RE: RE: Birthday Suit
[
{
"name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
"insertPoint": "5",
"component": "25846487",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "5"
},{
"name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
"insertPoint": "10",
"component": "25846487",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "10"
},{
"name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
"insertPoint": "15",
"component": "25846487",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "15"
},{
"name": "Broadstreet - Instory",
"insertPoint": "20",
"component": "25846487",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "20"
}
]
Let me just say, nobody was condemning nudity or nudists. What is being
condemned is "indecent exposure" which is illegal even on your own property
when in view of the public. And is a felony in some cases when the victim
is under age. Also your understanding of what is "normal" and "abnormal"
seems clouded. Purposely exposing yourself to the unwilling public is not
only abnormal but it's perverse. Before you "rant" about someones Jeer read
the article more carefully so you better understand what to rant about!
This was about the negative affects nudity has on unwilling
victims/children, not about your own issues with abnormality.
© 2024 Inlander
