Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Civics Lessons

Why studying American history is essential to being a good citizen

George Nethercutt

Last year, The Inlander interviewed Spokane City Council candidates to test their knowledge of Spokane. After all, the officials we elect to public office should actually possess a depth of knowledge of the issues facing their community — and our nation.

When I ran for Congress in 1994, one concern I had as I debated Speaker Tom Foley nine separate times (most of them televised nationally) was that I would be asked some obscure, simple question about the 5th Congressional District or national history which I could not answer, and that lack of knowledge — regardless of its relative significance — would define me for the upcoming election. Thankfully, it never happened, and I eked out a victory that year, in part, by being well prepared on the issues.

Since leaving office in 2005, I’ve developed the non-profit, non-partisan, charitable Nethercutt Foundation (www.nethercuttfoundation.org) to help college students receive a better “civics” education, so that they deeply understand America’s great story. Students from universities as close as Spokane and as far away as Pennsylvania have been admitted to our program to study our founding documents, learn leadership lessons and understand significant events in American history that have led to our country’s growth and prosperity. The students travel all-expenses-paid to Washington, D.C., to spend 10 days meeting with elected officials, lobbyists, government leaders and members of the national press. As I accompany the students, I see them immersed in the study of how the federal government actually works. They then return home to dedicate 60 hours to a government or quasi-government entity to get into the important habit of helping others. This experience will make them better citizens, potential principled leaders and compassionate, informed participants in American democracy.

But it’s not only young people who need the education the Foundation provides to the small group of students selected for the program each year. Numerous surveys show that most adult Americans are ignorant about American history. A 2008 survey by the non-profit Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) tested 2,508 adults on their civic knowledge and compared those with and without a college education. The test covered information drawn from U.S. naturalization exams and the U.S. Department of Education high school progress tests. Sadly, 71 percent of those taking the exam failed it. The overall score was 49 percent. College graduates scored only 57 percent on the exam — still a failing grade.

In 2006 and 2007, ISI tested 14,000 college freshmen and seniors from 50 American universities with 65 multiple-choice questions covering such topics as American government, historical facts, economics and foreign policy. The findings: America’s college students overwhelmingly failed even the most basic knowledge of American government and history. Harvard was the only university with students able to pass the test — with an underwhelming D . Seniors performed only slightly better than freshmen, showing that even the finest universities across the United States do little to enhance a student’s civic knowledge.

Why do these results matter? Because the issues facing our country have profound consequences to all Americans, regardless of their social status, income levels, race, religion or education. Uninformed citizens are captive to those who make decisions affecting our lives, whether in Spokane, Olympia or Washington, D.C.

Another astonishing finding that emerged from the 2008 study was that elected officials scored lower (only 43 percent) on the exam than the average adult, perhaps explaining why our state and nation seem so inefficiently run, even with more government employees and bigger state and national budgets — and the resulting staggering debts. A recent study of business and employment trends in Washington state showed that through 2017, government shows the greatest growth and the most employees of any sector of the economy. At the federal level, President Obama plans to hire 140,000 new federal employees by the end of 2010. The average federal salary is about $75,000; there are now over 2 million civilian federal employees. Pretty soon, government will be so big and spend so much that elected officials will have little spending discretion — their hands will be too tied with public debt.

That’s why I’m focusing this column, and future columns, on the need for Americans to understand national policies and issues and to know why government works as it does. My new book, In Tune with America: Our History in Song, is due out in local bookstores in Spokane on April 14. It teaches the essentials of the story of the United States through the music of American history. The information in the book contains basic civics knowledge lacking in too many Americans. It is punctuated by the songs written during important eras of U.S. history that recite a first-hand account, in rhyme and music, of how our history has unfolded — at the time it was unfolding.

Readers of this column will be afforded a perspective deeper than those given in 30-second sound bites on television news. It will be a perspective borne of the knowledge all Americans should have of our founding principles, enhanced by the insights and perspectives formed by my 10 years of congressional service. I hope that reading this column will be educational and enlightening — because our nation is blessed by the toil and sacrifice of thousands, just like us, who built it, through all of its challenges. Whatever our station in life, each of us has an obligation to study and know the history of how and why the United States came to exist.

It’s our civic duty.

From 1995-2005, George Nethercutt was the Republican Congressman from Spokane. His column will appear once a month in The Inlander. Send comments totheeditor@inlander.com.

Also in Commentary

New Frontiers

While the Old West still feeds the mythology of the region, the New West commands a new paradigm

Michael Dax |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

The Sports Mafia

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 22,2013

The English Way

Justice Scalia finds his rationale for an expansive Second Amendment in Common Law — so why does Great Britain have such strict gun control?

Robert Herold |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

What We Pay For

Publisher's Note

Ted S. McGregor Jr. |
Wednesday, May 15,2013

Keeping America

Announcing a new local effort to inspire today’s students to learn where their country came from

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, May 7,2013

Also By George Nethercutt

Commentary

Middle East Mettle

How Obama handles Egypt will help define his presidency.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, February 9,2011

Wild Ride Coming Up

Our president has no platform to run on. Get ready to watch him attack his Republican challengers.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, January 11,2012

Losing a Generation

Millennials who turned out in 2008 may tune this election out.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, April 11,2012

The Right Ratio

In the debate over how wealthy some Americans should be, we should first consider our free-market traditions.

George Nethercutt |
Wednesday, March 7,2012

Country Without a Cause

The “dullest campaign ever” needs a dose of big, bold ideas

George Nethercutt |
Tuesday, August 7,2012


Perhaps Nethercut could expound on the difference between "America" and the United States of America? It appears that he is ignorant of the fact that America is a continent and not a nation. Most any 3rd grader can tell you that America extends from Canada to Chile.




"The information in the book contains basic civics knowledge lacking in too many Americans"




Seems that Nethercut should be targeting his own ignorance instead of spreading it to everyone else.




BTW did his Youth Indoctrination program include people, events, viewpoints from both sides of the fence or just the crazy side?




For a first time out Commentary, its obvious that Nethercut is on an agenda to attempt to brainwash people. Didn´t he campaign on election reform and promise to not run for a second term? The Inlander should be doing an expose´ of Nethercut to find out where his dirt lies (sorry nice pun) so that your readers have a proper perspective of his spew.

Apr 02, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

He is using the term "America" in the colloquial sense. The average spokane resident knows that he means U.S.A. by "America." As far as your second point here is a sample itinerary from the foundation website.





Day 3


Senator Patty Murray (D-WA)


White House Tour (arrive by 9:45am)


Lunch with George at the Dubline


Congresswoman Cathy McMorris (R-5th WA)


Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA)


Watch the Senate Floo





As you can see it is non-partisan. Please be more open minded in the future and do some research. Apr 02, 2010

 

CHECK IT OUT - http://nethercuttfoundation.org/ Apr 02, 2010

 

I should remind Mr. Nethercutt--reguarding our economic system being "the best"--what the Father of our constitution had to say about




"A government operating by corrupt influence; substituting the motive of private interest in place of public duty; converting its pecuniary dispensations into bounties to favorites or bribes to opponents; accommodating its measures to the avidity of a part of the nation instead of the benefit of the whole: in a word, enlisting an army of interested partizans, whose tongues, whose pens, whose intrigues, and whose active combinations, by supplying the terror of the sword, may support a real domination of the few under an apparent liberty of the many. Such a government, wherever to be found, is an imposter" -- James Madison (Spirit of Governments published February 20, 1792 in the National Gazette)





Or what the author of our ´Declaration of Independence´ had to say about corporate interests 150 years before the first ´bailouts´




 "England exhibits the most remarkable phaenomenon in the universe in the contrast between the profligacy of it’s government and the probity of it’s citizens... I hope we shall take warning from the example and crush in it’s birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."

-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Logan (Nov. 16, 1916) 




 




Or how the Authors of the Massachusettes Constitution of 1780 (yes, written DURING the war for independence) stated the case for the necessity of future generations to actively work in reforming government to serve THE PEOPLE:





"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men: Therefore the people alone have an incontestible unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."

Apr 09, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Very unimpressed with this bland stump speech for the Nethercutt Foundation.




Our collective lack of civic knowledge is unfortunate, but it is hardly new news. Can´t you find someone to comment in depth on why our educational systems aren´t preparing students for full participation in our democratic republic? Someone, say, like Robert Herold who is actually in education professionally and probably has much more thought provoking observations to share on the topic? 




I have to admit, this looks like the Inlander is blatanly capitulating to local conservative pressure to have a more "balanced" public voice. While I also take issue with much of Paul Haeder´s inflammatory rhetoric, this "out with Paul, in with George" move is pretty blasé. I could have the details wrong on this but the perception is there.  




C´mon Inlander. You are supposed to be the Inland Northwest´s ALTERNATIVE weekly. Just because the Spokesman is shrinking doesn´t mean you have to take over their traditional stance in the marketplace. Grow a spine. Or at least recruit a Republican with some real grit and insight.

Apr 14, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

Wow Spovagilist dudette:





When ya live in a glasshouse, don’t throw stones….sis





Ya could have log into the Inlander under your own name (M McK) yo





Yet you logged in under the name of your blog….a bit self promoting don’t ya think yo?





FCGN has a good idea; history is important yo; he could be back in DC makin major money as a lobbyist yo,





Yet he is here in his home hamlet promoting an organization to send kids to DC to learn about US American History…yo





What an absolute bastard …or so you are saying there sis?





I’d pack my dog and my duds and would jump at the chance yo to go to DC to learn about US History in a Spokane pico-second yo…





Don’t be hatin M McK yo….





If FCGN wants to self-promote their sis; let him…it is a good idea and a good organization so far yo…





Petty is never pretty….sis….





May 12, 2010

 

"A People´s History of the United States" by the late Howard Zinn is essential for anyone interested in the history of our country. Accounts taken from laymen, pastors, and slaves gives us a different perspective than what our elementary and highschool text books propose. Instead of the "rich white male elite" perspective that fills the public school text books, we get stories from the working class and the poor. Nethercutt only perpetuates the "white, male, elite" portion of history. And that´s sad.

Apr 30, 2010 | Reply to this comment

 

I looked up Zinn yo. Here is what I found in his own words yo





Professor Zinn announces the overtly political agenda of A People’s History in an explanatory coda to the 1995 edition. Zinn explains to the reader that he has no interest in striving for objectivity, and that his history is ‘a biased account.’ Professor Zinn explains: ‘I am not troubled by that. I wanted my writing of history and my teaching of history to be a part of the social struggle. I wanted to be a part of history and not just a recorder and teacher of history. So that kind of attitude towards history, history itself is a political act, has always informed my writing and my teaching.’





This Zinn dude is not interested in teaching history yo; he is interested in a socialist political agenda of his own yo…





The founding fathers and especially George Washington have no equal in history yo…Washington was not only the first president in history bro, he was the first person in history to turn down being crowned a king for the sake of the vision for self rule yo. The first time this has ever happened bro….





The founding fathers could not help they were white dudes yo…yet they worked together to change the world and made it better place yo. Any group in history yo, Chinese, Romans, Egyptians, Eskimos, Greeks etc could have gone with self rule yet they didn’t bro. It took 18 centuries past the birthday of Jesus for humans to come up with self rule that works…and the US American Founding Fathers were the first people to do it yo….





We are here today thanks to those white dudes yo. Don’t be hatin yo… Don’t be such a racist yo….





May 12, 2010

 

Going back and reading these old columns gives me something interesting to think about and do in retirement, and I plan to continue. In this first article, I find two items that jumped out to call my attention to them. First and foremost:

"A(fter) I accompany the students...in the(ir) study of (the workings of) the federal government, (t)hey then return home to dedicate 60 hours to a government or quasi-government entity to get into the important habit of helping others."

I read this article with the awareness that The Nethercutt Foundation is stated to be bipartisan in nature, as well as the awareness of its founder as a former Republican Member of Congress. On the surface, however, this seems a direct contradiction of the stated focus of the Republican Party, as well as in contradistinction to the views of the Founders and those prominent literary figures who came later, such as Thoreau and Emerson.

Its bipartisan nature also seems to ignore the role that the elective process plays in how the nation is to be governed, and lead it towards a maintenance of the status quo by government in its entirety, rather than the creation of a more perfect Union by all of We the People, as the Preamble states is our goal.

We have, after all, come to know the Republican Party through the elective process, and judge its collective effectiveness, especially its emphasis on the "Self Reliance" (see Emerson in the Harvard Classics) of all the individuals who make up We the People, and the accompanying values of hard work and industry which reduce our dependence upon government to serve our needs.

Granted, it should be the goal of both political parties to reduce the size of the federal government and its accompanying bureaucracy, particularly the over-weighted Executive Branch of the tree of government, including that portion devoted to the promotion of the general wefare of individual citizens, but it´s not realistic in at this stage of the game to expect any change at all from the party who promised that change in 2008, and ignoring the reality of partisan politics in elections is hardly contributing to the goal of the Founders.

The second item in the article that caught my attention were the statements that "...the issues facing our country have profound consequences to all Americans, regardless of their social status, income levels, race, religion or education. Uninformed citizens are captive to those who make decisions affecting our lives, whether in Spokane, Olympia or Washington, D.C."

These statements require very little comment, of course. They don´t lead me to think and write so much as to restate the second sentence´s message as I interpreted it first, forgetting that Mr. Nethercutt is no longer in Congress: Uninformed citizens are captive to those who make decisions affecting their own lives, whether in local, state, or national government. (Not a bad way, after all, to say either that "We the People get the government We the People deserve." or even "Watch out! Better learn your civics or else!") I simply would have said, however, considering the fact that Mr. Nethercutt is no longer in Congress, and considering his opening statement that he worried about being informed enough about basic facts of government, "We uninformed citizens are captive...." Etc.

Thanks to the Inlander and Mr. Nethercutt for the enjoyable couple of hours. Sep 27, 2011 | Reply to this comment

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close