Custom Blogs Search:
- - -

 

 

 
« Back to blog Arts

Trouble at the Symphony

Posted by HEIDI.GROOVER at 05:26 PM on Fri, Oct. 19, 2012

symphony.jpegThe Spokane Symphony and its musicians appear to be at an impasse over contract negotiations.

Despite a balanced budget last year, the Symphony is looking to pay its musicians less, according to a press release from the musicians' union. In recent contract negotiations, the symphony proposed $15,132 salaries, down from $17,460.

"Those of us struggling to cobble together a living wouldn't be able to do that [under the proposed contract]," says Adam Wallstein, the orchestra's timpanist and leader of the committee negotiating for a new contract.

The musicians are paid a set salary per year under a maximum number of "services" — times they play, rehearse or do Symphony-related educational events.

Symphony Executive Director Brenda Nienhouse says the symphony isn't able to schedule enough performances and events to use up that maximum — 180 times a year for the orchestra's most essential musicians — so it's paying for more time than musicians are actually playing.

"What we're offering is the same per-service amount," Nienhouse says. "We happily pay for services we can use."

In today's economy, with many one-time gifts propping up the Symphony's budget, the non-profit's board has to "be a good financial steward," Nienhouse says.

But Wallstein isn't buying it. One-time gifts will always be the lifeblood of non-profits, he says, and it's the Symphony's job to schedule more shows and make more money. He wouldn't give specific figures, but he says the musicians aren't asking for a pay raise. They just can't take the cuts the symphony wants.

"We remain quite willing to go back to the table," he says. "I'm still optimistic."

 
Fred seems to be available and is waiting just offstage along with the Musicians of the Spokane Symphony.

Fred and Friends will just have to wait like corks bobbing on the ocean (maybe corks sobbing on the ocean) waiting for someone to generate more events.

I don´t believe that task is Fred and Friends job. They perform. The organization and the people in the rooms nearby generate and service the leads and create the events.

Are those who are in the positions that generate events being replaced? THEIR "salaries" cut? Apparently not at this point.

I´m sure that everyone is trying their best. However going after the "low hanging fruit" is just plain lazy. It breaks a promise to the best performers and to the audience and community that is thrilled every time they have the good fortune to see and hear them.

Let the music play!
Oct 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

Brenda Nienhouse´s salary for the year 2010 was $114,536 according to the IRS 990 filing on Guidestar. That is about 7 times the musician´s salary or roughly the "value" of the entire viola section. Oct 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

On Guidestar, also take a look at the Martin Woldson Theater at the Fox. It had separate 990 filings, and her additional salary is listed there. Oct 19, 2012

 

I believe if you take $100,000 off her salary and give it to the musicians she and the artists would make similar yearly salaries. Make it so. Oct 21, 2012

 

A few points:
Several orchestras across the country are proposing deep pay cuts to their musicians, but the major difference here is that these orchestras are running HUGE deficits. The Spokane Symphony finished last season with a budget SURPLUS.

Also, this article neglects to mention another important point: the management is proposing a very strict leave policy that makes it even more difficult for musicians to find work elsewhere to help supplement their income. This is UNPAID leave.

Additionally, the proposed budget actually INCREASES wages for Symphony administration and staff, while it cuts pay for musicians. Oct 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

Two things:

(1) the proposed contract that is the subject of this article is a two-year contract. The 13% cut is for the first year. The second year offers no minimum guarantees of any kind, either in terms of number of services or number of dollars. The "no strike/no lockout" clause that is standard in all labor agreements would, however, remain in effect; so should they decide to pay the musicians $500 next season, the musicians could not protest without violating the terms of this contract.

(2) The musicians held a vote last weekend and rejected this proposal, but the management has this evening (10-19-12) decided to implement it anyway, in effect declaring that the negotiations are over. Oct 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

I am saddened by the lack of faith the board has placed in the musicians´ contribution to the current state and popularity of the orchestra. These musicians have dedicated their careers to serving our community through their art form and are extremely passionate about what they do. This isn´t about the lack of work dedicated by the musicians, it´s about the board´s reluctance to pay them what they are worth.

While some might think the drop of 2.5k is an absorbable loss. At an income level below 20,000, it may make a significant change in lifestyle. It may mean they can no longer afford their mortgage or make rent. And that is a quick recipe for sending our most accomplished artists out the door to another community that values them more.

Oct 19, 2012 | Reply to this comment

 

If the board was playing what the players were worth, they'd all have comfortably livable incomes, not below-poverty incomes. These dedicated individuals have education levels equivalent to doctors and lawyers, and yet make less than burger flippers. Oct 20, 2012

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close