Pin It
Favorite

Montana Strikes Back 

The Supreme Court could learn a lesson on campaign finance from the Big Sky state.

click to enlarge art17407.jpg

Following decades of struggle under the political weight of mining companies, banks and railroads, Montanans passed a law in 1912 stating that “a corporation may not make a contribution or an expenditure in connection with a candidate or a political committee that supports or opposes a candidate or a political party.”

Ninety years later, in 2002, that old statute was provided an assist from D.C. through the McCain- Feingold reform act, which prohibited spending by independent organizations that aren’t contributed directly to candidate campaigns — the so-called “soft money” ban.

Then, out of the blue, in January 2010, the Supreme Court asserted that precedent didn’t matter — not among corporate friendlies, anyway — and declared most of McCain-Feingold unconstitutional. Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court, rested his argument on three major points:

1. The First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech; 2. The 14th Amendment as applied to the states through the Incorporation Doctrine, guarantees corporations the same rights as individuals; 3. To quote Kennedy, there is “little evidence of abuse that cannot be corrected through the procedures of corporate democracy.”

Once this decision, Citizens United, was on the books, two Montana corporations — one chartered in-state, another headquartered in Colorado — challenged the state’s existing law, citing Citizens United as precedent. The Montana district court agreed and issued a judgment for plaintiffs. The state appealed to the Montana State Supreme Court.

And here’s where things got really interesting. By a vote of 5-2, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the state’s 1912 law. The majority opinion was written by the Montana Chief Justice, Mike McGrath, who, notably, comes from a different world (and I’d say, a more real world) than Anthony Kennedy. He went to the University of Montana and then earned a juris doctor from Gonzaga University, not Stanford or Harvard.

But then, McGrath is from Butte, and his writing style displays a visceral quality, informed by growing up in that corporate-dominated town.

McGrath views Kennedy’s case law survey, absent context, to make no sense. (Kennedy’s opinion seems to me both overdone and bloodless — kind of like Mitt Romney defending his time at Bain Capital.)

Citing several Montana histories, McGrath exposes the absurdity of the “corporations as people doctrine,” which was first “read” into the Constitution in 1886 through a headnote that was written by the court reporter; the question was never actually argued before the Court.

As an aside: Justice Kennedy might have given some thought, if not to Montana history, at least to the history of corporate political corruption in his home state of California. The Southern Pacific Railroad bought legislators, illegally drove competitors out of business and controlled up to 11 million acres. Kennedy ignores even this context.

McGrath’s major point: Montana has a compelling state interest to protect the public from campaign-finance abuses.

Fellow Montana Justice James Nelson, who dissented from the majority only because he didn’t think that McGrath had made the necessary “compelling state interest” argument, nonetheless agreed with most of McGrath’s criticism, including his 14th Amendment analysis. Nelson writes:

Corporations are not persons. Human beings are persons, and it is an affront to the inviolable dignity of our species that courts have created a legal fiction which forces people — human beings — to share fundamental natural rights with soulless creations of government.

We know that on Wall Street and Capitol Hill, Nelson’s opinion will be viewed as subversive — a threat to the very edifice of our corporate-dominated political economy. But in the Big Sky state? It’s home-grown common sense.

Westerners, who have experienced so much life with absentee corporations, have more insight into this issue than the Anthony Kennedys ever will. Most regard his assertion that corporate campaign excesses can be controlled “through the procedures of corporate democracy” to be sheer fantasy Corporate democracy? Gosh, I must have missed that stockholder’s vote on the $40 million golden parachute the Hewlett-Packard board of directors tossed out to Carly Fiorina as she walked out the door after having run the company onto the rocks. Is he kidding?

Justice Nelson says it best:

It is utter nonsense to think that ordinary citizens or candidates can spend enough to place their experience, wisdom, and views before the voters and keep pace with the virtually unlimited spending capability of corporations to place corporate views before the electorate.

It reminds me of the movie Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. Butch’s gang is doing just fine robbing local banks. Then they rob a Union Pacific train — the railroad of Mr. E. H. Harriman of the New York Harrimans. Next thing our anti-heroes discover is that they’re being tracked by a posse, the Pinkertons, led by a man in a white hat. Over and over, Butch mutters, “Who are those guys?” For most Westerners — in fact, for most everyone living in a fly-over state — “those guys” aren’t people at all. It is nameless, faceless, absentee, corporate America.

McGrath ends his opinion by posing one last common-sense question:

When in the last 99 years did Montana lose the power or interest sufficient to support the statute, if it ever did? If the statute has worked to a degree of political and social autonomy, is the State required to throw away its protections because the shadowy backers of WTP [Western Tradition Partnership] seek to promote their interests? Does a state have to repeal or invalidate its murder prohibition if the homicide rate declines?

I’d pay to hear our arrogant and distant Supreme Court majority answer this question.

  • Pin It

Speaking of...

  • Obscene Gestures
  • Obscene Gestures

    Spokane political party leaders hope to harness post-election passion into civil discourse. But so far, there's only been more strife
    • Feb 9, 2017
  • The Other Washington
  • The Other Washington

    Our local state representatives and senators gear up for another year of fights over education, taxes and crime
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • The Gem State's Agenda
  • The Gem State's Agenda

    What to watch for in the Idaho legislature's 2017 session
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • More »

Latest in Comment

  • America's Greatest Resource
  • America's Greatest Resource

    In a country of wonderful — and destructive — contradictions, we must listen to each other
    • Feb 16, 2017
  • On the Street
  • On the Street

    Have you ever been called a "special snowflake"?
    • Feb 16, 2017
  • Independence of Mind
  • Independence of Mind

    The dance around the Neil Gorsuch nomination underlines the stakes of getting a peek inside his head
    • Feb 16, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • To Kill the Black Snake
  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • Planning a Heist
  • Planning a Heist

    Believe what many Idaho legislators are saying: They want to turn our public lands private
    • May 26, 2016
  • America's Largest Hate Group
  • America's Largest Hate Group

    Republicans are lying to people so they can capitalize on fear and hatred
    • Dec 3, 2015

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

 

Comments are closed.

Today | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon | Tue
A Little Night Music

A Little Night Music @ Spokane Civic Theatre

Thursdays-Saturdays, 7:30 p.m. and Sundays, 2 p.m. Continues through March 5

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Robert Herold

  • Independence of Mind
  • Independence of Mind

    The dance around the Neil Gorsuch nomination underlines the stakes of getting a peek inside his head
    • Feb 16, 2017
  • So Here We Are
  • So Here We Are

    Here's hoping the new president fills the office with the grace and sense of tradition it requires
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • One Free Shave
  • One Free Shave

    Donald Trump might have merited a honeymoon with voters had he managed his transition better
    • Dec 29, 2016
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • We Have Not Yet Begun to Fight

    Why we're filling the streets to protest Trump's inhumane, dangerous policies
    • Feb 2, 2017
  • Obscene Gestures

    Spokane political party leaders hope to harness post-election passion into civil discourse. But so far, there's only been more strife
    • Feb 9, 2017
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

Briefs


green zone


marijuana


Comment


do something


Readers also liked…

  • To Kill the Black Snake
  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • Who Do You Trust?
  • Who Do You Trust?

    Republicans are howling about the Iran nuclear treaty, but after a century of bad advice, should we even listen?
    • Jul 22, 2015
  • The Trumpenstein Monster
  • The Trumpenstein Monster

    Publisher's Note
    • Jul 22, 2015

© 2017 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation