I-1183

[
        
          {
            "name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
            "insertPoint": "5",
            "component": "25846487",
            "requiredCountToDisplay": "5"
          },{
            "name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
            "insertPoint": "10",
            "component": "25846487",
            "requiredCountToDisplay": "10"
          },{
            "name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
            "insertPoint": "15",
            "component": "25846487",
            "requiredCountToDisplay": "15"
          },{
            "name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
            "insertPoint": "20",
            "component": "25846487",
            "requiredCountToDisplay": "20"
          }
        
      ]

Alcohol is already widely available. The addition of liquors in other
places as specified in I-1183, will not increase crime or "endanger our
kids lives and futures". That is because ethyl alcohol effects the human
body the same, whether it comes from cheap beers or Jose Cuervo. The only
major difference is the amount of and possibly the time needed to become
intoxicated, the end result is the same. Your argument is flawed from start
to finish. The irony of you saying that "not everyone should be voting"
was by far my favorite part of your ignorant ramble.

Search

I-1183