Pin It

Plaintiffs Speak 

by Cara Gardner

For many, the current hearings in the Washington Supreme Court regarding marriage equality are interesting side notes in the ongoing battle over the right of homosexuals to marry legally. But for Marge Ballack and Diane Lantz, two plaintiffs in the case against the state's Defense of Marriage Act, it's not just about the larger issues of tolerance and civil rights, it's also a personal quest to validate their love.

"Diane and I have been together for 27 years. It was love at first sight," Ballack says. "Shortly after that, I moved in with her and her kids, and we started our family."

The Spokane couple was married in British Columbia on July 21, 2003. "It gave us a sense of normalcy and being like everyone else," Ballack says. "We have the same goals and aspirations as heterosexual couples. We just don't have the same rights."

The United States recognized legal marriages in Canada until 38 states, including Washington, passed versions of the Defense of Marriage Act, which nullified that recognition and is now being challenged in the state's Supreme Court.

After 27 years in a committed relationship, Ballack and Lantz say they know as much about marriage as anyone and deserve to have that legal and social title. "I think it's about having a committed relationship that's recognized by everyone," Ballack says. "With our friends and family, there's no question in their mind, and legally we want that right. We're being discriminated against."

Though Ballack and Lantz are already married - in Canada - they plan on having a new ceremony here at home. "We're going to have a wedding -- nothing too big -- and invite friends and family," says Ballack.

Ballack acknowledges that one important reason to be married is that it will give her and Lantz legal rights that unmarried couples don't have. "We've spent hundreds on legal documents that give us responsibilities that [married] heterosexual couples just automatically have," she explains. "I could marry some guy off the street right now and within minutes, he'd have access to records that we have to jump through hoops to get. It's ridiculous."

She says being legally allowed to make important decisions regarding finances and health care is just one aspect of legalizing her marriage with Lantz. The important part, Ballack stresses, is that marriage should be granted because America is a nation of equal rights.

"We've been chased and screamed at and spit on, and we don't want that to happen to anyone else," Ballack says. "Being a spokesperson is a small price to pay for maybe helping someone else."

Publication date: 03/10/05

Pin It
Today | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
MLK Day Weekend Celebration

MLK Day Weekend Celebration @ Downtown Spokane

Sun., Jan. 20 and Mon., Jan. 21

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Cara Gardner

  • Pride or Prejudice?

    Jim West may have overcompensated for his closeted sexual identity by voting against gay rights legislation. But how are his fellow Republicans dealing with the news that the powerful conservative has admitted to sexual relationships with
    • Jul 8, 2005
  • Weapon of Mass Doubt

    Scott Ritter has been called "an honest man lost in Washington" by Forbes and "the most famous renegade Marine officer" by the New York Times. A former marine captain and the former chief weapons inspector for Unscom, the agency in charge
    • Jun 23, 2005
  • Nightlife- Dance Clubs

    The Big Easy 919 W. Sprague * 244-3279 It's a weird phenomenon, the one R. Kelly describes when he sings, "I don't see nothin' wrong / With a little bump and grind." Bankers by day become "bumpers" by night; college students during the we
    • Jun 23, 2005
  • More »

© 2019 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation