Pin It
Favorite

Quotes & amp;amp; Notes 

by Inlander Staff


Fox Backlash? -- In 1999 on Meet the Press, when Tim Russert asked candidate George W. Bush how many missiles the U.S. would have left if the START II treaty was signed, Bush said, "I can't remember the exact number." Russert dropped the question. When Russert questioned candidate Howard Dean last summer about how many men and women serve in the U.S. military, Dean said he couldn't recall the exact number. Rather than drop the question, however, Russert followed up with, "As commander in chief, you should know that." Dean finally pegged it at between 1 and 2 million. (The actual number is 1.4 million.)


These episodes underline the growing sense that the mainstream national media has it in for Democrats while Bush gets a free pass. And according to a new survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & amp; the Press, that feeling is growing. According to their survey of 1,506 adults, 39 percent say there is bias in coverage of the presidential campaign. Meanwhile 38 percent say there is no bias -- but in 1988, 62 percent believed coverage was fair. In 2000, 19 percent of Democrats said coverage favored the GOP; today, 29 percent of Dems see media coverage unfair to their cause.


Young people are reacting by tuning out; one in five of those between 18-29 said they regularly learn something from the Internet, while another 21 percent cited comedy shows like Saturday Night Live and The Daily Show as trusted sources.





Things God Never Intended -- Ever since Mad Cow Disease surfaced on a small farm in Washington, Americans have learned the truth behind the industrialization of meat. It was scary to learn that beef often consists of parts from "downer cows," and it was equally shocking to discover that the F.D.A.'s 1997 ban on feeding cattle parts to cattle hasn't stopped the practice.


"But the grossest feedlot dish we read about in our newspapers over breakfast has to be 'chicken litter,'" writes Michael Pollan in "Cattle Futures?" published in Sunday's New York Times Magazine, "the nasty stuff shoveled out of chicken houses... Oh, yes, I forgot to mention one of the ingredients in chicken litter: chicken feces, which the U.S. cattle industry regards as a source of protein."


But perhaps Paolo Bacigalupi, writing for High Country News, put it best: "People who eat these diseased cows can contract Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease, a Germanic-sounding punishment for doing things God never intended... If ever there was a sin, the unholy act of feeding brains, spines, bones and blood back to cows is so steeped in moral and aesthetic nastiness that CJD, a disease which literally chews the brain apart, seems the only possible outcome. We have turned against nature, and now nature has turned against us."





Publication date: 1/15/04

  • Pin It

Latest in News

  • OK, Hold Your Nose
  • OK, Hold Your Nose

    Everything you need to know before Election Day
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Base of Support
  • Base of Support

    Polling local leaders and opinion-makers about presidential politics
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • The Messenger
  • The Messenger

    Local leaders weigh in on how Donald Trump's campaign has impacted racism in America
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun | Mon
Lost Egypt: Ancient Secrets, Modern Science

Lost Egypt: Ancient Secrets, Modern Science @ Northwest Museum of Arts & Culture

Tuesdays-Sundays. Continues through Jan. 6

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Inlander Staff

Most Commented On

  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • Murrow's Nightmare

    Debate moderators need to be much more than an onstage prop to make our democracy work
    • Sep 15, 2016
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

election 2016


trail mix


Briefs


green zone


marijuana


Readers also liked…

© 2016 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation