Pin It
Favorite

Progressive Conservatism 

We can save money and help people

click to enlarge CALEB WALSH ILLUSTRATION
  • Caleb Walsh illustration

We live in a world where far too many are suffering far too often. Sadly, this is true not just of our world, but our nation. More than 600,000 people are homeless. More than 15 million children live in food-insecure households. Tens of millions more Americans live in poverty.

click to enlarge reuter.jpg

Conservatism has often been divided on how to meet these challenges. Social conservatives feel a moral imperative to take action. Fiscal conservatives think the costs of action would be far too expensive.

I believe there is an opportunity for a new progressive politics to emerge from the conservative movement, combining the best of fiscal and social conservatism to build a stronger nation. We can house the homeless, feed the hungry, educate every child, reduce crime and save money.

It's true that these investments will have significant, immediate costs. But they truly are investments, not only in the people they seek to serve, but also in our nation's long-term prosperity. This long-term prosperity is not found through the selection of the problems we choose to address, but rather in the tactics with which we choose to address them.

Primarily, it requires that we recognize, rather than demonize, the importance of economics in finding feasible solutions. Secondly, it requires that we see ourselves as long-term investors in the welfare of our nation.

The long-term economics point to solutions that not only reduce costs, but actually better serve the people we aim to help.

It costs less to provide a child with an education than a jail cell. It costs less to provide a homeless person with permanent housing than pay for the compounded costs of living on the street. Preventative health care costs less than the emergency room. Drug counseling and mental health services cost less than prisons.

These programs cost more in the short term, but less in the long term. That's why I call it an investment. It's a bet on the future. To put in place and expand programs doing this work would require an upfront investment for several decades before the financial rewards were fully realized.

For example, we know that effective pre-K programs can greatly reduce crime, and consequently the number of people in prison. However, the benefits for both the individuals who go through the programs and for society at large are not realized until those preschoolers graduate high school and begin lawful, productive careers. While the benefits slowly accrue, we will continue to have to pay for the costly mistakes of our current system.

On the other hand, continuing our current system will mean that the potential benefits are never realized, leaving our children worse off both socially and fiscally.

Some will argue that I am merely suggesting liberal policies, rather than a new progressive conservatism. The term itself is an oxymoron, they will say. I admit that there has been a disturbing trend of conservatives abandoning the most challenging, immediate problems of our time. But the reality is that traditional conservative fiscal analysis has the potential to provide compelling solutions, no matter what we call it.

So let's stop trying to save pennies today, at the cost of dollars and people's lives tomorrow. Let's start investing in our future. ♦

John T. Reuter, a former Sandpoint City Councilman, has been active in protecting the environment, expanding LGBT rights and Idaho's Republican Party politics.

  • Pin It

Speaking of Comment, Government

  • Puppy Love
  • Puppy Love

    Burned out by politics? Winston and his kind can help
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • What Now?
  • What Now?

    How a career change forced me to reevaluate fatherhood
    • Jun 30, 2016
  • Felonious Judgment
  • Felonious Judgment

    A community of hope and restoration can be ours with fair chance hiring
    • Jun 23, 2016
  • More »

Latest in Comment

  • Class Act
  • Class Act

    Seeing through money differences can build relationships focused on fairness
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Don's Ultimate Con
  • Don's Ultimate Con

    Trail Mix: Trump's birther problems and Johnson's polls
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Transparent Motives
  • Transparent Motives

    One candidate's an open book; the other is shrouded in secrecy. Guess which one isn't transparent enough
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • More »

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Today | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun
Inlander Debate Party

Inlander Debate Party @ nYne

Mon., Sept. 26, 5 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by John T. Reuter

  • Are You Not Entertained?
  • Are You Not Entertained?

    We cry for blood in our political fights. But this isn't reality TV — this is a real fight for the presidency
    • Sep 15, 2016
  • Good News, Bad News
  • Good News, Bad News

    Labor is winning concessions... just as robots are arriving in the workforce
    • Aug 18, 2016
  • Fat Cats
  • Fat Cats

    What Larry the Cat and our Congress have in common
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • Murrow's Nightmare

    Debate moderators need to be much more than an onstage prop to make our democracy work
    • Sep 15, 2016
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

election 2016


trail mix


Briefs


green zone


marijuana


Readers also liked…

© 2016 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation