Member since Mar 23, 2013



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Recent Comments

Re: “The Slow Death of Cursive

For what it´s worth, there are handwriting apps fir the iPhone and iPad: two that I recommend (as a handwriting teacher) are called BETTER LETTERS (iPhone) and LETTERS MAKE WORDS (iPad).
So someone in cyberland still thinks handwriting matters ... but does cursive matter?
Research shows: the fastest and most legible handwriters join only some letters, not all of them: making the easiest joins, skipping the rest, and using print-like shapes for those letters whose cursive and printed shapes disagree. (Citations appear below.)
Often, cursive programs and teachers strongly discourage such practices. Students learning cursive are taught to join all letters, and to use different shapes for cursive versus printed letters. (These requirements do not align with the research findings above.)
When following the rules doesn´t work as well as breaking them, it’s time to re-write and upgrade the rules. The discontinuance of cursive offers a great opportunity to teach some better-functioning form of handwriting that is actually closer to what the fastest, clearest handwriters do anyway. (There are indeed textbooks and curricula teaching handwriting this way. Cursive and printing are not the only choices.)
Reading cursive still matters — this takes just 30 to 60 minutes to learn, and can be taught to a five- or six-year-old if the child knows how to read. The value of reading cursive is therefore no justification for writing it.
(In other words, we could simply teach kids to _read_ old-fashioned handwriting and save the year-and-a-half that are expected to be enough for teaching them to _write_ that way too ... not to mention the actually longer time it takes to teach someone to perform such writing _well_.)
Remember, too: whatever your elementary school teacher may have been told by her elementary school teacher, cursive signatures have no special legal validity over signatures written in any other way. (Don´t take my word for this: talk to any attorney.)
/1/ Steve Graham, Virginia Berninger, and Naomi Weintraub.
1998: on-line at http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/27542168.pdf
/2/ Steve Graham, Virginia Berninger, Naomi Weintraub, and William Schafer.
1998: on-line at http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/27542188.pdf
(NOTE: there are actually handwriting programs that teach this way: names on request.
Shouldn´t there be more of them?)
Yours for better letters,
Kate Gladstone
Handwriting Repair/Handwriting That Works
and the World Handwriting Contest

Posted by KateGladstone on 01/23/2013 at 11:30 AM

Re: “Obsolete?

Re the literacy coordinator´s claim that " cursive’s speed ... allows standardized test takers to write their answers faster" --
In fact, research shows that the fastest and clearest handwriters avoid cursive. Highest-speed highest-legibility handwriters join only some, not all, of the letters -- making the easiest joins, skipping the rest -- and tend to use print-like letter-shapes for those letters whose cursive and printed shapes disagree.
For more details and resources, including source citation for the above, visit the "Handwriting Rebels" page at http://www.HandwritingThatWorks.com/WritingRebels.html .
Kate Gladstone
Director, the World Handwriting Contest
Handwriting specialist, Handwriting Repair/Handwriting That Works

Posted by KateGladstone on 10/12/2010 at 6:04 PM

© 2019 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation