Pin It

Shock to the System 

Washington state's voting system hasn't changed for 70 years, which may explain why voters are confused, frustrated -- even angry -- about the new primary ballot. Instead of simply checking the box next to any candidate, people must first choose from four primary ballots on September 14: Democrat, Republican, Libertarian or nonpartisan, and then vote for only the candidates on that ballot. If people vote for candidates on more than one ballot, their vote may not count.

They don't agree on much, but one thing the Democrat, Republican and Libertarian parties of Washington state did band together on was a lawsuit over the right to control the primary elections. The parties collectively sued the state, claiming that Washington's blanket primary, in which citizens could vote for whomever they wanted, was unconstitutional. If candidates were representing political parties, they claimed, then those parties had a right to control the voting process -- and they won.

"What the court said is that we in Washington can't have it both ways," explains Sam Reed, Washington's Secretary of State. "Either we have the freedom to vote for whomever we choose and then just the top vote-getters move ahead, or we nominate candidates for each political party."

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the political parties and declared Washington state's blanket primary system unconstitutional. For the first time in more than 70 years, voters will have to choose a political party in the primaries. It's important to note, however, that in November's general election, people can still vote across parties without canceling out their votes.

"In most of the states around the country, you have to pick a political party, either when you register [to vote] or at the primaries," Reed says. "We are very unusual. Actually the further West you go, the more open it is. California, Washington and Alaska are the only states with a blanket primary."

Well, not anymore -- at least for this election. The court ruling and the new ballot have enraged so many Washington voters that it may not be around for long.

"It's limiting," notes Steve Gustafson, a Spokane attorney. "Anytime you limit someone's ability to choose something, that's not good." Gustafson doesn't seem impressed by the $1.7 million the state is spending on public education to tune voters in on the new system, either. "I think it just adds confusion to the average person." Confusion -- and more than a little fuel to the political fire.

Reed says his office has received more than 14,000 calls and more than 3,000 letters and e-mails -- most of them from people criticizing the new primary system. He had to hire 12 temporary staffers just to manage all the complaints. Yet rather than feeling defensive, Reed says he's awed by the feedback.

"What impresses me is that people take voting so seriously and have such a passion for their right to vote for whom they want to vote for," says Reed. "It has to do with a long history and tradition of people [in Washington] voting for whomever they want."

Indeed, the recent debate over our primary elections is something of a deja vu; back in the 1930s, Washington citizens went through a similar debate. Candidates were voted onto ballots through party conventions -- but citizens, who wanted to be able to vote for anyone, passed a referendum freeing up the primaries from partisan stipulations. Now Washington citizens are faced once again with the challenge of maintaining control over their primaries. Reed says based on what he's seen, voters aren't giving up their blanket primaries. More than 300,000 signatures were collected to put Initiative 872 on the November ballot for the general election. If I-872 passes, this new primary system, where voters must choose a party, will be dead and the blanket primary will return, with the top two vote- getters, regardless of political affiliation, making the cut to the general election.

"The polling that has been done in the state shows given the choice, people overwhelmingly would prefer the top two vote-getters," Reed says.

Here's the irony: Many of the voters upset over having to choose a party in the primary elections are threatening not to vote -- at all. If the people with strong opinions about controlling their primaries don't vote in November, I-872 may not pass and the political parties will keep their new primary system the way it is. Reed says boycotting the elections is never a good form of protest.

"People would be making a mistake not to participate. We have important races [in the primary]," he explains. "Like the 5th District congressional race; whoever wins that Republican primary [there are three Republican candidates] could end up being in Congress for a long time. It's true for the 8th District, too -- [and] the Governor's race and the Attorney General's race. There are very important offices, and [they have] a significant impact on our future."

  • Pin It

Speaking of Election 2004

  • The Big Election

    Election Day news from around the nation
    • Nov 4, 2004
  • Counting Conundrum

    It's almost become routine anymore; on Election Night, Washingtonians go to bed knowing that more votes are yet to be counted. In any close race, it'll be as least a few more days until a winner can be crowned. Why does it take so da
    • Oct 8, 2004
  • A Race to Lead

    As the presidential campaign picked at scabs of the Vietnam War, our gubernatorial race reopened the wounds of the struggle for civil rights. Reliving of the 1960s began with a Seattle Times story on Monday, Aug. 23, about Attorney
    • Oct 8, 2004
  • More »

Latest in News

  • Rich Man, Poor Men
  • Rich Man, Poor Men

    Can the wealthiest U.S. president ever help the poorest U.S. citizens?
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • La Resistance
  • La Resistance

    Michael Moore, Congressional Democrats and local progressives: How they are resisting Donald Trump's agenda
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • Must-See TV?
  • Must-See TV?

    Alternatives to the inauguration (and how to make watching more fun if you have to)
    • Jan 18, 2017
  • More »


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Today | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri
Women's March on Spokane

Women's March on Spokane @ Spokane Convention Center

Sat., Jan. 21, 11 a.m.-4 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

More by Cara Gardner

  • Pride or Prejudice?

    Jim West may have overcompensated for his closeted sexual identity by voting against gay rights legislation. But how are his fellow Republicans dealing with the news that the powerful conservative has admitted to sexual relationships with
    • Jul 8, 2005
  • Weapon of Mass Doubt

    Scott Ritter has been called "an honest man lost in Washington" by Forbes and "the most famous renegade Marine officer" by the New York Times. A former marine captain and the former chief weapons inspector for Unscom, the agency in charge
    • Jun 23, 2005
  • Plaintiffs Speak

    For many, the current hearings in the Washington Supreme Court regarding marriage equality are interesting side notes in the ongoing battle over the right of homosexuals to marry legally. But for Marge Ballack and Diane Lantz, two plaintif
    • Jun 23, 2005
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • One Free Shave

    Donald Trump might have merited a honeymoon with voters had he managed his transition better
    • Dec 29, 2016
  • The Landed and the White

    How Americans followed tradition when they voted for Trump
    • Jan 12, 2017
  • More »

Top Tags in
News & Comment




green zone


Readers also liked…

  • Waiting For Their Place
  • Waiting For Their Place

    Rapid Re-Housing programs still mean months of homelessness for many local families
    • Jun 10, 2015
  • The Rachel We Knew
  • The Rachel We Knew

    EDITOR'S NOTE: How Rachel Dolezal came to write for the Inlander
    • Jun 18, 2015

© 2017 Inlander
Website powered by Foundation