

  • Cherry Pitfalls
  • Cherry Pitfalls

    Why fruit is rotting on trees while workers wait at the border
    • Jul 1, 2015
  • The Real Threats
  • The Real Threats

    What worries Spokane's sheriff; plus, Washington's lawmakers finally hash out a budget
    • Jul 1, 2015
  • Party of Five?
  • Party of Five?

    Why Spokane County's newest commissioner is leading the fight to add two more
    • Jul 1, 2015
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed
Moscow ArtWalk 2015

Moscow ArtWalk 2015 @ Downtown Moscow

Tuesdays, Thursdays, Sundays. Continues through Aug. 31

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Leah Sottile

  • Imaginary Friends
  • Imaginary Friends

    The very real role that fantasy plays in our everyday lives
    • Aug 13, 2014
  • Expert Advice
  • Expert Advice

    Dab? Vape? Indica? Sativa? A few tips for beginners
    • Jul 9, 2014
  • In the Veginning
  • In the Veginning

    At the first Spokane VegFest, you'll get a bellyful, not an earful
    • Jun 18, 2014
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • The Rachel We Knew

    EDITOR'S NOTE: How Rachel Dolezal came to write for the Inlander
    • Jun 18, 2015
  • The Real Rachel Dolezal

    The story goes far beyond just a white woman portraying herself as black
    • Jun 17, 2015
  • More »

© 2015 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation