Pin It
Favorite

Sharia Law and Deadbeat Dads 

When D.C. finally does something right, nine Idaho Representatives stop it

click to enlarge CALEB WALSH ILLUSTRATION
  • Caleb Walsh illustration

On Sept. 18, 2014, Congress passed a law. In these days of an ever-increasingly dysfunctional D.C., that's news in itself — but even more significant, it was a good, bipartisan law.

The Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act is, for once, a law whose purpose is the same as its title. Largely, the law focuses on better reporting of sex trafficking to enable a more comprehensive approach to combating it and protecting children.

click to enlarge reuter.jpg

Tucked within the law is a requirement that every state's legislature will incorporate the 2007 Hague Convention on International Recovery of Child Support and Family Maintenance — which essentially makes it easier to enforce American child support orders abroad, or put even more simply, ensures that deadbeat parents pay the money they owe their families.

Deadbeat parents, though, found an ally in the Idaho legislature this year; in fact, they found nine of them. On a 9-8 vote, the Idaho House Judiciary Committee killed SB 1067, which would have enacted the new provisions into Idaho law. The bill had previously passed the Idaho Senate unanimously and enjoyed bipartisan support in the committee.

Not passing SB 1067 meant removing Idaho from the federal system and jeopardizes $200 million in child-support payments to Idaho children. On top of that, Idaho stands to lose up to another $46 million in federal funds and will likely have to lay off more than 100 state employees.

So why did nine members of the committee unite to stop Idaho children from getting child support payments? Sharia law.

Perhaps that strikes you as an odd and bizarre reason to punish Idaho's children and refuse to support an international treaty to hold deadbeat parents accountable. It might strike you that way because it is.

The argument from the nine members of the committee who voted to support deadbeat parents (Republican Reps. Thomas Dayley, Lynn Luker, Shannon McMillan, Kathleen Sims, Janet Trujillo, Don Cheatham, Ryan Kerby, Ronald Nate and Heather Scott) was that passing the law could expose Idaho to the laws of other nations, including those that live under Sharia law, and eliminate due process for our citizens.

There are a number of problems with this argument, but the biggest is that it is simply not true. The law explicitly protects due process for Idahoans and is about making it possible for America's laws to be enforced on its citizens overseas, not on Americans by other nations.

The fact that these arguments are not true didn't stop Rep. Luker from sending out an editorial, through a spokesperson, reiterating them to the press and the entire Republican caucus; this led to some lawmakers offering a different perspective.

My favorite came from North Idaho Republican Representative and former prosecutor Luke Malek: "Representative Luker does not speak for Idaho or me. Scuttling SB 1067 without debate was heavy-handed opportunistic theatrics at the expense of single parents and children, the most vulnerable in our society. I do not support the erratic behavior that will lead to the dismantling of our child support system, nor the implication that this mockery of a legal analysis in any way represents our Republican caucus."

The legislature has gone home for the year, but Governor Otter could call them back to fix this mess. Hopefully he will decide to do so and side with Idaho's kids, rather than the nine Idaho legislators who chose to act like spoiled children. ♦

John T. Reuter, a former Sandpoint Councilman, has been active in protecting Idaho's environment, expanding LGBT rights and the Idaho GOP.

Tags:

  • Pin It

Latest in Comment

  • Children Will Listen
  • Children Will Listen

    How art speaks to life in this particular moment
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • So Here We Are
  • So Here We Are

    Here's hoping the new president fills the office with the grace and sense of tradition it requires
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • Get Big Money Out
  • Get Big Money Out

    Letters to the Editor
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • More »

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Today | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri
Women's March on Spokane

Women's March on Spokane @ Spokane Convention Center

Sat., Jan. 21, 11 a.m.-4 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by John T. Reuter

  • Children Will Listen
  • Children Will Listen

    How art speaks to life in this particular moment
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • Common Ground
  • Common Ground

    Scotchman Peaks is an American treasure in our very own backyard
    • Dec 15, 2016
  • A Way Forward
  • A Way Forward

    Five things we can (and must) do without Washington, D.C.
    • Nov 17, 2016
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • One Free Shave

    Donald Trump might have merited a honeymoon with voters had he managed his transition better
    • Dec 29, 2016
  • The Landed and the White

    How Americans followed tradition when they voted for Trump
    • Jan 12, 2017
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment

Comment


Briefs


marijuana


green zone


Politics


Readers also liked…

  • To Kill the Black Snake
  • To Kill the Black Snake

    Historic all-tribes protest at Standing Rock is meant to stop the destruction of the earth for all
    • Sep 8, 2016
  • Healing Forward
  • Healing Forward

    Why Spokane shouldn't try to collectively own the Dolezal scandal
    • Jun 24, 2015

© 2017 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation