Tags: Film , For Fun! , Music , Weezer , Field Report , tuesday taste , Image , Video
Tags: morning briefing , News , Image
Tags: national geographic live , less than jake , spokane chiefs , For Fun! , Image , Video
Tags: caption contest , For Fun! , Image
1. The uncanny ability of the Washington State University football to team to, despite all odds, lose football games at the last possible moment in a spectacular display of giving the football to the other team.
Couging it - the 2013 New Mexico Bowl
2. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Blowing a lead. Losing a game when you have already defined the win.The Cougs really, really Coug-ed it on Saturday night, though. They're going to have to update that definition.
The Washington State Cougars were kicking ass until the fourth quarter when they fumbled three times instead of running out the clock. They sucked so bad they were Couging it.
Tags: WSU , Cougars , EWU , Monday Morning Placekicker , Sports , Image , Video
Tags: morning briefing , News , Image
In a letter dated a few days before the liberal city council got its unofficial "supermajority," Mayor David Condon asked the council to form a joint task force to talk about money. He wanted to analyze how much any future policy change (including any council-proposed ordinance) would cost the city.
The council's response: No thanks.
"We're the legislature. We're a separate branch of government. We have our own process and procedure," Council President Ben Stuckart tells the Inlander. "If the administration wants to run the legislature, they should run for the legislature."
While the mayor and council agree on some things — Condon and most on the council are working to convince citizens to pass this fall's street levy and park bond, for example — their divisions have become increasingly clear as the council has become more liberal this year. One of those pressure points is around the council's push to make the city greener. Administration spokesman Brian Coddington says part of the mayor's desire for a joint group is the result of questions about the cost of a recent Stuckart-sponsored ordinance requiring the city to use recycled paper.
When Stuckart presented the ordinance at a council meeting in July, he cited figures he'd received from the environmental programs section of the city utilities department. The switch would cost the city about $8,900, he estimated. And if they switched to buying all paper products through one contract, they could save $3,000, bringing the total impact down to $5,900.
But now the administration is presenting a very different estimate of what the paper switch will cost: $25,000. That's according to the city's in-house print shop, which oversees the city's paper purchasing, Coddington says.
So how did two city departments come to such vastly different estimates?
Lloyd Brewer, who oversees the city's environmental programs, says it's about details. The estimate he sent the council was just for the basic copy paper the city uses the most: 8 1/2 by 11 inches, legal and tabloid size.
"It didn't include envelopes or other kinds of paper," he says. "I thought the direction they were heading was to write the ordinance just for that. They ended up writing the ordinance to cover just about any type of paper product we buy."
It turns out covering every type of paper in City Hall is not cheap. And that other piece — the one about saving money by consolidating how the city orders paper — may be a ways off. That's because different departments are at different points in ongoing paper supply contracts and because the city isn't sure where it could store all that paper.
"It's not something ... that's going to be able to be done in the shorter term," Brewer says. "It will likely be a year or a couple years."
(The law does include a caveat that recycled paper should only be purchased if it "performs adequately for its intended use and is available at a fair and reasonable price." So, how much leeway do departments really have in choosing the more expensive recycled option? Brewer says he expects clarification on that from the council or city legal soon.)
Councilman Mike Fagan, the group's outspoken fiscal conservative, says he's not sure the council should jump into a joint relationship with the administration to analyze every ordinance, but he's concerned about potential costs of the new council majority's priorities.
"I think these things are happening because of the direction of the council. The left has got the majority at this point and the Sustainability Action Plan was created by those that lean to the left," Fagan says. "I don’t really care about the Sustainability Action Plan and I don’t know what’s in it, but I have heard conversations that we’re just taking these planks one at a time. ... The taxpayer needs to know what’s going on. It's those guys we work for that are paying the bill."
For Stuckart, even $25,000, in the scope of the city's total $600 million budget, is worth the environmental value of switching to recycled paper. But to the administration, it's a warning sign.
"This is an example of why it's important to have a good discussion about the fiscal impact before you move ahead with an ordinance," Coddington says. "It makes sure everybody is on the same page and understands all of the ramifications."
Tags: city hall , ben stuckart , david condon , mike fagan , News , Image
The U.S. Supreme Court decided this morning that it will not hear appeals to rulings allowing same-sex marriage in five states: Indiana, Wisconsin, Utah, Oklahoma and Virginia, effectively allowing marriage in those states. In the cases in question, lower courts had struck down bans on same-sex marriage and those decisions had been appealed. With the Supreme Court refusing to hear the appeals, the earlier decisions will stand and same-sex weddings could begin immediately. And with those decisions no longer in question, they'll also now apply in other states covered by the same appeals courts, bringing the total number of states where gay marriage is legal to 30.
“I’m blown away by this. It is a watershed moment for the entire country," an ACLU lawyer told the Washington Post.
You'll remember that Idaho has spent the year undergoing its own battle over marriage equality. For now, the state remains a "Meanwhile..." footnote in talk about today's SCOTUS decision. Because Idaho was not one of these five cases, the decision won't immediately clear the way for marriages there. The Supreme Court seems to be indicating that it will defer to the lower courts on this issue (at least while they're rejecting same-sex marriage bans), and that's likely to have some effect on future rulings — it's just unclear exactly what. In early September, the 9th Circuit heard Idaho's case, in which the state is defending its voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage. That court could rule at any time.
Tags: marriage equality , gay marriage , idaho , News , Image
Tags: photo , culture , music , terrain , art , Arts & Culture , Image
Tags: Concert review , Pixies , Black Francis , INB Performing Arts Center , Music , Image