Deadly Serious

The effort to repeal capital punishment in Washington continues to face an ideological divide

Rep. Timm Ormsby, D-Spokane: "I have not found any causal link between the death penalty and recidivism."
Rep. Timm Ormsby, D-Spokane: "I have not found any causal link between the death penalty and recidivism."

It's an issue of life and death, but you wouldn't have known it by listening to the assembled legislators and citizens talk.

The March hearing in front of the Washington state House Judiciary Committee was all official-sounding sentences and professional courtesies. The formality glossed over the raw emotion of this discussion of death and justice and capital punishment. More than 21 representatives — including one Republican — sponsored House Bill 1504 to repeal Washington's death penalty. Former GOP Gov. Dan Evans prepared a written statement in support of repeal and about 20 citizens attended, giving their testimony in support of repeal. No one testified against.

Although pro-repeal activists paint the issue as clear-cut — a practical economic decision — the issue remains in many ways an ideological one. As last year's hearing highlighted, plenty of vocal and organized support exists for repealing the death penalty. By contrast, there's little or no organized pro-death penalty support. But that isn't to say there is no resistance.

"You get passive dismissal from the pro folks," says Dick Morgan, retired director of Washington's Division of Prisons and a board member of the Washington Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. "A lot of times you will get, 'Oh that's what the people want,' but we don't really know, because the majority of the people haven't voted on it."

That is the crux, and hope, of the repeal argument. Washingtonians voted to reinstate the death penalty in 1981, and since then there have been no other votes. The same bill from last year is back on the agenda for the coming legislative session and has backers in all four caucuses.

Rep. Timm Ormsby, D-Spokane, one of the sponsors of HR 1504, says his support is primarily based on the greater cost of death-penalty cases and that the threat of execution doesn't clearly deter crime.

"I have not found any causal link between the death penalty and recidivism," Ormsby says. "I've not seen anything. In fact, I think that the reverse could be said, that we create a culture of violence."

Many activists steer clear of painting the issue in moral tones, instead preferring to frame it as a rational decision focusing on the "facts."

"I would just urge people to just look at the facts, regardless of what your morals are on this issue," says Holly Ballard, outreach coordinator for the Washington Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. "The policy, as it exists, is not working, and we believe it's not fixable."

That's why the Washington Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty is fighting for repeal, partnering with the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington under the umbrella of the Safe and Just Alternatives Campaign. Despite growing national momentum, the bill is unlikely to go anywhere this year, says Shankar Narayan, ACLU of Washington's legislative director. This is due in large part to Senate gridlock. At the earliest, he says, the bill has a chance of passing in 2015. Until then, he says, it's important to simply raise public awareness.

According to a 2006 survey conducted by the Washington State Bar Association, a death penalty trial costs, on average, about $800,000 more than a non-death penalty trial for aggravated murder. The report concludes that the high cost of capital punishment could "cause a prosecutor in a county with financial constraints to elect not to pursue the death penalty. Such financial pressures could result in the uneven application of the death penalty across the state."

These sorts of financial considerations motivate Morgan. In 2010, he retired after nearly 35 years working in Washington state prisons — 26 spent at the penitentiary in Walla Walla, where all executions are carried out in Washington. Although he won't discuss specifics (per prison regulations), he says that during his career he was present for three executions.

In testimony given in March, he relates how, as director of the penitentiary during the 2008 recession, he was asked to close prisons and lay off employees — a move that, he says, showed him the needless expense of death row. It was the waste of state funds, more than any moral argument, that truly convinced him.

"I can understand why these people would want these folks killed," Morgan says. "And I didn't lose any sleep over the executions that I participated in. ... But I do lose sleep over the fact that my government [carried out the executions]."

Repeal groups share many of the concerns voiced by pro-death-penalty lawmakers. However, for them the key issue is justice. Rep. Brad Klippert, R-Kennewick, says the process takes too long and puts victims' families through too much emotional trauma. Instead of abolishing the death penalty, Klippert believes the whole process should be streamlined. Although he hasn't done this, he suggests reaching out to the courts and the judicial system to see how the process could be expedited.

"The No. 1 thing that I think we need to pursue with the criminal justice system is just that, justice," Klippert says. "And the death penalty is one of the tools that we have ... in our criminal justice system to do just that, pursue justice."

Part of the problem, Klippert says, is that pro-repeal activists don't truly understand the horrendous nature of these crimes.

"I worked as a police officer full time, and I've seen the horrible, heinous things that people do to other innocent people," he says. "For them to say that this would be cruel or unusual ... well, they need to understand the absolute horrible, heinous crimes that [death row inmates] committed."

Klippert says there is little organized pro-death-penalty support because the push to repeal is not a true threat. When and if more momentum builds for the bill, he says, pro supporters will emerge.

Although public opinion is shifting, a majority of Americans still favor capital punishment. In October, Gallup released a poll showing that 60 percent of Americans support the death penalty, the lowest level of support in more than 40 years. Nationwide, 18 states have abolished the death penalty, most recently Maryland in May. Worldwide, 140 countries have abolished the death penalty.

Rep. Reuven Carlyle, D-Seattle, has introduced legislation to repeal the death penalty for the five years he's been in office. Although he believes the capital punishment is ineffective and costly, his primary objection is that it's wrong.

"I think the death penalty is below us as a civilized society," he says. "More than anything, we've reached a tipping point, where the data is overwhelming that this is not achieving a meaningful public policy objective. It's a vestige of an old era."♦

Witness to Wartime: The Painted Diary of Takuichi Fujii @ Northwest Museum of Arts & Culture

Tuesdays-Sundays. Continues through May 16
  • or