Pin It

The Black Dahlia 

Los Angeles, 1947. The body of a beautiful, young aspiring actress is found cut in half at the waist, her cheeks slashed to give her a macabre, post-mortem smile. Chunks of her flesh have been neatly cut out. The body is clean. Her eyes are wide open.

Whodunnit? No one knows. The newspapers go crazy and dub her "the Black Dahlia," after The Blue Dahlia, a film from the year before. Her real name is Elizabeth Short. She's from small-town Massachusetts. The LAPD entertains hundreds of suspects, interviews thousands. Still, nothing but empty leads, even now, 60 years later.

Real sensational stuff. Of course, I learned all of that from Wikipedia and amateur sleuth Web pages. Brian De Palma's film didn't shed much light. With its stylized cover seeming to promise a dark, twisted journey deep into the bowels of the case, the movie instead uses Los Angeles' most notorious unsolved murder as the mere background for a confused, disjointed story about two detectives investigating the case and how it makes them feel.

Of course, that's not entirely De Palma's fault. The film is an adaptation of the novel by James Ellroy. But De Palma, for his part, is at least guilty of miscasting, flawed execution and a jumbled storyline. Black Dahlia's two protagonist cops (Aaron Eckhart and Josh Hartnett) are undeveloped. The normally scintillating Scarlett Johansson is laughable as a '40s seductress. And why does Hilary Swank -- as the spoiled daughter of a Hollywood magnate -- keep noting her uncanny resemblance to Mia Kirshner (as Short) when it couldn't be further from the truth?

The film intends to show how the Dahlia case unravels the lives of everyone it touches, but in the end it's only the film that unravels -- to the point that the "solving" of the unsolved case just seems like a footnote at the end.

The DVD's wealth of bonus features should have supplemented the film with a deeper look into the case itself. It doesn't. Although James Ellroy provides some background regarding the differences between the real case and the film, it does more to illustrate those between the book and the film, and reality's left behind again. There's a nice section on the De Palma touch -- his use of color and camera motion. But such back-patting for such a flawed film is, well, a mystery. (Rated R)

  • Pin It

Latest in Film

  • Print (and Reprint) the Legend
  • Print (and Reprint) the Legend

    Jackie keeps repeating its intriguing ideas about turning people into icons
    • Jan 12, 2017
  • Gangster's Bore
  • Gangster's Bore

    Ben Affleck directs and stars in Live by Night, but forgets to add some excitement
    • Jan 12, 2017
  • Crucial Stuff
  • Crucial Stuff

    Hidden Figures rights wrongs both cinematic and historic
    • Jan 5, 2017
  • More »


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun
In Order of Disappearance

In Order of Disappearance @ The Kenworthy

Tue., Jan. 17, 7 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks


More by Joel Smith

Most Commented On

Top Tags in
Music & Film




Readers also liked…

  • Where Are the Women?
  • Where Are the Women?

    A critic's year-long deep dive into the way movies portray half of humanity
    • May 12, 2016
  • Spy vs. Spy
  • Spy vs. Spy

    The Man from U.N.C.L.E. carves out a unique space in a crowded espionage marketplace
    • Aug 12, 2015

© 2017 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation